Celebs in Short Shorts: Kimora, Sophie and Rachel
July 24, 2010 in Rachel Bilson, Sophie Monk by Versus
Mini-collection: 3 celebs in 3 pairs of short shorts.
Kimora Lee Simmons (35), Sophie Monk (30) and Rachel Bilson (28) all showed off their legs in summery ensembles this week. Who is wearing your favorite outfit?
Take a look at Rachel after the jump!
I think Kimora’s legs look really good — but who wouldn’t with those killer shoes?
Sophie Monk’s legs are funnily shaped IMO. I don’t know, they’re just bent in such a way that I don’t find them attractive (or maybe she’s too skinny?)
Rachel’s legs look good — healthy and strong. It’s just the light being its usual, harsh self
To the people saying that Sophie Monk’s legs are shaped oddly… look at a picture of a skeleton, that is the way the leg bones are shaped to be. If you look at pictures of most models or someone thinner you will notice the rounded gap between their thighs. I think she looks great and that is the body I’d want most for myself.
And I’m sorry but Kimora’s face, especially her chin look quite chubby.
hahah i cant believe you said “look at a picture of a skeleton” in an attempt to prove her wrong!! her point WAS that she was too skinny!!! Your forgetting that a picture of a ‘skeleton’ doesnt have muscles or ligaments shown, so that is NOT what legs should look like; that is if health is your goal. although if you enjoy the emaciated look, then go right ahead, but make sure put down that sandwich, food wont help your cause.
Sophie Monk is so thin
the first one looks the best
Kimora looks amazing.
Sophie’s, actually.
Sophie Monk Sophie Monk Sophie Monk !!!
kimora’s are hawt
I was surprised by how hot Kimora’s look. Don’t like Sophie’s. Too skinny and oddly shaped in my opinion. Rachel’s legs look ok to me, especially considering that she’s a pear.
I like Rachel’s the best. They’re nice and shapely (and not cellulite-y, the light is just playing on them).
Kimora’s are more stronger I think. But she’s wearing high heels so its hard to tell. I also like hers alot – very close to Rachels.
Sophies are too skinny for my taste; her whole body is tbh.
Sophie does look way too skinny here. She just doesn’t have the frame to be super thin. She’s got the body of a 1960s pinup, or a 1990s model: slightly larger build, made for curves. She needs to own that. Gauging by the dress and the poor posture, I think she’s really trying to go for the Alexa Chung brand of heroin chic. But her girl-next-door looks and frame totally give her away.
Couldn’t have said it better myself. I definitely think she’s trying too hard.
Yeah! Total shame, because she could really garner some attention if she exploited her natural beauty. Now is the best time in years for a more traditional, feminine look, thanks in part to Mad Men.
i totally agree
When Sophie Monk was first in the public eye on Australian popstars, there were comments about her being too fat, she would have probably been an AU 12.
She slimmed down a bit but still looked healthy.
But its really sad to see a girl who was once really pretty and healthy look so skinny and fake
Kimora’s legs look the best to me. She’s the oldest and has had three children! Of course, these are all different body shapes and height so it’s just a matter of a opinion and not comparison here.
Rachel, as always. I like her legs- they are nicely shaped and she has curvy hips.
All of them have some great legs!
I like Sophies body
sophies hair looks so much better slightly darker. she is too thin for her body. I like the first ones legs the best
That Sophie Monk girl has the best outfit hands down.
definatley kimora at number 1, sophie at 2 because even though she doesnt have the best shaped legs naturally, she doesnt have any cellulite or anything. She has always had legs like this, its the knees, nothing can be done about it. Kate moss has the same shaped legs and people always rave about how fantastic her legs are….just coz she’s kate moss.
In 3rd place rachel, its not “just the lighting” as people keep trying to insist, Rachel has cellulite like this in all the pap shots of her legs, unless there is some kind of consipiricy agaisnt her, she really does have cellulite and generally out-of-shape legs. Pears get a much easier time on thise site than women with other shapes, i’ve noticed.
agree! pears are really popular at this site and V-shaped are seen as manly and unattractive..
i think rachels legs look really thick and MANLY here. they look like tree trunks with a tree crown (the hips).
she used to be my girl crush but i think she has let herself go
Let herself go?
