Skinny Legs at the MOCA Gala
November 15, 2009 in Take a Guess!, Who Is Hotter? by Versus
A gala doesn’t obligatorily require long dresses these days – so here are 2 examples of short dresses + skinny legs at The Museum of Contemporary Art.
Can you guess their owners? And which pair is your favorite?
Turn the page to see these girls!
Chloe Sevigny & Kate Bosworth!
i’ve spent several months in recovery, but really you just try to do a...
chloes legs are to die for…theyre skinny but still have some muscle definition.
and im glad to see kates legs are no longer skeletal looking. lately shes been looking excellent
They’re both probably going to get “chicken leg” comments but I think both of their legs look nice! Thin and shapely, especially Kate Bosworth’s.
Legs look really nice; turning the page was not the best idea for me, however.
LOL…you are so right !
Chloe’s legs are awesome. I love Kate’s face but when i look at her hair i can only picture her singing “ana & mia are my best friends”… BUT maybe she was overweight in Blue Crush, idk……………lol
and by overweight i meant over her natural weight, of course
Haha, nice save 8D
And now I’ll break the praise-chain, and say that skinny legs are definitely not something I find attractive. Well, actually I think *all* legs are ugly, I really think legs look ridiculous – they’re quite handy when walking, though. But, if I were to choose, chunky and/or athletic legs are more attractive to me
Ellie you are effing hyterical. Legs – such silly, offensive (yet functional) things
I like their legs equally, but Kate is prettier and I hate Chloe’s dress.
i love chloe’s legs! i never was a big fan of her looks wise, but after becoming addicted to the show big love, i got used to her and don’t mind her looks anymore. hate her dress though. kate’s got some major trout pout.
Kate, no contest!
Neither…
I prefer a little more meat on my legs.
@ Ellie : LMFAO. nice comment
Their legs are ok. I like more meat on the legs, but personal opinion.
I, like someone mentioned, was not a fan when I turned the page. Neither look appealing here, especially with their dress choices.
They’re both incredibly unattractive, but decent legs.
i’d kiiiill for those legs.
not a huge fun of either of those women in general, though.
They both have killer legs. Very shapely in a nice way..
I don’t understand people who say they preffer one over the other.
Baring spray tan, they’re identical.
Heck, they look like a before and after for tanning HAHA.
I was thinking exactly that when I saw the pictures!
I thought it would be like a tan-on, tan-off thing.
I think this is how cookie-cutter Hollywood has gotten at times when it comes to female bodies.
Hm, I don’t know. To me the first set of legs looked more toned but now that you mention it they do look more alike than I first thought.
Maybe it’s the tan that was giving the illusion of tone.
Yup. Tanned skin looks more sculpted on average because shadows are more obvious (it can make your legs look skinnier too).
Both look great. Unfortunately only legs look great on these girls here.
yup. when I turned the page I thought kate was nicole kidman at first!! (pretty sure that’s a 15? yr or so age difference?) Anyway, their legs look good for skinny legs.
i like legs that are alittle bigger i dont like skinny legs i dont like skinny bodies either
I’m all for skinny legs, I think Nadine coyle has great legs. Maybe to small for some I know.
Why someone would want meat on their legs?
walking, hiking…more space for tattoos?who knows?