Mischa Barton’s Bangs – Makeover or Makeunder?
November 25, 2009 in Makeover or Makeunder?, Mischa Barton by Versus
Someone’s got bangs! I doubt she painted her hair, too – her color faded.
Mischa Barton’s Got Bangs – Makeover or Makeunder?
And since we’re already looking at the pictures, which make-up (or no make-up) do you like more on Mischa? Left or right?
See her entire look after the jump!
I thought she always had a fringe, but i see i am mistaken, she looks ok, but i’ve never been a big fan.
Yes, you’re right, she did before – but in the last months she never wore the the bangs on her forehead.
Makeunder. She looks a little like the girl who plays Ginny in Harry Potter.
makeunder she doesn’t need bangs…I like her with smokey eyes
It´s fine but I still think it´s makeunder.
she’s yoyo-ing so much..
To me it’s not over nor under, just a change. She looks good both ways and i don’t really prefer either. (But I think her hair looks a bit dirty and messy in the 1 pic.) I don’t think skinny jeans are flattering on her body, though she looks a lot better than a shorter gal would with a similar body to Mischa and same clothes.
I’m agree! it’s just a change, she looks good with both styles.
I think she looked best with Blonde Hair
She looks best with no bangs, some make up and lighter color hair…period.
Some people look more beautiful when they are fuller (i.e Hillary Duff), but for Mischa, I can’t help thinking she looks prettier when she is thinner. I do not mean her skeleton look, but somewhere in between. I know I’m going to be dissed for saying this, but she can afford to lose a couple of kgs to show her beautiful face structure.
completely agree.
It’s boring. Make under
Makeunder. But I think that’s partly the lack of makeup, she looks a lot younger. I do like her with a fringe though, it suits her. I’m not used to seeing her without the smokey eyes though, maybe that’s why I think it looks less than good…
I kind of like the bangs. As for the makeup, the fresher face looks better to me.
She is wearing quite a bit of makeup in the second picture, her eyes just aren’t as dark. I think she is more striking without the bangs and smokey eyes.
Meh.. not her best look. But then again–these are candid photos taken by the vicious paparazzi. Catching her on her ” Not so hot looking day”. Anyone would probably look “unglamorous” if they had their picture taken on the street, looking casual.
On to her body, well, she’s shed her “That super hot chick from the O.C” status, but she still has a decent figure. A little puffy in the face and her thighs are pretty noticeably untoned. But she carries the rest of her weight pretty good.
Hmm, I have to agree with some of the other comments – could go either way but with the bang pics being of a casual/off-guard nature, it’s hard to compare. I’m actually leaning more towards the bangs as I think they make her look a little younger, less harsh and add a little cuteness.
at least she doesn’t look that used anymore
she actually looks quite good at the moment
(I like her always, but as we all know she had some …problems recently)
She used to have bangs before, didn’t she?
I like her with bangs, but she doesn’t look as pretty as usual on these bangs pictures
Makeover
neither.
definitely a make-under!
she is one of those girls who look way better when they are thin, not anorexic, just skinny. As someone mentioned before, it brings out her beautiful face structure, especially her amazing cheekbones!
On that 2nd pic she looks like a loony
Makeunder.
i think she looked way better on the o.c with blonde hair and she was alittle thinner she just looks washed up to me lately she was pretty a few years ago maybe if she wasn’t partying all the time she may get her looks back and not look so washed up
forgot to say both she hair styles suit her
her body isn’t too bad but she doesn’t dress to flatter it.
First of all she should wear longer tops so that her hips arn’t so exaggerated and sencondly she shouldn’t wear ankle boots, they cut up her legs and make them look chunky. A pair of pumps would make the world of difference.
This is definitely a makeunder. Blind people need to stop commenting on this website. Of course, it’s also quite hypocritical to say that she needs to lose a few lbs because I’m sure if anyone who commented on this website was actually photographed the way that a celebrity like Mischa Barton is they’d look like an obese, rosy-cheeked, chain smoking cow. And Mischa does not. She looks thin in person. Celebs like Miranda Kerr are invisible in person. They don’t exist.
make under.. she looks the best with just natural make up, and no bangs.
she looks younger on the right. marissa is one of the girls who do need a decent make-up to look great – she convinces mostly through her charming attitude not through her looks i think.
That is really an unfornatunate bunch of pictures . . . I think I’d need to see the new hair with similar make-up to totally judge. I can’t tell whether it’s the hair or lack of make-up that makes her face look weird.