Kim Kardashian Poses for New Calendar in a Bikini
February 28, 2009 in Celebrity Weight & Measurements, Kim Kardashian by Versus
Just earlier today we admired a skinny girl in a bikini, namely supermodel Alessandra Ambrosio. Now it’s curvy girl’s time! And what curvy girl can do a better job in a bikini than Kim Kardashian, who was kind enough to post all these pics on her blog for our delight.
I’ve been recently asked to re-post Kim’s measurements – well, according to the same source (Kim’s personal blog) her voluptuous figure measures:
Height: 5’2” and 1/2 (157 cm)
Weight: 117 lbs. (53 kg)
Jeans size: 27
Bust: 34 (86 cm)
Waist: 26 (66 cm)
Hips: 39 (99 cm)
Lots of pics after the jump! Enjoy!
I love her and I think she’s very very sexy but I find it very hard to believe that she has a 26 inch waist and I don’t believe she weighs 53 kg.
I am in no way saying she’s fat, and I think she looks gorgeous.
Why can’t she have a 26 inch waist? She is a short girl with a short toros. Sounds perfectly plausible to me.
there is no way she weighs 117lbs, she looks to be about 130lbs.
she looks amazing but i just don ‘t see how that large of a bum can
get into a size 27.
Yeah, she is full of crap.
I third… hell, since we are telling 15 pound lies, I’m 120! Screw WW, I’m done with it! Yay!
On a non-sarcastic note, agree with Anna about the girl in the striped shirt.
agreed! if we’re going to lie about 15 pounds.. that makes me 100. i find it hilarious, because i am the size and weight that kim claims to be.. and i look NOTHING like that. i mean, she looks good. i wish i had a curvy butt like that.. and it’s not about different body types. i’m also a pear. i have thicker legs and teeny tiny scrawny torso.
i think she’s hot, but probably not 117lbs. on a side note, the girl in the shorts and stripped tank has really nice legs.
I love how anna, kate, and anya all claim to know kim kardashian’s weight better than she does! It’s so obnoxious.
i think kim is so gorgeous but 27 is a uk 8-10 an have u seen the build of someone who is an 8? in no country is she an 8
she is lying…not 117 lbs. her butt alone weighs that much.:(
lol =)
yea but she’s very short! so it’s very possible, maybe 120 I believe her.
btw in the first pic her legs look short
I love that pastel dress and she suits her!
SHES HOT, If i were I guy.. Id totally fuck her. HOWEVER. bitch is a fat lier. she does not have a 26 inch waist nor does she wear size 27. Id say 28 inch waist and wears 29′s. kim.. why the lies? you should be proud of your ghetto booty.. everyones seen it.. and KNOWS.. that sucka would NEVER fit in size 27. NEVER. keep dreaming you crazy bitch!
she still probaly looks a 1000X better than you no matter how much she weighs jealous bitch
Remember she is only 5ft2.
A 26 inch waist on a 5ft2 girl looks about the same size as a 28 inch waist on a 5ft6 girl.
Just something to bear in mind.
Then I believe it is plausible that she is a 26 inch waist.
I was 28/29 and I am 5′ 6 when I was 130 lbs. Nice to know she has same size hips as me though! I think she is hot and i live the fact that she is not stick thin but rather curvy and toned.
exactly. not fat. just not 26 inch waist…. no way!
Why her waist cannot be 26 inches?? It´s TINY!
Her waist isn’t that tiny.
Her ass is just that big
If kim kardashian is a 27.. then Kiera Knightley is just covering up her double D’s. hahahaha
She is beautiful and has the best body out there but I do believe she is probably 125lbs. 117ibs is to small for her gorgeous curves.
I love her, she is gorgeous! But now way that she weights only 117 lbs for being 5’2″! I am 5’2″ and weight 106 lbs and I am thin, so as much as I love you Kim, we are not buying it, stop pretending! I will say that her sister Kourtney’s got those measurements!
I don’t understand why she will lie about it because everybody think that her body is gorgeous the way it is! She looks amazing in those pictures, love the bronzer : p
She might be 120lbs.. She’s very short and she might have a small bone structure. I’m 5,8 1/2 and I am pretty slim, my measurements are 89-61-91…but if I tell someone that my weight is about 61 kilos, nobody ever belives it ’cause I’m just big-boned…So I tend to belive her….
