Guess Tor Spelling’s Weight!
October 9, 2009 in Celebrity Weight & Measurements, Take a Guess!, Tori Spelling by Versus

Can you guess Tor Spelling’s weight?
The number comes directly from Teri!
Tori’s height: 5’6” (168 cm)
Check out the number plus a weight related paragraph from Us Weekly after the jump!
She says she’s 107 pounds (49 kg)!
Us Weekly reports:
Here’s the skinny. Tori Spelling is slamming a Star cover story that alleges she collapsed and had to be rushed to the ER for being drastically underweight at 95 pounds.
The Tori and Dean: Home Sweet Hollywood star, 36, took to her Twitter account to set the record straight.
“Star Mag…LIES!” she posted Thursday. “Literally not 1 factual thing in entire article. And, come 2 my house & weigh me Star! I’m 107lbs. if you care about FACTS?!?”
The tabloid alleges that a painfully thin Spelling collapsed after an “angry showdown” with husband Dean McDermott, whose ex-wife has written an incriminating tell-all.
The 90210 alum was indeed admitted to the hospital twice within 24 hours on Sept. 29 — but for an undisclosed stomach ailment, her rep confirmed to Usmagazine.com.
Spelling has come under fire in the past for her thin frame, but told Us Weekly in June: “I am healthy…I am a busy working mom!” The actress went on, adding that she’s “always gotten” picked on for her slim body size.
“This is my weight, and I’m not unhealthy,” Spelling insisted. “I’m very healthy. It is hard to be criticized in public, and it’s harder for your family to deal with it than you. You kind of get a thick skin. When you have kids and when you have a husband, it’s upsetting.”










Holy BOBBLE HEAD!
If Tori is 107, it’s still way too low of a weight. She would look better if she added at least 10 more pounds to her frame.
I believe the 107 pounds, but at her age she should weigh a bit more. It would soften her a little.
I agree. At her age, she should not try to weigh as little as she did during the ’90s, that’s just not realistic. Also, she should quit augmenting her lips (and boobs) if she wants to be so skinny because they are just too disproportionate with her tiny frame.
Also how much would her breast implants weigh? because if they are heavy then that will be adding to the weight she is at.
I thought she looked 120
That’s interesting. I guessed 98 because I’m the same height and I was nowhere near that thin at 107. I guess it goes to show that weight on the scale doesn’t mean all that much!
Or maybe your body perception is skewed.
I was technically underweight, but I didn’t look it. When I asked friends and family to guess how much I weighed they would all say “about 120.” No one thought I looked unhealthy. In fact, I got nothing but compliments at that weight.
Now I actually am 120 and I’m looking a little fleshy. I guess I must look about 133 then. I’m too afraid to ask!
The point is that different people look skinnier/fatter at the same weight and Tori is looking pretty sickly like that, especially in the arms. Unfortunately, I don’t think she can do much about that mug!
Yeah, sometimes what you see in the mirror is bigger than reality. At least that is how it is for me sometimes.
107 at 5′6” means a BMI of ~17,5. That’s already underweight so it’s surprising anyone would look other than skinny-thin with those stats, but i guess body types count. I think it’s very possible she weighs 107. Which is not healthy, as she claims to be. Eating healthy food and exercising doesn’t quite do it if ur body isn’t getting enough vitamins and minerals and all that.
Well, it also depends on how much muscle you have. 107pds with muscle looks a lot thinner than 107pds of mostly fat.
body frame/size makes a HUGE difference as well. . .
But how do you know it’s not healthy? Because it wouldn’t be healthy for you?
I have an underweight BMI close to hers. I have never dieted and I don’t exercise aside from walking (which I choose to do to keep my heart/lungs strong that way I don’t get out of breath walking up a flight of stairs). I eat a high fat/high protein diet, but balance it with fruits and veggies to have vitamins and fiber. And I’m still that thin.
For me to be “normal BMI” I would have to be unhealthy (no more exercise at all, no more veggies, only junk food…etc). Could it not be the same for Tori, who has always been thin? Isn’t it possible that she’s healthy now, and would be unhealthy at 20 pounds more.
She must be getting sick of these anorexia accusations. I know I was, but then I stopped caring because health > appearance.
