These Legs Belong to…
September 5, 2010 in Take a Guess! by Versus
Who’s looking slim, pretty and leggy?
These Legs Belong to…
Turn the page!
Natalie Portman!
If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed! Thousands of people already did!
These Legs Belong to…
72 Comments
Leave a Reply
She’s so gorgeous and talented.
love her
Eh, overrated in all respects.
OMG, so agree with you! I think the only reason people fawn over her the way they do is because she isn’t in the tabloids. I think she is very pretty, but she is also kind of “average” looking without makeup on.
basically everyone looks average without makeup on
Gorgeous!! She is the definition of class!
I want to agree but having an affair with Sean Penn the bigot was NOT classy, at all.
rlly? omg lol
Oh Miss Portman, you are so lovely.
she looks cute but that dress doesnt suit her petite frame
exactly
of course she’s fit. she did 5 hours of ballet every day for months (for a role) and got paid for it too (well for the results and skills).
jealous? yeh. but i like my life.
she’s always been skinny and if she has been doing all this dancing she certainly hasn’t developed dancers legs.
lol. what do you mean by, “u like ur life”? lol
shes so cute
She’s ridiculously beautiful.
cute, too skinny
oh VINCENT CASSEL is behind her !!!
emmm… Yes, she is gorgeous !!!
u got a crush on him, dont u? hehe
her smile is so pretty!!
i thought it was someone taller
would never guess it it’s Natalie… she looks nice…
Me, too!!! I never guessed her legs to be THAT long. She’s soo gorgeous!
No kidding. I did not know she had awesome legs. Now I’m really starting to get jealous of the girl
Just goes to show that petite (short) women can have long legs in proportion to their bodies too.
her shoes are so nice
i rarely pay attention to them but yeaaaa i would love to have em
her face is sublime. she always makes me feel good about being petite
Very classicly pretty girl but this hair colour does nothing for her! She looks so much better with darker hair. Why does everyone in hollywood have to get highlights, its boring.
Thank you!!! I have always wondered why everyone needs highlights. I get my natural red highlights lifted from my hair for an ash brown color and I love it.
And I agree, Natalie’s natural hair color is gorgeous. She doesn’t need highlights.
Agree! This hair colour looks icky on her!
I broke my leg this summer and couldn’t bear weight on it for six weeks. During that time, I lost eight pounds of muscle from my leg; it just melted off due to atrophy. My broken leg at its skinniest and most frail looked a lot like Natalie Portman’s legs here (except for the surgery scars of course). I think there’s something very, very wrong with that.
Everybody is built differently. I could never have muscular, bulky legs if I worked out everyday of my life. It’s called genetics, hun, and there’s nothing wrong with slim legs.
I agree. I’m a runner and I have crazy defined leg muscles, like annalynne mccord bulky muscles. My friend, who’s at least as fast as me, has legs like Whitney Port. I don’t know where she hides the leg muscles. Some people are just lucky like that.
i have similar legs but i wouldnt call it lucky. i think someone like vanessa hudgens has perfect legs. grass is always greener, i suppose.
Thanks for declaring my legs “bulky”! It really helps to prove your point that your legs are sooooo much prettier than mine because you have the superior genetics.
You can keep your chicken legs; let’s see how far they’ll take you compared to a set of real legs.
looks like you let your subconcious do the talking there, cus no one is saying that skinny legs are prettier over muscular legs.
and what is that last sentence supposed to even MEAN? lol. is there some national leg competition im not aware of? by the way last time i checked, my legs aren’t imaginary. hate to break it to you but your legs are no more “real” than a pair of thin legs.
woah… i love my chicken legs, i never though they were imaginary..thanks dear!
First of all, she’s always been slim. This is her natural frame (she may naturally weight 5 pounds more or so, since she just got done shooting the physically demanding movie, “Black Swan”). Second of all, she’s like 5’1″-5’2″. To my eyes she looks at a perfectly fine weight for her height.
Third of all, if I may inject some personal information, I’m that short and my legs look even thinner than hers. Not really anything I can do about it since every woman in my family has chiken legs.
Dont go around making assumptions just because she’s not built like you.
My legs look pretty much exactly like hers, and I’m on a (quite healthy, lots of protein) diet of 2500 calories a day. I work out 3-4 days a week for about 45 minutes.
Although it may be scary for you to have legs that size, because of your particular body shape and type, for others, it isn’t. I have what I guess is a naturally thin, petite frames. Bulky leg muscles will never be something I can achieve, and certainly not “healthy” for me to try to.
Perhaps Natalie Portman is the same way? She’s always been slim and didn’t suddenly drop a large amount of muscle mass to indicate that she should have larger legs.
I don’t think you girls realize quite how wrong you are. I’m not 5’10″ and built like a Williams sister. I’m 5’2″ and considered “petite.” Save me the “oh, everyone is built differently” silliness; legs this small are indicative of atrophied, weak leg muscles, and that’s not attractive or healthy at all.
Rabble rabble!
You have no idea what you’re talking about. There is nothing wrong with her legs and they have always been shaped like this. Lots of people have legs shaped like this and it has nothing to do with atrophy. Why can’t you accept this?
Lol. Ok then. I’ll just go eat 30 pounds of red meat and go bulk up in the gym for 5 hours a day. Just to satisfy your standards of beauty.