Kim can say that she’s 5,8 and a blonde… this things arn’t that important, important is that she looks very hot and she doesn’t have that “feed me” model allure
)))
She looks pretty, but there is no way she is 117 pounds.
who cares about the weight or waist measurements, she looks pretty damn good to me!!
I think she’s beautiful and has a fantastic body.
Though I have to agree with everyone who is commenting on the weight and measurements. As a 5’2″ 108lb woman with almost identical measurements (apart from the butt!) I really find it hard to believe when I look nothing like her. Also with her weight of 117lbs… I just cannot believe that for me to have her big boobs, big butt and all the extra meat on her limbs (compared to me) I would only need 9lbs more. I’ve been called anorexic on more than one occasion and I don’t think 9lbs off of Kim’s body would warrant such comments!
9lb of fat just concentrated on the butt and boobs can make a person look a lot more curvy. I don’t think people realise just how much fat 9lb looks like.
i think she looks amazing but shes def more than 117 lbs.
ok first off, im so sick of kim lying about her weight. the reason this especially pisses me off is because I too am 5 2 and a half….and wear a size 29 jeans and i wear about 135. so how on earth does kim wear 27? its just not happening ppl do you know how narrow your hips have to be and you need to have practically no ass. go on to any websites like shopbop.com and they have the girls model the jeans in size 27 so no kim the only 27s you wear are superstretch which she admits or with a sewn in 27 tag. i think shes beautiful but someone being of similar body shape is just very annoyed that she has to streeeeeetch the truth! lol
different brands are different sizes
why not, i wear size 26 or even lower, and my measures is very, very similar with kim’s. Also have a big but, skinny lags, small waist, and weight 52kg with haigh of 163. Belive me it is so possible!
weigh***
People this is a photo and it is possible to be the size. Maybe she lied about a few vanity pounds. I am 5’1 1/2 inches and I weight 120 and measurements are 34-26-37. She is probably measuring her natural waist which is small. Just because you are short does not mean you are skinny. Some of us have curves and I eat healthy and workout. Only her butt is big not her whole body and I wear 28 jeans normally without stretch.
YOU’RE ALL SHEEP.
copying what each person says…
>_>
World Swimwear has some cute swimsuits!
I believe Kim’s measurements, but like the majority of you I don’t believe that she weighs only 117lbs. I would put her at 125-130 minimum, but that’s not fat! I am 5’5 1/2 and measurements of 35-29-42. But I am a US 8, so she could be a 4/6 easy!!
she looks good and any skinny chick can have curves like kim. maybe not a big ass but curves. personally i don’t think she’s lying, although it’s crazy that she’s a size 27 with a big ass. we’re the same height and weigh almost the same but i don’t fit no size 2. but hey she did that video to prove that she wears size 27 in jeans and it fit. overall, she looks good.
honeslty I could care less about her measurements is that really a person is. girl is crazy beautiful with an amzingly hot body that most would kill for, curves in the right places and she has a pretty face to back it up and ppl be complaining about her sizes like it matters!
Looks like we have some jealous people here. If she has a 27 inch waist then of course her ass will look huge in proportion, that doesn’t mean she can’t be the size or weight she states. 5’2 is small and having such a small waist will make your bust and hips appear larger but it is still possible at that height for them to be smaller overall than someone of average or above average height as they will have a larger overall frame. It’s all about proportion, people’s bodies are different. I am only 5’1 and have similar proportions to Kim. Just because you might be 5’2 and weigh 130lbs and have a bigger waist size, doesn’t mean everyone at this height does.
I think she looks great…..curvy and healthy….I don’t get what peoples issues are with her.
i think she looks incredible, but again she is not 127 lbs. i have smaller measurements than her (note: i have smaller measurements than she DOES, not than she says she does) and i am 130. i wish she wouldn’t lie, it just perpetuates the idea that everybody needs to appear tiny, and thats not true. she’s voluptous, everybody knows it, so if you’re going to publish youre weight and size dont deceive people.
Excuse me but my measurements are very similar to hers (34-26-38) and I’m 5ft2 and 125lb. So what if you have smaller measurements at 130lb, not everyone carries their weight the same as you. And perhaps you are taller or heavier framed.
If someone is short, light framed and curvy you can bet people will overestimate their weight every time. It sucks.
She has to way much more than that. There is no way she can fit that butt in a size 27 jean, impossible.
I dont get it why people are saying ‘There is no way she can fit that butt in a size 27 jean, impossible.”
NO ONE said she fits into a size 27 jeans. They sadi her WAIST is 27 inches. which it could b. But maybe she has to wear the 28 or 29 jeans to fit her butt in. Who knows. No one said she wears a size 27!!!!
