Skinny VS Curvy

Tweet

… Or at least, that’s what the director of the Miss Australia peagant says. Right.

Radar Online Reports:

An Australian Miss Universe finalist, whose rail-thin appearance caused a stir as she pranced down the catwalk in a bikini, tells Good Morning America, she was singled out and victimized for her skinny appearance in the contest.

“I’ve never been anorexic or bulimic, I’ve never been malnourished or underfed,” Stephanie Naumoska said. “I live a healthy, active lifestyle.”

Critics, citing the model’s visible bones and ribcage, said Naumoska’s emaciated look was a danger to herself and those looking to emulate the her. A judge in the competition remarked he would have “wanted to go and feed her straightaway” if he was her daughter.

The 19-year-old brunette is at 5 feet, 10 inches tall and weighs 105 ponds with a body-mass index score, at 15.8, less than the 18 score she would need to be considered malnourished.

Naumoska said she wasn’t malnourished; she said that if she was, her hair and skin wouldn’t look as healthy as it does, and she wouldn’t have the energy to prepare for the grueling contests.

The director of the Miss Australia pageant said Naumoska’s Macedonian heritage was the reason for her appearance.

“The women do have long, lithe bodies and small bones,” Deborah Miller told UK Daily Mail last week. “It’s their body type, just as Asian girls tend to be rather small. She doesn’t have an eating disorder or anything like that. There’s nothing wrong with her.”

Tweet

Tweet

Here’s a beauty queen for you all: Miss Universe Australia Rachael Finch!

Brief description: Her arms look really thin (and really long, her legs are long as well), but she she also appears to be very toned.

How do you find Miss Australia?

And another detail: One of the contestants at Miss Australia was labeled as “malnourished” and “too bony” by specialists – her name is Stephanie Naumoska (19, pictured below), who weighs 108 lbs at 5’11” (49 kg, 1.80 m). The current Miss Australia, Rachael Finch, defended Stephanie, saying that she is “naturally thin”.

Here’s Stephanie (she really is extremely thin):

3 more pics of Miss Universe Australia Rachael Finch after the jump!

Read the rest of this entry →

Tweet

Tweet

… Says Star Magazine:

Tori Spelling’s weight continues to plunge dramatically, yet she’s still not satisfied with her look.

The 90210 icon has shrunk to a skeletal 95 lbs (at 5’6”), say experts — and those close to her are begging her to get help!

Even her estranged mother, Candy Spelling, thinks Tori is anorexic and is desperate to bury the hatchet in order to help. She has made it clear that money is no object, and she’ll pay to send Tori to a top treatment facility, a family source tells Star.

“Candy is a nervous wreck over Tori. She thinks she is really troubled and anorexic. In all the years I’ve known Tori, this is the worst I have ever seen her.”

Tori — whose jean size has shrunk to a shocking 00 — admits that her diet changed drastically after her daughter was born in June 2008. “I just changed the way that I ate after I had Stella,” says Tori, who also has a 2-year-old son, Liam, with husband Dean McDermott.

The busy mom and author of Mommywood denies she has an eating disorder, but still admits that her meals often consist of scraps from her children’s leftovers. In one interview she said that could mean eating as little as a piece of hot dog, a broccoli floret and a single french fry — a scant 130 calories!

“Everybody is trying to figure out how to convince Tori she needs help,” another insider tells Star.

Tweet

Tweet

OK, definitely scary skinny territory, definitely extremely underweight. Her shoulder bones and chest bones are protruding, her arms are terribly thin and her torso seems super tiny.

P.S.: Apart from her body, the weight loss is not flattering her face (the generous make-up isn’t helping either).

It’s kinda sad, she used to have a great, naturally thin figure on 90210.

Let’s hear your thoughts!

Tweet

Tweet

This can’t be good.

It surely doesn’t look good.

Ironically enough, Rachel seems to think that she’s not too thin:

“We’ve had Audrey Hepburn, we’ve had Twiggy, we’ve had Veruschka, we’ve had Kate Moss.  I’m trying to figure out why I am to blame for skinniness. Truthfully, I’ve never seen myself as being too thin. Sometimes I’ll look at photos and be like, ‘Oh, that’s not a good look. ‘But generally speaking, I’m not too thin.”

1. And is THIS a good look, Rachel?

2. Oh Rachel, you’re showing way more chest bones than those women ever did.

P.S. Don’t mean to be mean, but Rachel really doesn’t look her age – she’s only 38! – and I bet that a little more weight would help.

1 more scary pic after the jump!

Read the rest of this entry →

Tweet