I was last year at 100 and have the same height but I was soft…meaning I had no muscles at all…she does, which decreases her body fat % even more….that’s why she also looks 98 and not 107…its the muscles.
too thin, and very bad boob job. it looks like she has lip injections too.
btw her face is just unattractive, especially in this picture. ask any guy and he will tell u what he thinks. she can have any body shape but it will not help with that face.
omg im not even joking I GUESSED 107 lbs!! i dont know why but that number popped in my head and i went with it. i cant believe i was dead on! holy shit im psychic people lol… lucky guesses…
Take it easy KaT…… you are going to need some psychic zanax,,,,,
Haha!
If she gained another 10 pounds, she would look great imo. Right now she looks too thin and bobble-headed.
I think she looks good, I don’t really care what her scale weight number is. In my opinion she doesn’t look scary skinny or about to collapse, she looks like a woman who is solid and steadfast with what she puts in her mouth. She looks about the same or slightly heavier than a Victoria’s Secret model.
I believe that she weighs 107 lbs. But you have to account for her fake boobs. They have to weigh at least 6 lbs. So she really weighs 101.
Also, I just realized…107 lbs at 5’6″ is a BMI of 17.3. Fits the weight criteria for anorexia nervosa.
And I wonder if she is weighing herself with clothes on? If so, you have to subtract another 3 lbs. And if she is weighing herself at night…another 2. So she could easily weigh 96 lbs. (107 minus 3 for clothes, 2 for weighing at night, & 6 for breast implants).
There must be something positive to which you can put your incredibly “whatever” mathematical skills ………
I’ll second that DT.
Oh, really? Any suggestions?
how about counting sheep…..
PS.. thanks E.M …
So many accredited psychologists on this site. Whodathunk.
hey now, even us psychologists use the internet sometimes
yeah it’s still underweight but I’m kind of excited that we actually know a celeb’s real weight — it’s gotta be a first!
Her head looks really big. She’s too thin for her head :\\
Pretty dress, though.
I believe it.. I love her dress and necklace.. and thing is.. shes always been sooo skinny.. remember back in the 90210 days? as small as a woman can get.
well i do think her face look awful so bubble head she is not a toy she is human and faces should not look like that
If I were her publicist, I would have her photoshopped to look fatter
Wow, funny, that. People around me have about the same height-weight comparison as Tori. That is, 20-25 points lower in kilos than their height in cm. But they don’t look as weird because our bones and frame are naturally small. In my country, what count as anorexic and needs health treatment is BMI lower than 15. 16, you look as disproportionate as Tori but your teacher won’t say anything much (we have annual health check even in University).
I agree Tori doesn’t look sickly, but jeez, does she seriously think that people would look down at her if she relax a little, doesn’t diet and train as hard which she must be doing to maintain that figure?
aw my guess was 105
haha with ohwowlovely’s math i can totally see her being 96 lbs
She says 107 like it’s so far from 95, which I find funny…
I just went and looked through some of her pictures on her IMDb profile, and I just have to say that she looked her best right after giving birth, why did she make herself get so thin again after her babies?
And if she didn’t do it on purpose, wow.
Tori wake up, you are wasting away! For a small frame you should be at:
120-133lbs.
People in general concentrate too much on weight, BMI and so on. Being 168 cm and weighting 49 is not wrong or anorexic, but on her…it looks wrong. I don’t think that weight is meant for her, she would look better with a few extra kilos, it would fit her so much better
And, she would look softer, and perhaps younger.
uh actually, 168 cm & 49 kg is a BMI of 17.4.
The weight requirement to be diagnosed with AN is a BMI of <17.5.
Nope, that’s a small component of diagnosis. To be diagnosed with anorexia according to DSM which is what doctors and psychiatrists use. you have to have:
•Intense fear of gaining weight or becoming fat
•Disturbance in the way one’s body weight or shape are experienced,
•Amenorrhea (at least three consecutive cycles) in postmenarchal girls and women
You can be normal BMI and have anorexia, and abnormal BMI and not be anorexic. Anorexia isn’t diagnosed by weight, it’s a mental disorder and it’s diagnosed mainly by mental symptoms. Weight just indicates that there MIGHT be a mental disorder.
I am aware that is a small part of the diagnosis, which is why I only said it fits the weight requirement. I didn’t say it fits the entire criteria.
Ok. It just sounded like you were saying that weight is one of the biggest criterion for diagnosing anorexia, which is a common misconception but not the truth. A doctor who sees a normal sized girl, or even a chubby girl, calling herself fat and refusing to eat to the point of vitamin deficiencies is still diagnosed with anorexia, even though they do not meet the weight requirement. And someone with a BMI of 16 would not get diagnosed with anorexia unless they showed a fear of gaining weight. I’m just trying to familiarize other people with the illness before they talk about it absentmindedly.
