Skinny Jeans Look Better on…Christina Ricci VS Rachel Bilson!
November 14, 2009 in Christina Ricci, Rachel Bilson by Versus
Christina Ricci & Rachel Bilson stepped out in similar outfits, based on hats, cardigans & blue skinny jeans.
Who wears skinny jeans better on this occasion?
Skinny Jeans Look Better on…Christina Ricci VS Rachel Bilson!
Pick your favorite!
See another side-by-side pic after the jump!
Christina Ricci!! she looks soo flipping cute, Rachel looks decent :]
Rachel
Her legs are basically made for skinny jeans. No fat, but just the right amount of curviness. Not that Ricci looks bad, but she just looks normal in them.
Rachel.
Her calves are slimmer and her legs curvier. Christina ricci has narrow hips and straight up and down legs.
Christina’s hips with Rachel’s legs.
This
you stole my idea for a comment
lol i kid, i kid.
Hee hee hee, I’m the comment QUEEN!
I’ll go for Christina.. I dont like saddle(?) bags..
Those are not saddle bags, they’re hip bones.
She’s obviously quite skinny but you can’t shave off bone *possesor of similar build*.
Those aren’t hip bones..lol. The hip is higher than the outer thigh
yeah those CAN’T be hips, they’re too low! def saddle bags…but it’s not her fault, she is def naturally skinny with the tendency to accumulate “fat” there..
Those ARE hip bones. I have the same type of leg and while the UPPER part of the hips is usually visible, peeking out over jeans, that’s the LOWER part of the hip bone. Mine sticks out in the same way, but if you touch it it’s bone under less then 1 cm of skin.
I agree. Those are hip bones. Just place your hand in that area and voila: BONES!
Most people think saddlebags when they see thighs and hips like that.
Yeah, well, most people should stop doing that. It’s hard enough as it is to have some REAL flaw. But calling those saddlebags is grasping at straws.
This girl is slim. she’s SLIM for goodness sake, is there any reason to use such an offensive label because her leg doesn’t look straight up and down? What next, someone mentioning she should check her “chicken wing” forearms, or her “corndog” toes or some other stupid moniker because she has 1-2 inches too many on a specific body part? How bout we call bellies kangaroo pouches every time someone has more then 2 teaspoons of fat in that region. It’s ridiculous.
Sense of propotion, people.
I don’t see what any of you are talking about. Hipbones or saddle bags.
Definetely Rachel. I like Christina but Rachel´s curves win hands down.
rachel! christina’s shape is alright, but i don’t like her face.
No I don’t agree, Christina has the most beautiful face I’ve ever seen. I’m a straight guy who prefers curves, so to be honest, I prefer the Christina of 5-10 years ago. The pics of Christina that wowed me at first were from a premiere appearance of Sleepy Hollow (blue dress, v. dark straight hair). In the pics above, they both seem to have similar legs,except Rachel Bilson has an extra ‘curve’ sticking out near the bum in the top pic. Not unattractive by any means, and she has a beautiful face. I always go by the face first and Christina does it for me, hence my reply here!
RACHEL!!!!Kristy how can you like Christina’s narrow hips?I don’t get u ppl.Rachel’s slim with amazing curves, whereas Christina is just straight
Christina looks great! Rachel looks like she’s got major saddlebags in those jeans…
*Getting sick of skinny jeans*
They look better on Christina, but that might just be because of those atrocious Doc Martin boots. From the waist up I prefer Rachel’s look.
Rachel looks better. The colors/designs go well together. Plus she has great, well-defined hips (something I really like) whereas Christina doesn’t have that and has thighs that are too close together (something I don’t like). I think Rachel’s shape is better for skinny jeans.
lol i on the other hand think that skinny jeans look better on less curvier legs..but that’s just my opinion
so i’d go for christina
Well good thing we have both of them in skinny jeans. Something for everyone!
Rachel.
I vote for Rachel.
I hate skinny jeans and can’t wait for that trend to die!
Still, though, I think Rachel looks better in the jeans than Christina does. They make Rachel’s hips look kind of wide, but Christina’s narrow hips and muscular legs don’t look good in the tight fitting pants.
i prefer rachel. she just looks so good in those jeans. but about those saddle bags, could rachel work them out to lose them. i’ve got them too and i was just wondering. i slimmed down but they’re STILL there.
I vote Christina, skinny jeans looks good on narrow hips. RAchel has saddlebags
no she doesn’t, believe me, I have the same body and I have been skinny enoguh to tell you, they won’t go away, those are bones
Yeah, if it jiggles it is fat.
I like Rachel better though, she is soooo cute!
Rachel, of course
While i like Christina’s body i think skinny jeans are not so flattering on her because her legs are quite straight. Her calves are a bit too thick for skinny jeans; of course, this is a very subjective criteria, but i just hate it when jeans seem to burst on the calves b/c they are thicker than i would expect. Rachel on the other hand has very shapely legs. Her thigh is not thick, it’s actually quite skinny and her calves are super small. And she has that thin yet curvy look going on, she’s quite an eyecatcher.
rachel looks better but chistina dont look bad either
Oooh my 2 favourites!
I can’t possibly choose between them, I think they’re both adorable!
I think I prefer rachels outfit though.
Rachel looks adorable as always.
CHRISTINA
looks much better then Rachel!
Like always …
christina ricci is hottest chic ever born!!!!!!!!!!!although she was hotter before she got too skinny!!!!!!!