Actually, Kim herself claims that she wears a size 27, and she posted a video (you can find it on youtube) showing her squeezing into several pairs of jeans to prove it. It’s kind of funny, b/c first she basically calls all of the people who don’t believe her haters or something like that, but at one point in the video she says something like, ‘who cares what size jeans you wear, it’s so stupid’ (not an exact quote). Uhh, obviously you care Kim, b/c you posted a video to prove it. Personally, I don’t buy it, b/c a couple of years (and a few pounds) ago, my measurements were 34B-26-38.5, and I could barely fit into size 29′s. Of course, in a lot of other brands I wore a size six, so maybe I should try to find stretch jeans in brands that use vanity sizing like she does.
Wow, sorry this was such a long post!
Actually it does say jeans size 27…but who cares. Shes beautiful, fabulous, with a TO DIE FOR BODY…..i am on the thinner side and i would kill to look like that..curvy and voluptuous…unfortunately…when you have no boobs to speak of and all your weigh goes to your ass..it looks weird…Keep it up KIM..you are FABULOUS
I’ve seen Kim in person many times (I live in LA) and she’s TINY. I am 5’1 and weigh 106 lbs and our bodies are comparative in structure. I don’t doubt for a second that she weighs 117 pounds. Her bone structure is small, and her waist is very, very small. Her boobs and butt are the only things on her body that are different from mine and I can’t imagine if I had her curves that I’d weigh more than 117-120 either. Plus, hasn’t she lost a ton of weight? She maybe was 125-130 and probably lost 10 lbs.
I think she looks gorgeous.
117 lbs .. yeah f***ing right!
I don’t see why so many people don’t believe that she’s 117 lbs. She’s 5’2″ and has a pretty slender bone structure so I think this is quite a realistic weight figure (give or take a couple of pounds) personally
I agree with Eva
Well we all know she is very hypocritical.
but she did prove she could fit in a size on video evidence. so maybe we have to connsider that. i mean she did go through all that trouble.
personally, I don’t thionk she should go around proving her size b/c irregardless she looks good.she is beautiful.if she really a size 2 , good her. if she knows thsts all that matters…
K
She is a liar, she is extremely SHORT, and somewhat chubby:
i do agree with her height, but not with the waist (she’s fatter), nor with the size (she’s rather 32)
I’ve already seen her for real at Apple (NYC), and she was….. physically DISAPPOINTING!!
Get real, do you have any idea how BIG a 32 inch waist looks on a 5ft2 person. If she is measuring the smallest part of her waist it could easily be 26 inches, if she is measuring around the belly button then maybe as much as 28-30 inches but certainly no more. But if you didn’t know already a woman’s waist is typically measured at that narrowest point, not around the navel.
Superba-aceasta este parerea mea pentru Kim Kardashian. Ea este un vis frumos pentru orice barbat adevarat. Eu o iubesc enorm de mult .
It is very possible to be 5ft2 with those measurements. Not a lot of muscle, small frame, low bone density. She is a small skinny girl with a big butt and people have a tendancy to over estimate the weight of people with curves, i.e. boobs and butt. I’m 5ft2 with very similar measurements and weigh 125lb but I work out a LOT so if she says she is 117lb then I believe her.
The only thing I do question is that she can fit her 39 inch butt into a size 27 (US size 4). Because my butt is 38 inches I need a 28 (US size 6). But I guess all sizes are different depending on the store.
Wow, she looks awesome in some of those pics..but she is not 117. I am 5’10″.. and weigh 140. My measurements are 38C-26-38. I am a size 4…HELLO?? I have a friend that is 5’5″ and weighs 120…she is a size 2…and NOT THAT CURVY Let’s get real here. Also her boobs look bigger then a 34..is that 34D? The point is she looks so f’ing great why lie about your size and weight. It’s not like women do not know what 117 looks like!! Come on now!!
I agree she has to weigh about 130!!
Hey, bear in mind she is only 5ft2 and you are 5ft10 so you can’t really compare weights.
Also my measurements are 34-26-38 and I’m 125lb at 5ft2. So I have pretty much the same size and shape as Kim except I’m probably a lot more muscular than she is so I doubt she is going to weigh more than me.
Just because she has big butt and boobs doesn’t necessarily mean she has to weigh more, that’s just an illusion. It was the same with Marilyn Monroe, people put her at 140lb-160lb because of her curves when really she was about 120lb-130lb. Again not a very muscular woman with a small frame, just curvy where it counts.