Someone who is normal or overweight, despite their eating habits, restricting, purging, or mental associations with an eating disorder would NOT to be classified as anorexic. The definition of anorexia and bulimia are very strict and have been the subject of heavy criticism because of this.
Someone who meets all of the qualifications for anorexia EXCEPT being underweight would be considered EDNOS. As I have been diagnosed EDNOS, and have been for ten years, and in this exact situation…I’m fairly certain.
Please do not familiarize other people with the illness while your own familiarities are incorrect.
Just to add:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eating_disorder_not_otherwise_specified
“This category is frequently used for people who meet some, but not all, of the diagnostic criteria for anorexia nervosa or bulimia nervosa. For example, a person who shows almost all of the symptoms of anorexia nervosa, but who still has a normal menstrual cycle and/or body mass index, can be diagnosed with EDNOS.”
Juliette, I worked for over a year as an intern at a VA hospital where anorexia nervosa was diagnosed in individuals who failed to meet the BMI requirement, as long as they showed vitamin deficiencies or ammenorhea. We reserved the diagnosis of ednos for people we weren’t sure were extreme dieting or were suffering from an eating disorder. I looked up ednos in the DSM and you are right.
But the DSM is very flexible, and you could still be diagnosed with anorexia even if you fail to meet one of the symptoms, but meet all of the others. That’s because the DSM is a guideline, not a rule, and if a psychologist thinks you have anorexia nervosa, they can diagnose you for it despite the fact that you may be normal weight. Most psychologists do because it’s hard to get health benefits on a diagnosis of ednos and they would like to be able to treat the patient, so they will use the diagnosis of anorexia nervosa. Careful psychologists will wait and see, and change the diagnosis from ednos to anorexia if necessary. The weight criterion is the least important when diagnosing anorexia nervosa. I would say ammenorhea and vitamin deficiencies are even more telling than weight.
But nevertheless, you made me curious about where the line is drawn between ednos and anorexia nervosa, so I’m going to send a few emails to my professors/supervisors and see.
Casey, if somebody is 300lbs and still never eats and fears gaining weight no doctor in their right mind would call them anorexic.
Weight, BMI and whether or not the sufferer has missed a menstrual cycle are taken into heavy consideration. Obviously if somebody is 16BMI but they eat a healthy amount and aren’t obsessively preoccupied with their weight, they wouldn’t be diagnosed with anorexia. They may or may not have a different medical illness or may just have a thin bodytype.
As Juliette pointed out E.D.N.O.S. is the category “everybody else” falls into.
As the National Association of Anorexia Nervosa and Associated Eating disorder says a necessary requirement for anorexia “1. Weight
15% below ideal body weight. Refusing to maintain a normal weight or above-normal weight for height and age… ”
and a requirement for Eating Disorders Not Otherwise Specified ”
anorexia nervosa are met except that the individual has regular menses.
All of the criteria for anorexia nervosa are met except that, despite substantial weight loss, the individual’s current weight is in the normal range.”
So your claim that “A doctor who sees a normal sized girl, or even a chubby girl, calling herself fat and refusing to eat to the point of vitamin deficiencies is still diagnosed with anorexia, even though they do not meet the weight requirement.” is incredibly wrong.
You really shouldn’t boast about your knowledge of eating disorders by running around correcting everybody else when it seems like your own knowledge is very off.
Cary-x, most psychologists and creators of the DSM believe that all psychological orders have a biological or neural basis, which we may not have discovered yet, but exist. Therefore, there is a belief that anorexia nervosa is some specific neural or biological abnormality.
Unless you are trying to tell me that a 300 pound person has a different brain or DNA than the average person, they are susceptible to the same abnormalities as an average person. Now, granted, a 300 pound person would be vary rarely diagnosed with anorexia; at that point, an ednos diagnosis would probably be made. But an ednos diagnosis does not signify a biological or neural pathology, just a “we’re not sure if this person has an already-determined abnormality.” A 300 pound person who suffers from the mental symptoms of anorexia nervosa and has vitamin deficiencies or ammenorhea due to starvation does probably have anorexia nervosa and could be diagnosed for it. Doctors are just not sure why the person continues to have a high weight (not sure if the person binges, for example) so they give them the diagnosis of ednos with the intention of changing it to anorexia nervosa later if they don’t find any evidence against the person having anorexia nervosa. They basically need to figure out if the high weight is due to something that makes a diagnosis of anorexia nervosa impossible; there are some things that don’t preclude an anorexia diagnosis but that cause high weight.
