Kim Kardashian Is 109 Pounds Now
December 5, 2009 in Celebrity Weight & Measurements, Kim Kardashian by Versus
E! Online reports:
When Kim Kardashian recently posted this bikini shot of herself, we couldn’t help but notice how much weight she had lost. While our comments may have been construed as so very high school, it turns out that’s actually a good thing.
At least based on what the E! reality star told us exclusively.
Kim revealed to E! News that she began her recent diet at 120 pounds, but thanks to a dedicated workout and a diet regiment that includes Quick Trim supplements, she now only tips the scales at 109—a number she hasn’t seen since she was “in the ninth grade.”
If only our memories of school days gone by looked this good.
No comment.
I like this outfit.
you reallly don’t seem to like kim…idk why, she looks great. kinda annoying, but not anymore than psycho lindsay
NO F*****G WAY.
Ah kim… what ever floats your boat.
she’s so obsessed with her weight. make her shut up…talk about a good role model?? she is definitely not 109. she just looks more toned and maybe 8lbs less. what’s the big deal?
ugh. this girl is going to go out in the modern age equivalent to narcissus. how might one drown in her own reflection nowadays? maybe lighting bolts will emerge from her cellphone as she aims it at herself to post to twitter?
bahahaha yesss.
hehe thumbs up
i love this comment!
agree 100%!!
She is not 109 pounds. I love her to death but that is a blatant lie!
The women is tiny height wise, and now she’s pretty small weight wise- it’s not that hard to believe.
I am taller than her and less curvy and we weight the same – this doesn’t seem real to me.
Kim kept saying it was good to be curvy and except yourself and all, but to me she seems all obsessed with her weight and looking perfect and slim. I don’t know, but but she doesn’t seem to be practicing what she preaches and isn’t sending the right message out.
so what’s her next stunt, trying to fit into size 4 jeans? oh no wait, she’s already done that…
i really use to like this girl but this is getting annoying so very quickly.
not a 4.. a “2″
109 lbs, my ass.
someone needs to teach this girl how to read numbers.
oh wait…109 lbs..maybe she means one of her legs?
LMAO! My thoughts exactly.
You popl are assholes, she is 5 ft, she IS tiny get over yourselves
She’s 5’2″ or 3, not 5′. She’s not tiny, I saw a recent pic of her after the “weight loss”, and she looks NOTHING like this in it.
Maybe her ass is 109 lbs!! Lol
LMAO!
maybe her scale is off 6-8 pounds.
I’m willing to guess more like 16-18!! LOLZ
Is this picture photoshopped? Her face looks so distorted and her hips look much smaller (I know she’s lost weight, but it looks like her bones have shrunk too).
there was a huge discussion about the photoshop job on the last post about Kim
how tall is she?! i dont think she’s that tall and she doesn’t look that thin– 109 that is… she’s definitely thinner than before
ha 109 i think it’s funny people feel the need to be so precise, if i weighed 109 i would just say i weigh 110.
haha. next she’ll be 108.5 lbs and have to post another picture so we can see the difference
LMAO – so true!
people are such haters…the girl looks banging…bet all of u are fat asses…(coming from someone who is on QT, works out 4-5x/week, <1500 cal a day diet, 5'2..104lbs…) haaaaaaaaaaaaaaaters!!!
Nobody said she looks bad. People either said they’re tired of her talking about her body, or that they don’t think she looks 109 lb. I think she has a hot body, but there’s no way her body is 109 lb.
And you might want to reconsider your “fat a**es” comment. There are people that come on this site that are thinner than both you and Kim.
Hahahahahahaha, and i bet your face looks like shit, either way you wouldn’t need to try to get people to hate you with your weight
LMAO
ckmj, your comment is proof of why kim is a bad influence. your lifestyle sounds incredibly unhealthy, and yet you’re so proud of it. stop taking diet pills. eat more. you need to eat if you’re working out.
I can believe that, I’m 150cm and 46kg, which I think is equivalent to 5′ and 102lb. I have similar boobs but definitely don’t have that muscular physique hah my tummy is far too soft.. But yeah, I buy that Kim could be 109. But man, her head looks weird in that first picture.
If she’s short I guess I could buy it. I’ll agree that her face does look distorted. Weird. If this is a real photo she looks good. Slightly annoying that she would take a pic like this & post it though. THAT’s what’s so very highschool about this.
that photo is not real, i mean it;s photoshopped or smth, u take a picture and put a thin effect on it, and that is why her face looks distorted. I can’t believe they would actually say that is real..wtf? that is really twisted
I think she looks good. so what if she might be one or two pounds then 109 she still looks good and has lost a noticeable amount of weight. She is only like 5 feet tall so 109 is not going to look at slim at someone who is 5’7 and 109 pounds.
