Kim Kardashian in Ocean Magazine
June 13, 2009 in Kim Kardashian, Photoshop Job by Versus
Whoa, how tiny they made her waist in the first pic (and while they were hard at work, they also cropped her hips just a little)!
So anyway, here’s Kim in Ocean Magazine, together with her curves, legs, cleavage, thick belts and loads of hair.
Do you like the shoot?
2 more Kims posing prettily for Ocean Magazine after the jump!
i never thought i would ever say that but… wow. they either went oberboard with photoshop or she lost some really significant amount of weight. minus the last pic, where she looks like her curvy-just-slimmer-self, on the others she seems unbelievably slim!
and i must say she looks great on the cover, i usually hate her facial expressures. and the bangs also do her justice.
I definitely think they went overboard with the photoshop. Just look at her left leg in the first picture. It looks so weird!
They photoshopped her waist to the point that it makes her thighs look chunky esp in the first pic. Am liking the fringe though.
so photoshopped
oh god! the first photo should probably be called an illustration! it has way too much editing for my likes she just look so damn fake in my opinion!
wow they even photo shopped her calf muscle. they airbrushed her leg so much it lends in with the wall in the background. lol
overboard
I like how curvy Kim is; she is like JLo version 2.0 (the new younger, curvier version lol), showing that booties can be a good thing. I wish someone with curves like that had become popular when I was younger so I wouldn’t have grown up hating my butt. However, Kim as a “personality” or whatever the hell she is, bugs the crap out of me.
kim’s face looks like a cross between keira knightley and scarlett johansson in the 1st picture.
It’s so hard to tell what she *really* looks like. I mean you see one pic where she has cellulite, then you see a possibly-photoshopped candid where her thighs look great, then you see this where it looks like they put her head on someone else’s body. And then you see her in person, and she gives a new definition to “curvy”. Pictures are so deceiving these days.
I think Kim can only dream that she actually looked like this. And for once, i completely agree with Miranda. And for Kim it seems that seeing her in real life is the only way of finding out how she really looks like.
Oh dear, I love Kim so much but yeah, they over did it with the photoshop. Yikes!
The first picture is awful, too much editing for my taste, but I do like the the others.
god how i hate this woman.
who is she?
I agree.
I think the first and second contrudict each other as to her thighs. Because they made her waist look so tiny in the first he thighs look bigger and they look way photoshopped in the second, even compared to the forth. The pics almost look like 4 different bodies all with her head….I agree impossible to know “real” her
In the second picture, they photoshopped out a crotch-shot I guess and blended her leg in. It looks like playdough.
yea there’s some bad photoshopping in the 1. and 2. pic. Like u’ve said : the leg blending in w/ the wallpaper, looks like i’d've been w/ paint-shop, and the second w/ the crotch smurred wierdly like that… at least do it well if you’re gonna alter the person!
Yeah im tired of the photoshopping they do on Kim. She said she LOVES her curves and her butt…but everytime we see her see is photoshopped. I don’t get it. If you love your curves and love yourself than show your true body. I love her but I am tired of the flip flopping. One minute she loves her body and the next minute she wants to lose weight.
I don’t think it’s really up to her!
Alot of stars have had the living daylights photoshopped out of them and haven’t been happy about it. Can’t remeber many off the top of my head, but when they gave Keira KNightley a nice set of boobs for a film poster she wasn’t pleased.
It’s up to the magazines, the models/stars don’t have much say in it.
Unfortunatley it seems as if you have ‘curves’ they have to be absolutley perfect. I mean.. stunningly symmetrical, not a ounce of fat out of place and a teeny tiny waist for you to be deemed okay to appear in an article claiming you love your curves. It’s as if you have to be either stick thin or have almost unrealistic barbie doll curves to be seen as normal!
Yeah that’s true Belle. They really don’t have a say in it. I think the magazine should have left her alone because she looks fantastic…but like you said you have to be pretty much “perfect” for that to happen. And unfortuantly “perfect” in the editors eyes means “no curves”. Sad.
Photoshopped to the max, she looks so long and lean and we know she isn’t.
is it just me, or she’s not wearing any panties in the second pic?
I can barely distinguish the line between her legs…
WEIIIIIIIRD crop
Too much airbrushing, enough already!
I want to see the REAL Kim, she is gorgeous without all the enhancements…..or ‘de-enhancements’ should I say lol.
I don’t like these pictures. Too much photoshop these days. Some of these celebrities don’t look real anymore. The only thing I like about these pics is Kim’s hair.
She does look photoshopped, although a corset can do wonders to create a defined waist. She is obviously wearing a corset in many of these pictures which could explain the small waist.
Looks great i think…www.missperfectblonde.com
I agree that the 1st photo is poorly photoshopped – her left leg looks so much thinner than her right. Fake!
She has the same expression in every picture. I wish we could return to the days when models monopolized magazine covers and layouts.
Her pictures lack personality, which seems to be a reflection of her in real life.
nahhh she looks heavy not a good look.
omg, that first picture is HORRIBLE. can they airbrush anymore obviously??
Could she seriously be a 2?