I don’t see how she would fit into a size 27 in jeans either.
That just doesn’t make any sense to me. My best (girl)friend is around 90 cm around her hips, and she cannot fit into a size 27 in jeans, she could do that when she weighed less. So Kim must be bigger than that.
I do like this girl. she’s always so stylish and looks great !
LOL If Kim is 117 then I’m 80. All of you people that are saying it’s possible because she’s 5’2 are blind! G
irl has thunder thighs, bust, and a big butt. She’s at least 130. I believe her waist measurement but I think it might be 2 inches more than that.
Actually it does say jeans size 27…but who cares. Shes beautiful, fabulous, with a TO DIE FOR BODY…..i am on the thinner side and i would kill to look like that..curvy and voluptuous…unfortunately…when you have no boobs to speak of and all your weigh goes to your ass..it looks weird…Keep it up KIM..you are FABULOUS..http://www.7la-alkon.com/vb
i fit into a US size 6 and im 5’8 my measurements are 34-26-40
kim can definantly be that size!!!!!
Actually this is correct, as i’ve seen her in person. A lot of us don’t realize that body fat percent is the one thing to take into consideration. Although her weight may seem small she does have a higher body fat percentage making her look bigger than she does. Meeting Vanessa Hudgens I always thought she looked bigger in pictures and TV but when she entered the gym she looked like a 12 year old and maybe weighed 90lb. Remember the camera’s aren’t forgiving.
PPS: Oh, and I could NOT wear a 27, since that converts to a 4? I believe in American sizing. In true sizing I wear a 12-14, but in the vanity sizing you find in stores, I wear a 6-8, generally more of an 8 then a 6. So while I think her weight is plausible, I do think that she is definitely lying about her pant size, why I have no idea.
Uh, I do think her jeans is kind of plausible honestly. I’m of the same height and very similar measurements and I wear about size 29. She’s slightly lighter with a slightly smaller waist line than me. So …. why not?
WOW such catiness out there!!! I am about 5’4 and weigh 125. My body had been compared to Kim’s, which btw is a huge compliment!! I love being curvy. Think my husband loves it more. My waist is a tad smaller than hers, but i have a short torso so finding jeans that fit my behind AND waist is sooooo hard. Not to mention shirts that fit correctly. I completely believe her measurments. Stop hating and get over it.
I second that last comment. I have almost exact measurements and height as Kim and I weigh 115 cuz my booty is slightly smaller. So it’s plausible. Let’s all leave her alone.
ARE YOU KIDDING ME?
Skinny all the way.
Kim is pretty, but the CANNOT be compared to Alessandra Ambrosio or any VS Model. Alessandra can rock a bikini 34567567 56784565678 567856786578 5675676578 4657 times better than Kim Kardashian can. Thank you, and goodbye.
Im 5’2 im 117 pounds she actually looks thinner than i do, i of course dont have a booty like she does but for real everyone needs to stop hating lol she aint lieing about nothin when your short weight looks different 5 or ten pounds make a huge difference!! you can really tell rather than on someone who is taller you barly even notice
She does have a flat stomach but not much of a waist.
That is apparent in the first photo in which you can see that she is broad in the waist as well as in the hips.
To me I would say her waist is probably at least 30 inches. And that isn’t big. But 26 inches? There is no way girl!
This is coming from a woman with that tiny type of waist myself. And I also have hips. When you have a 25/26 inch waist and hips, you really can see the definition in your waist. It is like POW! And with her that is not the case.
She is all she says she is….how is it hard to believe morons….I am a 26 and her waist look just like miner derrrr
hey she is 117 or 120 bt nt 130 of course nt…im a 34 26 38 and im 5 ft 2 as well ..
im 127lbs and ive got a bit of a tummy bt she has a flat tummy cz she is thinner than me so i find it possible that she is 117 lbs..
I weigh 300 and have the same measurements bahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
38 25 41, 5′ 3″ everyone thinks I weigh alot less but im 136/8…on my skinny days
i love Kim but y does she need to lye what size she is. i am the SAME measurements as her 34,26,39 (and have a bum)and i am 5.4ft and i weight 132lbs. So there is no way she weights 117lbs even if i am 1.5inches taller than her. She must be at least 123lbs-127lbs.
I think sasha’s lying. 0.o sounds accurate for kim..actually, by my calculations, kims measurements should be bigger. anyway she’s hot. case closed.