I totally agree! She is 5’2″! 109 lbs (or 110 or whatever!) will surely not look the same as a 5’9″ model.
I think people are unnecessarily hard on her. She has lost weight- it’s evident. I think part of the reason why she always addresses her weight loss is because the media ASKS or COMMENTS about it!
No one saying she’s lost weight: I can see she has (from other photos.. this one isn’t good enough due to the ridiculous angle). I just simple believe that she weighs more that 109. Her boobs and behind are way bigger than mine, but her abs and thighs resemble my own. I weigh about ten more pounds than she’s claiming she weighs and I’m only an inch taller than her.
BLATANT LIE. No F***ing way. No way. More like a good 20 lbs more. Nice Try, Kim. Why does she bother? Does she REALLY expect us all to believe that? LOL.
she’s only like 5’2 she cant weigh 20 pounds more and look like that. who cares if she lies? wouldn’t you drop two or three pounds if the national media asked you YOUR weight? probably. but oh wait, no one cares about you
I don’t want anyone to care about me, thank you. You see, I don’t derive pleasure from telling blatant lies to the public about my weight, like her. Why she does, I’ll never know.
That being said…even if she is 5’2″, she can weigh 20 lbs. more and look like what she REALLY does; that image is totally fake. And um, she didn’t drop 2-3 lbs. to the media, she “dropped” more than that in her little statement. I stand by my comment.
I’m seriously contemplating if this girl truly has psychological problems. Is she delusional? Pathological liar maybe?
This is a lie unless she is under five feet, which she is not.
Hey America, Don’t whine. Celebrities aren’t some kind of alien species that lands into your world. They are taken from your population. She’s not the first woman to lie about her weight. She’s not the first woman to take diet pills or be hypocritical about her body. I’m quite sure many other everyday women are doing that right now. Is she an air headed, vapid and otherwise boring person? Seems kinda like it but quite a few women in this country are the same way so I don’t think she needs to be singled out for those offenses. She’s not doing anything new.
I don’t think she is lying about her weight. I’m 5’5 and I didn’t look much different to that when I was 107 lbs. The only real difference was that I didn’t have much of a butt. Although people didn’t believe me about my weight either. People knew I’d lost weight and I’d ask them to guess and they would say ~120? Some people just look fatter than their weight suggests.
She’s not exactly a body builder, so I doubt she’s packing much muscle.
Totally believable if you ask me.
Well, I don’t know what you looked like, but I’m 5’5″ as well, and when I weighed 107 lbs. I was WAY skinnier than her, like Nicole Richie circa 2006 skinny, that’s why I find her claim hard to believe.
Agreed I’m also 5’5 and if i get even close to 110 I look extremly thin. Is Kim K deffinatly 5’5 ?
No, I think she’s about 5’3.
The point is that I was lighter and taller than her and I didn’t look much different from that.
kim has said that she weights 124 before she started dieting on Ok magazine and that she lost 15lbs. thats alot for someone that is 5 feet!
i believe she is 5’4 and 115lbs
I agree with you i think this is totally beleivable
Weight looks different on everyone. I’m 5’3″ and at my skinniest was 113 pounds which is, according to “standards”, only two pounds under what I “should” be but I was constantly asked if I was eating and if I was sick. My ribs were showing, my eyes appeared sunken in, and my cheeks were hollow. This only happened because I cut out meat from my diet and lost 8 pounds from that. Once I started working out with weights versus just doing cardio I packed on 13 pounds. I now weigh 126 pounds which at 5’3″ is considered overweight. However, I look exactly the same just more toned. My only reason for saying this is that just because one person is 5’5″ and 109 pounds and looks skinnier than Kim doesn’t mean that Kim can’t weigh that. First, the camera adds on 15 pounds so just because she looks bigger on TV doesn’t mean she is. Second, maybe she’s 109 pounds but has no muscle. In which case is completely believable. I don’t really care how much she weighs because it’s not about the number on the scale it’s about the way her clothes fit and her measurements. Maybe she lost 11 pounds but how many inches has she lost? Either way she looks great but is way too obsessed with her weight and she’s way to vein for my liking. She’s nearly 30 and talks more about her body and weight than any other celebrity. We get it, Kim, you lost weight. Good for you. Now shut up about it.
i totally agree with you, i weigh more than some of my friends but i look like im smaller than them. weight looks different on everybody, that’s why i don’t have scales. anyone who workouts out alot and builds muscle will find scales confusing because u will have friends and family saying you look too skinny but then the scales will say your overweight
in what universe is 5’3 126 pounds considered overweight? I have never seen a weight chart that agrees with this statement….these kind of comments must be really hurtful to people who really do have a weight problem!
