Mila Kunis Looks Skinny in BlackBook Magazine
December 2, 2009 in Mila Kunis, Photoshop Job, Then and Now by Versus
Hottie Mila Kunis is inside BlackBook Magazine and she is looking… narrow and skinny.
I don’t know if and what they’ve done, but see the pics in the magazine and see her below in reality and tell us what you think!
She looks particularly tiny in the first 3 pictures. See the rest of this BlackBook shoot after the jump! 
I like this outfit.
she looks amazing in the 1st pic !
Her legs look really long for someone who is petite?
Do you know her exact height/weight Versus?
Most sources say she is 5’3” / 160 cm, I don’t know about her weight.
Gosh, 5’3?! I was thinking atleast 5’8.
She’s beautiful
Having long legs is more about proportion than height. A tall woman with 32 inch legs will look like she has short legs, whereas a petite (short) woman with 30 inch legs will look like she has long legs even if the tall woman’s legs are longer.
her legs look different sizes in almost all these photos….
and yet, her original legs look much more beautiful..
it looks like they elongated her in the first pic…looks so skinny!
but what’s up with all that chest in second pic?i don’t remember those..XD
I agree, esp. the chest, she almost looks pregnant, or her breasts look like what i would’ve imagined them to look like if she was.. Maybe she’s just gained some.
they do look fuller than they used to…i remember reading that she supposedly got a boob job right before “forgetting sarah marshall” but it could just be she’s gained weight and it helped in the chest department. who knows! *shrugs*
i saw her on forgetting sarah marshall..she didn’t had very much going on XD
What a face! this is what i call BEAUTY!
She’s one of the prettiest girls in the show business. Gorgeous face!
they definitely made her legs smaller, especially in the first picture. they gave her a gap between her legs… which is kind of ew on girls who don’t naturally have wide hips.
While they probably made her look thinner, I don’t think there is that much of a difference with reality… if you take someone that is already thin and put on black stockings and very high heels and you take the picture from a distance they are going to look considerably thinner.
I’m surprised about the boobs in the second pic too, she didn’t use to have those, maybe it’s just padding.
I agree. It’s all about the clothes and lighting making her look that way. She is naturally slim, petite, and pretty!
OMG! AMASING!
She’s gorgeous but she looks a little photoshopped.
i think i figure out what the fashion industry is doing to us, but i still can’t figure out why. they take someone we already register as beautiful and then they make them appear super skinny. then we get this nutso math equation in our heads “skinny=beautiful” and we can’t quite figure out whether or not it’s all real so we obsess over it. isn’t that what this website is all about?
gosh, you’ve got it totally right. it’s messing with my head. i mean, i get fixing the really gross things–yellow teeth, zits, jelly rolls, cellulite, major wrinkles, bald spots–you get it. but there is NOTHING wrong with her. why does it have to be about pin-thin legs? no hips? things so many women can’t attain…it can make you crazy.
not even in an ED way. in a “NOTHING I DO WILL EVER BE PERFECT” sort of way. that’s the message. not “be skinny, be beautiful” but “you can’t win.”
Exactly. Because it’s all commercial. Magazines, clothing companies, cosmetics companies, et al want us to feel unattractive so we’ll try even harder and spend even more money to achieve the unattainable “perfection”. That “you can’t win” idea makes us shuck out our hard-earned money to prove them wrong. The average American woman’s rampant self-hatred pads their bottom line. It makes me physically sick.
They’ve elongated, thinned, whored and photoshop drugged her up!
She’s so gorgeous!
And I just totally love her in that 70′s Show. What is she, an apple shape?
She kinda looks like a straight up and and down ruler shape to me. Not much of a defined waist, but she doesn’t have a big but and belly so I wouldn’t call her an apple.
Apple shapes don’t have big butts…
Yes but she has got bigger breasts and (at least from the picture) she looks like she might have a little bit of a belly. Very little. I feel like she’s a slim apple, but an apple none-the-less.
In the first pic she has been shot from below and far away- elongating her. I think they have photoshopped the top of her inner thigh a touch so that she has mannequin – esque legs. She is also wearing super heels which will elongate her legs and overall proportions.
She has gorgeous face and colouring.
Her boobs may look bigger in the papped pic as she is wearing a hoodie zipped open below them and as she is petite her torso is shorter. Or it may have been that time of the month. Or most likely this is her average weight when she is not prepping for a movie/ photoshoot.
Her legs look creepy in that first picture. I know she is wearing really high heels but even so, that isn’t normal in my books. Especially when there isn’t much difference between the width of her calves and thighs.
She was on Craig Fergeson, and looked sickly skinny. Kinda scary.
she probably lost some weight but she probably looks elongated because of her shoes.
She looks really sexy in the first photo. Her legs look perfect. She also has sexy narrow hips.
Mila Kunis has that rare natural beauty. A very talented actress. She is the only reason I always watched That 70′s show. Natural beauty like hers ranks her among the most beautiful of all.
She was filming the movie Black Swan where she dropped to 95 pounds to play the role of a ballerina. The photo shoot was done while she was filming the movie!
Her legs in the first photo are freakishly thin! She looks like a concentration camp victim. Bizarre- almost not human.
She’s so pretty