For example, if I told you your 300 pound person has a thyroid problem that makes it near impossible for them to lose weight, but they stopped having a period, have vitamin deficiencies, are afraid of gaining weight and are starving themselves, and show the same neural patterns as skinny anorexics, would you not diagnose them with anorexia? Do you see why the weight criteria IS a criteria, but not the main one?
Also, read my reply to Juliette. You may think I’m wrong, that’s fine, but I do have training in this and I am only regurgitating that which several experts in the field have instructed me on. You may disagree with me and that is fine, but I am also not making stuff up and there might be at least something to what I am saying.
I thought by the way you spoke, you had a PhD and were practicing, not an intern…which you seem to think means something. It’s the equivalent of me touting my three year software internship around and pledging that I know more than the founder of Microsoft. The site I cited probably was written by someone who might know more than an intern who regurgitates information told to her.
No offense intended at all, but I’m not sure why you think an internship lends you any credibility or why you think that your belief that every other website cited is incorrect why you, the intern, are correct. You’ve really lost a lot of credibility with me and I can’t help feeling like I’m discussing this with a college student who just got her first internship and is very, very, very, proud of it.
I do want to reiterate that I’m not trying to be offensive or insult you. I realize that I can come off that way when it’s not my intentions.
Cary-x, I have 6 years of schooling in this field, that was my 2nd internship, I have years of research experience, and am on my way to a PsyD. You are right, I am still not there yet. That’s why I can’t go out and practice. But I have been taught by people who have 30+ years of experience dealing with anorexics, not people who write articles. Research psychologists and clinical psychologists are different.
Besides, I am not disagreeing with the DSM or the website, I am saying that one symptom should not hold that much ground. Instead, psychologists should use the DSM as a guide, not a rulebook (and that’s what the DSM itself says to do), and look at overall patient history. You can have all of the PhD’s in the world, but they will be valueless if you treat a patient’s fate in the hands of 5 sentences. Any research psychologist would disagree with me, but every practicing psychologist would agree.
I’m not trying to establish credibility to you, nor am I saying I am at the top of the field, but it’s not like I know nothing either. I wish you would take what I said, exactly how I said it, and take it to a real practicing psychologist and see if they agree with me or not. Or whoever you think has the credibility. That is my intention. Have a good day.
If she says she’s healthy I believe her. She has pectus excavatum (sunken chest). People who have that are generally slim, and appear to be even slimmer. I’m sure she would love to gain 10 pounds as people here are saying and look lovely, but she might not be able to do it in a healthy way. And that’s fine.
No, she definitely weighs less than 107.
she looks unhealty and her head looks like a big baloon floatig upon her neck…horrible
I don’t consider this “scary skinny”… Rachel Zoe is definately too thin, but Tori Spelling’s figure is natural. After all, think back to her old 90210 days- she’s always been that skinny. It must be so hard for her to battle rumors of an eating disorder as a woman in her thirties that is trying to raise children and lead a happy life. Stay Strong Tori… i believe you
No way! I’m an inch taller and 5 lbs lighter but look larger! I’m convinced she’s lying.
Why would she lie? She invited the newspaper to come and weigh her. Star vs. Tori Spelling? Yeah I’mma go with Tori Spelling, she has a better reputation for credibility at least.
I really don’t think she owes anyone an explanation for anything. She has no obligation to reveal her weight to anyone; and these news outlets clearly don’t care about her health, they’re just looking to a sell a story.
What else is new?
is this pic photoshopped? her right elbow looks spongy and weird. if her arms are real, shes definitly too skinny. I don’t like her looks at all but i feel sorry for her too. she’s just deeply disturbed by her creepy hollywood-family.
i guessed 105!so i think she is telling the truth. i think she looks better but could still do with gaining at least 10 more
She looks fine at her weight… Leave the poor girl alone..
I feel like she is shrinking…she would be looking very good if she was a little bit curvy.Her dress makes the hips look bigger but we all know she’s very skinny.If you’re healthy then you dont go to hospital twice because of the stomach.(starvation?)
What? I’m 5’6″ and 107 pounds and I am way more curvy than that (curvy as in curves and not fat). I think she is lying.
don’t forget her well trained body … muscles weight more than fat and make you look skinnier.
i estimated her weight at about 110 lbs. So i was very close.
As a young mum she does a lot of workout which helps you to loose your weight caused by pregnancy.
Her body gave birth to a child, so she was at a healthy weight. Now she is back to her former figure.
I think her weight is just right for her small frame and for beeing always this skinny. Only her had is really big, even if she would way more it would look big.
I’d guess 115