I agree, in no way, shape or form is 126 for 5’3” overweight. Most people would consider that to be normal/slightly small! Of course, it depends on your bone structure/muscle tone but that is usually a completely healthy weight.
ok i can only defend kim sooo much!! seriously 109???? what scale is she using?? she may be short, but come one she must weight at least 10lbs more than that!!!!
This picture angle makes her look extremely top heavy like huge boobs with stick legs she could weigh 109 pound though she is short
She must have some kind of psychological disorder to obsess about her weight as much as she does. Is it seriously all she talks about? She probably has taken a few pounds off her actual weight but who really cares about a spoilt superficial fame hunter.
The above photo was photoshoped… LOL
I understand that she’s petite, but there’s no way she’s 109. Boobs and booty = extra weight.
I believe she lost as much weight as she says she did, but I don’t believe she started off at 120. I think she was 130/135 and is now 120. Which is a healthy weight; I don’t understand why she needs to claim otherwise.
If some of you are going to disagree with me and start lecturing me about how people can “carry weight differently”, all I have to tell you is that I’ll only believe it when I see Kim step on an untampered scale and prove she’s 109.
Casey I completely agree with you. I always thought She was at least 130-135 when she “started”. Right now she is probably around 117, which she already (falsely) claimed a while back.
Source: I am 5’3″, 110 pounds and my body looks like Cheryl Cole’s – thin and toned. I look way smaller than Kim and her claim to weigh 109.
She screwed herself over from the get go by lying and saying she was 117, so I guess she would rather falsely claim random numbers than admit the truth. Like it really matters though, it’s just a freaking number!
I agree with you Alias. Because she lied then, she has to keep lying.
Remember the photos of her in a red bikini with her sister in a pool. There’s no way that woman was 120.
But she said she was 120 anyway, and now that she is actually 120, she has to go even lower for her weight loss to make sense. You can’t say “I was 120, lost 10-15 pounds and now I’m 120!”
Haha exactly! Oh and I know – those red bikini photos!! Or how about this one:
http://theradreport.com/files/images/kim_kardashian_bikini_picture_0.jpg
There is no way on earth she is even close to 120 there. That is 130-135 minimum, maybe even 140!
‘You can’t say “I was 120, lost 10-15 pounds and now I’m 120!” ‘
EXACTLY!
I agree with all of the above statements. Mine and Kim’s measurements were almost exactly the same when she first started defending her weight and we’re only an inch difference in height! And guess what–I was about 130 at the time!!! It’s just crazy to think that she weighed 10-15 lbs. less than me and we’re built almost exactly alike. Granted, I’ve lost a little weight, too, but I think I look similar to the pic above (without photoshop, of course) and I’m not frightened to say I’m at about 120. So, of course, I think she’s full of it. Either I have a whole lot more muscle that weighs more than her fat, or she’s lying…
She’s so pathetic.
But I believe she weighs only 109 because she is really short. And she is really slim now, only boobs and ass left. However, this pic is soooo photoshoped.
No Fing way she can be 109 pounds!!!!! Her boobs probably weigh 10 or 20 pounds combined! It’s just really sad that Kim Kardashian, one of the women with the biggest butts in the world is selling weight-loss products.
She doesn’t contribute anything to society except for a sex tape, (which is one of the only reasons why she is famous). She is a disgrace to women and young girls should not look up to her because she is one of the many reasons for the overall exploitation, and disrespect of women today.
the maximum that breasts can way is 4 pounds..
that is for breasts of her size obviously and per breast. so maximum they contribute 8 lbs.
Nope, different sizes have different weights. We don’t know what size she is so it’s not fair to say that.
According to who?
is it me or the picture really looks stretched verticaly?
It’s not you. It IS stretched vertically. As are plenty pictures of her body she posts on her site.
The picture HAS been stretched/elongated to make her look slimmer.
…I’m sorry, but what is Kim famous for again? Having a sex tape and a big butt?
And 109lbs? Not only does that number sound exaggerated (she has lost some, but she is definitely not 109lbs), but it’s really effing sad how much she keeps talking about her body. Every time I read about Kim in the news, it’s about her “curves”, “booty” or “new diet” or “how proud she is of her curves”, yadda yadda. It gets REALLY old Kim.
There is no way she has a BMI of 19.3, which is what 109 lbs at 5’3″ equals out to. A BMI of 21 seems more accurate.