I think the only one who doesn’t realize they’re wrong is you.
I bet those with “chicken legs” could do everything you can, and perhaps more.
And everyone IS built differently. It’s hard to always understand that someone else doesn’t have the same experiences with their body as you, but at least try. Because by your logic, if I generalized my body experienes the way you are doing, anybody with legs thicker than Natalie’s must be eating over 3000 calories a day. See how that’s a stupid assumption?
I used to go to the gym with one ogmy friends. She is onlyone inch taller than I am and weighted a little more. We did the same weight training and cardiovascular programm. While she had trouble building muscle mass in her legs and belly she had some awesome toned arms after a few months,
I on the other hand build muscle pretty fast everywhere , meaning toned to muscly legs , therefore I stopped working them. Still mine where much more toned than the so called “chicken legs” of my friend even though she lifted heavy weights.
Gos to show, that photos tell you nothing about a person. Not how much they weight or how healthy they are or how much they work out . Natalie always was tiny little thing , to me she looks great the way she is.
Haha, I just read your blog, where you say you’re 124 lbs. And you’re 5’2″ and you consider yourself petite.
Dude, that is not petite. That is average at best.
At least weight wise.
geez, that was mean. I would consider someone who is 5’2 124 petite. I know people that size who are positively TINY. You don’t know what her body fat percentage is or how she carries her weight.
I don’t think there is any reason to put other posters’ body down like that, especially when some people are clearly very sensitie about their bodies
How is saying that someone’s weight is average, not petite, mean? especially when that person is calling women with thin legs unhealthy and weak when that is far from the truth. Plus, I feel that she’s saying that women who don’t agree with that perspective are dumb and don’t know what they’re talking about.
Plus, I’m pretty sure if you put that weight and height into a BMI calculator, it would say the exact same thing as I said. That weight is a standard weight for that height, not a petite weight. Petite by definition is small, thin, delicate, etc. If I said that Beth Ditto isn’t petite, would that be mean too?
I LOVE HER! Ever since Queen Amidala, I’ve been a fan and I can’t wait to see the Black Swan – I saw the trailer and it looks like an Oscar-winning movie.
And she definitely looks much better than Angelina Jolie, hmm, seems like her vegan diet didn’t kill her (had to bring it up
)
VEGAN FOR THE WIN!!!
Ha, good point
She’s not a vegan. Her favorite drink is milk.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/natalie-portman/jonathan-safran-foers-iea_b_334407.html
And check wikipedia. You can also just google Natalie Portman vegan…. She’s vegan, I assure you.
She said so herself in an article for Glamour that she drinks one glass of milk a day and eats eggs. That does not qualify as vegan. Also, wikipedia is not a reliable source for everything. She is certainly a vegetarian, but not vegan.
My information was from her quotes but apparently, she has become a vegan recently. It will be interesting to see if she keeps up with it, considering she’s stated that milk is her favorite thing to drink.
verus, if you can, do you think you could post pictures of sofia coppola and elle fanning at the venice film festival premiere of “somewhere”? they’re so gorgeous, they deserve a post
Pretty, but at least half my friends at high school were more beautiful, even without all the special makeup and dresses and things she gets. Overrated I reckon
lemme see pics. i dont believe u.
Very cute face. Don’t like her legs though. And….. Don’t like her anyway !
She’s so pretty, naturally too! Nice fit body, and just radient. Although I don’t consider her to be the best actress, she’s certainly better than her other equally attractive colleagues like Jessica Alba or Megan Fox.
I don´t think she´s skinny at all. Look at her arms! Stunning face and nice eyebrows (mine are the same shape, kind of horizontal)
Wow! It’s crazy how different bodys have such different fat distribution. When I first saw just the legs I thought “omg those legs must belong to some seriouslly skinny kind of sick chick” until I saw the complete picture and it was a totally different story, she actually looks pretty healthy from the torso up
I don’t know about you girls, but I have really muscular legs, and I’d DIE for skinny little ‘chicken legs.’ No lie.
Same here, just as someone said above … the grass is always greener on the other side ^^.
Same here!! My legs bulk up really easily and I hate it.. :/
Same! And I’m short too (5’2”). Sigh.
But Natalie is geeooorrgeous! Very beautiful and fresh.
I totally thought it was Zoe Saldana.
Her and Keira Knightley used to look so much alike.
They’re finally looking like different people.
Natalie no longer is her mini me.
I think she’s very pretty. She’s slim, but she’s not unhealthy looking.
She`s a natural beauty and very talented.THe dress is nice but it`s like it`s gonna slide down from her small boobs
She’s always stunning.
Gorgeous the new Winona Ryder of our generation!
Shes 5 “3″ and i’d say a 100lbs-105 at the most
When I lose weight it comes of my face and legs giving me that gaunt look even though i’m not!
I think she is absolutely gorgeous.
For those of you that think she’s “overrated” or “average”, I think it’s important to remember that she’s not famous for just being beautiful like say megan fox, she’s famous for actually being a good actress, that just happens to good looking. Although, in my opinion she’s a lot better looking than megan fox.
Her legs look amazing and insanely long for her height.
She is very gorgeous. She is a very pretty girl with a great body.
She looks so pretty! I love her body and her dress, but i think she would look a tiny bit better is she gained like 5 pounds