LMFAO. Wow, that’s so inaccurate. She is TINY. Clearly (because she is a pear shape) her legs are going to be a little thick…that doesn’t mean she’s “let herself go”…
um I think the comment was only meant in terms of the fact that her body used to look much tighter and more toned, whereas now she is looser. So its fair to say she has let herself go a bit, and hey if she doesnt want to spend hours at the gym I have no problem with that, the fact that she is no longer in the shape she used to be is just an honest observation.
yeah, that’s what i ment, im glad that someone gets me
oh i SO agree with you! i’m fine with every body shape but really…i’m kind of sick of everyone condoning a pear shaped girl for having big thights/bottom because of her body shape but then everyone is fine with criticising a v-shaped/lollipop/ruler for having an ‘ewww flat butt!!’ or manly shoulders/no waist when they really can’t do much about it….
I don’t think V-shapes are manly or unattractive at all, and I’m a pear. And being a pear, it’s hard when women are constantly saying that our bodies are “out of proportion” or that our “hips are too big” and “our thighs too chunky”. Personally, I like the fact that people are accepting of pears here. That being said, that doesn’t mean I’m quick to judge other people’s body shapes.
Lovisa, your comment is a little bit hypocritical. You’re complaining about people on this site bashing V-shapes as manly, but then you go and say the same thing about Rachel Bilson?
I think they all look great!
i said that because im sick of comments on this page where people state that pears are the most womanly figure next to hourglasses.
i like all sizes but i think that rachel has let herself go and has started to look worse.
I understand your frustration, I’m sure being called “unwomanly” is similar to me being called “thick”. But we do get our criticisms, truuuust me. It may not be on this site, but I’ve seen it all over the internet!
as i lollipop i don’t take much offense but it’s a little irritating. it’s almost like they are smug
i like the pear shape, but since it’s so prone to looking disproportionate, it “only” looks good at certain weights. the same for v-shaped, lollipops etc.
Do men have small waists with pronounced hips? No. Do they have narrow legs and broad shoulders? Yes. It’s as simple as that. That’s not to say that lollipops, V and ruler shapes can’t have absolutely amazing bodies- sometimes more so then pears- but you can’t deny they’re shaped more like men are. It’s fine to not find pear shapes attractive but to say they’re more masculine looking is completely ridiculous- when is the last time you saw a guy carrying most of his weight in his hips and thighs? This is coming from a ruler shape by the way.
Kimora has gorgeous gams and is definitely my favourite.
Sophie is very thin but I think that her foot placement could be making her legs look strange in the photo. Standing with one’s knees turned in and the calves turned out is generally unflattering.
Mine are most like Kimora’s, only not as long since I’m short, but I’d prefer Sophie’s.
Ohh I love Sophie, the way she’s dressed and her body’s great.
Kimora is too thick for my liking but since she’s always been that way she looks great for her shape!!
[...] Forum var randomnumber=Math.floor(Math.random()*99999999999); document.write(""); Skinny vs Curvy > Hot Models > Agnes Deyn Is Wearing Shorts, Too « Celebs in Short Shorts: Kimora, Sophie and Rachel [...]
What the hell did Sophie do to her face!! O_O
Yes Kimora’s legs look great but I just hate her neck! she carries so much weight in her neck and in her face… it’s the most unfortunate thing! I’d rather have fat legs than a fat neck! (okay I know I sound mean but I just had to speak my thoughts, I always wanted to say this every time I see her on TV)
Rachel is bony and needs a few more meals! Kimora has the best legs, hands down! Sophie’s legs look ok,too much celulite, I suppose!
I think you’re confusing who Rachel and Sophie are…
kimora! kimora! kimora!
yayyyyy! haha.
Kimora….legs are way too thick
rachael’s legs would look better imo if they were toned
sophies haircolour suits her a lot better….facial shots of the same batch of candids were gorgeous and her body is so good
Kimora has to thank a LOT to her height, Sophie’s shorts are hideous with those boots…