Hey people. She’s a very good businesswoman! Just look what she did: she was curvy, with cellulite, let the paparazzi take photos of her fat ass… Now, when she started “using” (and selling) this quick trim, she talks how great she feels using it, and how pretty and slim she looks now!
hahaha… Yes, she is a good businesswoman. She knows what she does 
Ok, Kim, we get it. You’ve got a decent figure and a nice skin tone and – telling from the ambitious aymounts of photographs you post of yourself – you’re quite pleased with your body yourself. Good for you. Can we please move on now?
I definetely believe she´s 109 pounds. If she´s short, 157 cm, weight over 49 kg isn´t that little, that´s totally normal. That makes her BMI 20.1. When you are little, you can weight little without looking too skinny.
i don’t think she’s 109 pounds she looks 109pound muscle weights more than fat so id say she more like 120 pounds but in this picture she is photoshopped to the max so i don’t think we can go off this picture the last picture i saw of her she looks the same but im sick of her talking about her weight and size kim has serious body issues
Oh purleeeeaaaase …. She SHOULD be 109 llbs (if she really wants to be) as it’d seem that she’s one of those lucky (???) people who can just spend their whole time thinking and working on their appearance. I’m sure we all know a hundred girls who lead normal lives and look just as good without even really trying, and without boring the rest of the world into (almost) gob-smacked silence into the bargain … and that photo is SOOO photoshopped – she’s lost her ‘famous’ hips, her waist is almost the same width measurement as only one of her boobs, and her jawline is about to descend into her cleavage
Ouch I sound really bitchy now. Yeah, she looks kinda good in this photo but she should, after all that apparent hard work and effort.
o versus, why do you give this girl the attention that she so craves.
You’re right, why do I?
I get many requests to post about her from various visitors – and her posts are always full of comments.
I want to point out one thing: In the add, the blonde woman has EXACTLY the same body as Kim in the picture. While Kim looks bigger and a bit different in the add. Case closed.
I agree completely.
But the blonde woman IS Kim.
so why does she have 2 different bodies in the same add? photoshop disaster much? =))
Well let’s do the math here. At 5’0 and 109 pounds, Kim’s BMI would be 21.3. Looking at that picture, I find it quite plausible that her BMI is 21.3, no?
She’s 5’2.5″
BMI: 19.6
That’s not plausible. Maybe in the above, edited, picture, but not in unedited pictures of her.
Kim is 5’3″.
It is good that she feels better about her body, but if this is her biggest accomplishment in her life, then I feel bad for her.
i do not think this picture is elongated if you look at the previous entry and posting of kim and khloe from a few days ago they are both in that picture and kim looks the exact same and khloe looks good too, but they both look very realistic. kims face is really done up but she has said before that her makeup artist does certain shading to make her nose look smaller. I would look at those other pics too if you have looked at this one, its kinda interesting.
Look at how much higher her forehead looks. Her nose looks an inch longer and thinner to me and her jawline is SOOOOOOOO much more V shaped than before. The proportions are way off, in my opinion. I don’t know if you see it, but they’re very obvious to me…
I weigh the same and am a cm taller, and am size 00 in jeans with very prominent bones and have to constantly defend my thinness. So I really do not believe that she is 109 pounds.
What’s her height? She looks big every time I see her on any picture. I don’t watch her show so I don’t really know. My best friend happened to see her in person and she said that she’s really tiny. Take note though that my best friend is 6’2″
I can see that she is 109. People may vary in weight. Just because they look big doesn’t mean they are heavy in the scale. I know really tiny people that weighs a lot.
But she always talk about her weight and celebrities lies about their body stats anyway. So even though I give her the benefit of the doubt that she is 109 pounds, there’s this part of me that doesn’t really believe that it is true.
i can totally believe that she is 109. 109 is not that little. i weighted 107 when i was taller than her. she IS small AND curvy (boobs+ ass) everyone really doesnt want this to be true. stop hating. worry about your own weight
I weight 110 at 5’4, and I have very little curves. NO butt, small boobs.
She, who has LOTS of butt and lots of boob, does NOT wight 109. Such a lie.
I weigh 102 at 5’4″ and have boobs and a butt (not like kim but i have them); they come from body shape not from fat. Really.
Damn Uma you sound hot! Victoria’s Secret body much? Same with Michele, you sound hot too!!
Uma, your body sounds like a miracle to me. Lucky!
But, I definitely don’t think it’s the norm, and I don’t think that Kim’s body is the way yours is. Not considering what she claimed she weighed before, how much she looks to have lost, her extreme assets, and so on.
But, I could be wrong of course, but I just don’t see it. I think it has to do with my size and weight and having never seen a girl with a body like Kim that weighed so little. Since you have – yourself – I understand why you believe it.
