Leighton Meester Does GQ
November 19, 2009 in Leighton Meester by Versus
So considering Leighton’s latest looks, outfits, make-ups, videos and sessions with men’s magazines, I think it’s clear that she’s trying to construct herself a nice (?) little “sexy image”.
Take a look at Leighton in lingerie in the latest issue of GQ!
I am truly not a fan of the first picture on the next page.
See the rest!
)
arghhhhh i am so sick of this girl! She’s such a tryhard whore!
“oooh look at me, spreading my legs to reveal my vajayjay to the camera, i’m such a sexy girl”.
Please, Leighton meester, STICK TO ACTING. As if that gossip wasn’t sexed-up enough.
And now she’s trying to be a musician? what a joke.
**gossip girl
She has a nice figure. But I agree about that picture with the leather bodysuit – it is kind of icky. I think she went a bit too far there.
I AGREE. not good.
Eh, it’s GQ, what do people except. A little princess suit with an ankle lenght moomoo?
Good for her if she wants to do the sexxed up diva, this ain’t some kind of puritanical society. Ohwait…
Because that’s all there is, tiny black leather underwear or huge white gowns… But i get your point. She seems to be pushing it a bit too hard, but what she wants to do is up to her, i can see why one would want to do the sexy pics once they’re famous, almost every celeb does, and it is kinda fun, being sexy. Whatever. I think she looks quite nice.
I’m not a fan of any of those photos, they are just… they lack something. Maybe it’s her face, she looks exactly the same on all of these photos.
Yeah i agree, as an actress she should be able to deliver more that she does here. There is something lacking in these photos, dunno what, but it makes the pictures somewhat mainstream and boring.
Yeah, she’s definitely trying too hard lately! She should have been more playful or something. Sexy doesn’t always mean angry sex face!
I don’t like it. It just looks weird with Leighton as the model. Maybe if were someone else…
I know the girl who plays Vanessa (who is so boring, I can’t recall her actual name) did a spread for some men’s magazine and hers was freaking hot! Leighton can’t seem to pull it off, though.
same face in every photo…
it’s getting boring
so hot for a little princess of the upper east side….
put it away love!
She is very cute..
its GQ what do you expect..i love her and she is amazing and beautiful..and its not her fault that the picture with her legs spread is in there..on photo shoots there are such things as directors and its not like leighton picked which pics made the mag.
Unless the directors strapped her down and physically pried her legs apart, then yes, it’s her “fault” (I would say “choice”).
She isn’t some plastic doll that doesn’t have the ability to make decisions. I assume she, to some extent, liked the idea or at the very least, didn’t object.
Whenever Leighton is trying to be sexy, it always looks so forced and unnatural. She has a really innocent, angelic looking face, so she doesn’t have the features to be sexy easil. When she is posing for magazines like GQ she looks like a little kid trying on her mommy’s make up. Really out of place.
I couldn`t have said it better!
I agree!!! There’s something wrong with her face! It’s not like she’s unnattractive, but it’s just not believable…it’s boring looking. I agree with Casey. She needs to leave the vamp to someone else–there’s a lot of value in being the innocent kitten, too…she should realize that.
i think she looks hot!
I don’t care what anyone says!
Geez, talk about a porno pose on the couch and chair! Waaaay over the line heading toward trashy.
….Oh yeah, she’s been there already. Didn’t she actually release a porno with her ex boyfriend? I’m sure she was behind that and hoped for the fame it brought Paris and Kim…..
Oh my ..
What has happened to being a lady?
No one seems to value this anymore.
I don’t care if it’s for a photo shoot, a stage costume, a music video, or a Halloween get-up, young women these days show it all off and think nothing of it.
I cannot think of a single young starlet or singer who is a lady.
Sad.
“I cannot think of a single young starlet or singer who is a lady.
Sad.”
Really? I can think of plenty.
Anne Hathaway, Alicia Keys, Natalie Portman, Raven Symone, Mandy Moore, Kate Winslet.
Unfortunately, it seems the ones who don’t run behave like the Paris Hiltons and Lindsay Lohans of the world don’t get any attention, so they’re overlooked.
I think Natalie Portman is the essence of class.
I would have agreed with you if I hadn’t seen her in the film “Closer.” I lost a lot of respect for her after that.
