Kim Kardashian Left Her Make-up at Home
August 29, 2009 in Celebrities Without Make-up, Kim Kardashian by Versus
… yes, she did.
Definitely a big difference - So what do you guys think?
Here’s her complete casual look (umm… “No paparazzi”?):
See one more after the jump!
She’s still beautiful…with or without it =]
She’s still ugly with or without make-up
Yeah, cause you’re god’s gift.
imoa, that made me laugh. Anyways though, I think she looks great considering how god awful some celebs look without the makeup! She’s pretty,
.
Of course I’m not perfect, never even said I was, but I’m not walking around like a skank, having my own TV show (which is boring as hell by the way)…
I’m sorry but she’s not beautiful. Jessica Alba, Megan Fox, Jessica Stroup, Natalie Portman, Adriana Lima…that’s what I call beautiful.
But you know, that’s a matter of taste I guess !
yea everyone has their own presteptions of whats beautiful.
beauty is in the eye of the beholder, which is one of the things i love the most about life. one mans trash is another mans treasure.
i do think kim is stunning tho. absolutly beautiful with the dark skin and dark eyes. im norwegian so ill never look like that haha.
x
Yeah, but Megan Fox has had a lot of work done. She’s beautiful now, but she paid for it.
i hate to but i have to agree with you. i never thought i would hear kim kardashian and ugly in the same sentence till today. the no make up is 1 thing but the blonde hair is what spoils her the most. it washes her out completely. if she still had dark hair she wouldn’t look as bad. body looks hot though!
I agree! ugly with or without. and overexposed.
She needs to stay out of the sun (or lay off the blotchy self tanner). Her face looks very discolored and uneven. And its funny how she bleached her eyebrows too. I guess its the only way to not make the blonde hair such a stark contrast but that must be hell to upkeep. I didnt realize she had bad skin (her foundation must be amazing)!
The blotchiness can also be hyper-pigmentation and NOT sun damage. Especially since she’s non-white. I would get marks like that after having spots as a teenager even if I did not touch them or anything. Some blotches lasted for days, some for years.
I think her skin is actually pretty amazing…
I mean, have you seen other celebrities without make-up? There are a few blemishes on her chin, but y’know, no ones perfect.
And of course her make-up looks good, it’s got a beautiful face to work with.
she looks like she’s had her lips done
does anyone else think this was a sad attempt at getting some publicity attention? her sisters have been hogging up all the spotlight (pregnancy, weight loss). i mean really, KIM KARDASHIAN forget to put make up on?!?! never.
doubt she liked being second best since she is used to being the golden child
yeah, seriously, we’re talking about the girl who piles it on at the beach! sees fishy to me
Other than looking a bit blotchy/uneven, she looks very good.
this woman is NOT that attractive.. with or without the pounds of makeup she applies. her skin looks bad.. when you have that much money and are in the constant “limelight” your face skin should NOT look that rough.
I like her both with and without makeup. I look sickly without it, too. The only thing that I hate about her is that she changed her look so much. In 2007 she had a bollywood-like look to her with the smokey eye/nude lip thing going on. Now, she looks completely different. She downgraded her look.
i can’t imagine she would forget to put on her makeup either. but i do think she looks beautiful, much better than most people without makeup. it’s hard to have good skin as a celebrity i’m sure… especially after all those photoshoots where they cake on the makeup.
the ends of her hair look bad though, she’s much more unique looking as a brunette.
I don’t find her gorgeous or stunning… but don’t think she’s ugly neither. I’m not a fan of her body type also, but she looks ok overall…
She looks fine… great even considering.
she looks really beautiful with or without make-up I love her outfit of course her skin isn’t perfect because she wears a lot of makeup all the time and it’s not good cus the skin needs to breathe too so Kim remember to leave your make-up at home from time to time 1st cus u’ll still beautiful 2nd it’s better for ur skin .
Her eyebrows look strange, and she looks like she got her lips done.
umm i thought this was jessica biel at first glance. what a downgrade. kim, dye your hair back the way it was – you are much prettier than this
She has great skin! I look completely FUG without makeup.
i think she looks great. one of the best pictures of celebrities without make-up ive seen. and judging by these pictures, shes tiny! i think people dont believe shes size 2(okay maybe 4) because shes so curvy but guys shes also petite. shes probably smaller than a regular built skinny girl
I don’t find her face attractive with her heavy make up on but now I can say she’s got nice features. Some light foundation and lip gloss would make her look really good.
she almost looks like Diane Lane. Just a Little.
and her skintone is very uneven. She must put on a hell lot of make-up…
I like her better as a brunette.
This doesn’t even look like the beauty I’m so used to seeing!! I can’t believe she’s this plain without make up!! And that lighter shade of hair isn’t doing her any favours
DID SHE GT A SPRAY TAN OR SUMTHIN?
COZ SHE LOOKS KINDA BLOTCHY?
OH WELL..YES I REALISE CAPS ARE OBNOXIOUS SO SORRY
i think she still looks good tho i reckon she would look awesome without makeup and with her dark hair back!!! i always thought she was prettier with less/ without makeup on! also- look at that bod! she is so hot and curvy and toned! all those ppl callin her fat (usually i mean, not here) just compare her to the photos of that megan girl- pretty much the same kinda weight just the other chick is taller…
I think she looks good.
ow she’s beautiful as a blonde even without make-up
now I wanna go lighter lol
She really looks beautiful…alot of people dont look that good with no makeup on. I’m envious of that hourglass too! This isnt the first time she’s gone with no makeup, she’s done same on her show lots of times too.
Who cares if she’s trying to grab the spotlight? It isn’t a crime!?
I love her without makeup. she’s always wearing so much, it’s nice to see her natural for a change. She looks amazing.
I still think she looks fine without make-up. And actually like a human.
I don’t understand why it’s such a big deal.
It’s just scary how different she looks without it.
I would have never recognized her!
Well every one here is being rude , she is pretty i think the make up just enhances a women s face i think she is pretty with or with out make up bless her ……..
maybe she just wanted to blend in with the croud
beautiful
I don’t like Kim Kardashian (why does she speak like a twelve year-old?) but she looks great without makeup. She’s a natural beauty like Jessica Simpson.
Very rare attribute.
She looks worse than me without make-up. But then again, I don’t wear any except on my eyes and lips anyway so my skin’s pretty good. All that make-up has given her terrible skin!
come on people!!!! we are so easy to rag but half ..no more than half of us dont’ look better then her without makeup!
ok maybe some of us have better skin without. i know i do
but let me better clarify
all
of us
look
better with makeup
what the heck.
we seem to forget that celebrities ALWAYS HAVE MAKEUP. and top notch makeup to , not just basic eyeliner and lip gloss like many of us girsl have.
so please stop hating saying stuff.
or comparing ourselves to them face wise. body wise…well that just shape
for face u know there is factors like makeup. makeup is a wonderful thing. get too used to it then when u dont’ have it your like ..wow this is the real me.
so get over it.
i still don’t believe she’s a size 2
obviosly she was at the gym so it all probly seated off or she didnt wear any. shes human not everyone is going to look perfect without makeup. also she has blonde hair in this picture & blonde hair really doesnt make her complexion look that good