Wow.
Hot.
she is hot, but it just looks like she’s trying waaay too hard in these shots.
forced sexy is not sexy to me.
It’ such a shame that she decided to growl at the camera in each picture, because she has the body and face that were made for men’s magazines. In that first picture and the one where she’s unzipping that leather body suit with her legs wide open – her face is just plain ugly.
i like the bottom picture, she looks lovely and so does her bottom!
the rest just look weird and the leather one, OMG
umm i am going to put this in capital letters cus i feel strongly about this:ON THE LAST PHOTO,IT LOOKS LIKE TWO DIFFERENT BODIES,OMFG LIKE REALLY,THE ONE IN THE MIRRIOR LOOKS SO MUCH SKINNIER THAN THE OPPSITE,LEIHTONS LEGS ARE NOT THAT SKINNY.SHE A HEALTHY-FIT LOOKING GIRLS THAT HAS A GREAT BODY,SO I DNT GET WHY THEY STILL PHOTOSHOP HER LIKE ITS SO BAD TO HAVE A LITTLE MEAT ON YOUR BONES.
ILY LEIGHTON,STAY PREETTYYYY.
AND PS,THOSE ARE NOT HER ARMS!!!!
I completely agree!! If you look at the last picture her thighs in the mirror have way to much space between them. If you look at her butt (which looks great) you will see that her thighs are touching! and then in her’reflection’ her thighs are way to skinny. There is no upper thigh fat, where they def. should be.
honestly photoshops ruins self-esteem, young girls are trying to look like women who doesn’t even exist…
I’m on Leighton’s side, here. I like that she is exploring her sexuality more.
I like her body..but not her face.
The last pic is my favourite…but still,not her face
We know she’s sexy and has a rockin’ bod. She doesn’t have to throw it in our faces! ahaha
i think leighton has an amazing figure….
does anyone know how she got it??
Yeah she’s good looking.
BUT WHAT THE HECK!
okay, mabye i’m wrong, but WHAT is with the whole sticking their crotch in the camera? Megan fox did that too in a newer post.
JUst, ugh not good looking.
who knew she had a butt?! i didn’t think so at first (because i don’t dress anything like they do on g.g.) but her body is very similar to mine…
Nice ass
i really dont get her appeal =S especially facially. Body is average imo…not particularly toned…just skinny…and her bum is quite flat…unless they just airbrushed it like that but even then its still flat
ok i actually like leighton, but unfortunately her face is the issue in these photos. her body looks hot, like a body a girl can achieve, but her expression sux.
I don’t see why everyone is calling her a slut because of these pictures. Is it wrong to want to feel sexy and celebrate an amazing figure every once and a while? Leighton looks great, and these photos are nothing compared to anything you’d find in Playboy. Being a woman is something to be proud of.
I dislike these pictures, not because they feature Leighton in lingerie posing provocatively, but because I don’t find them attractive at all. She’s really gorgeous, but I’ve never thought of her as “sexy” (skimpy, lace, suggestive etc). Also, it seems that she is trying too hard, and I think that sophisticated sexy is the best kind of sexy for Leighton. Leave the lingerie to the Victoria’s Secret models, please. She just doesn’t seem to be “sexy” naturally IMHO.
Oh my GOD guys, this is GQ.
Look at any other GQ covers. Besides, you think Leighton has a choice in what she gets to wear and such? When you sign on to do a shoot, they do your makeup, hair, clothing, and ask you to pose they way THEY want you to. God, guys. I model- I should know.
I like all of them but the leather outfit one- the director of the shoot really did screw up there. The first photo, though, is AMAZING- they did go absolutely RIGHT there. She does have a nice ass, though- the mirror image was absolutely Photoshopped, but I don’t think she butt was.
Her face is pretty, too. She is beautiful- not a wh*re.
Obviously, I’m a huge Leighton fan, haha.
Man i’m so sick of women who just like to bag on other women purely because of low self confidence and jealousy. Just cause she’s hot and famous girls are just so quick to judge and call her trash or a w****. It’s not like she’s fully taking her clothes off. Get over it. As if you wouldn’t do a shoot like this if you were famous and got asked to do it.
wtf is up with this? why can’t actresses just be actresses. do you really need to cheapen yourself and show that you’re sexy? it’s PATHETIC.