She’s not very muscular, so it’s possible she weighs 109, IMO. I have a friend who is the same height as me and weighs about 10 lbs less, but I only look a little bit heavier than her because I have a lower fat/muscle ratio. Someone like Kim with not a lot of muscle could easily weigh less than they actually look.
just cus kim has silicone ass and tits doesnt meant she can not be 109 she has NO muscle tone whatso ever and the is a small build and small in height so yes it can happen
I think she got a natural Fat Ass!
why the HELL do any of you guys care?
I was thinking the exact same thing my friend. I’m on here for the beauty not the beasts- get over it.
Pathetic, isn’t it?
well, at first i did care and was angry about her liar ass, excuse, liar self, but now i enjoy these posts and lmao, literally, each time. at her naivity and at people fighting over her, and at people believing everything she says. it’s great brainless fun!!
I feel the same, Uma.
She wishes she were 109. I really don’t think so.
I liked her body before the weight loss… IDK, she used to have the most beautiful waist and it looks weird now. The weight, well, people carry it differently. My friend is about her weight and weighs 150, but, she looks thinner than Kim.
shes a tall girl and is still curvy, shes not 109lbs, Im 108lbs and Im shorter and look smaller than her, and shes more muscular than me, muscle weighs more than fat.. so? LIAR.
this photo is sooooooo photoshopped..her face is different from her body color..her hips are not that small..nor is her waist..and her stomach…bla…look at her lower left leg..its blur.. ;D
As soon as she stops taking the supplements she’s going to back on the pounds.
I find that so VERY hard to believe. For one, my 5’0″ friend weighs in at 100 pounds and is absolutely tiny. Two, I might be able to believe it (I mean, everyone’s body is different) except for the fact that picture shows her to have a very muscular stomach. Assuming the rest of her body isn’t just skin and has at least some muscle, there’s NO WAY
I find that so VERY hard to believe. For one, my 5’0″ friend weighs in at 100 pounds and is absolutely tiny. Two, I might be able to believe it (I mean, everyone’s body is different) except for the fact that picture shows her to have a very muscular stomach. Assuming the rest of her body isn’t just skin and has at least some muscle, there’s NO WAY she’s 109. I’m the same height as her, same size (but just a little less stretched by photoshop) and weigh 140.
But I think we really need to see a candid, unphotoshopped picture before we can really say anything.
I agree.
she’s looking good!
BUT I DONT KNOW IF AYONE ELS THINKS IT TOO….BUT HER FACE
WHY DOES HER FACE LOOK LIKE THAT
IT DONT LOOK REAL
IT LOOKS CLOSE TO LIKE ANIMATION OR SOMETHING
but she looks really nice!
she’s looking good!
BUT I DONT KNOW IF AYONE ELS THINKS IT TOO….BUT HER FACE
WHY DOES HER FACE LOOK LIKE THAT
IT DONT LOOK REAL
IT LOOKS CLOSE TO LIKE ANIMATION OR SOMETHING
but she looks really nice!
I’m gonna have to call bullshit on that one. Absolutely no way she is 109 pounds. I’m not saying she doesn’t have a good body (if that is, in fact, her body), I’m just saying that it is absolutely not 109 pounds. I’d say about 130. She looks really muscular. That would be my guess.
I dont mean to be rude but I don’t think she is 109lbs. I’d say about 125lbs sounds about right for her. I’m 5’5″ and 110lbs and I’m really, really thin. Most people estimate I’m about 90lbs! LOL. But seriously, Even tho she is 3 inches shorter I’m pretty sure her big fake boobs and her giant butt makes up more than 10lbs extra… Also that picture has been edited very badly. I can see where all the edits have been made.
amen sister. that’s my build as well, & i agree that the boobs/butt are definitely going to add a bit more.
119 or 129 more like!!! Whatever LIAR. She doesn’t even look like a person. What’s wrong with her face, it’s so powdery and white!?
Photoshop disaster!!
Um….this is laughable AT BEST.
I’m not tooting my own horn [just my family genetics], but i’m 5’2, & just by sheer luck i’ve always weighed under 11o, even with sports.
I’m half her size.
There is NO way she weighs anything NEAR 1o9. I weighed 1o9 a few months ago before i lost some weight, & seriously….not even close.
I’m just small, with not nearly as much in the rear, or up front, so i am really, really doubting with everything I have that she is 1o9. That is a lie.
She looks good, that’s a given, but no one is going to believe that.
Also, the extreme tan, yea, it’s going to make anyone look slimmer.
but not 1o9 pounds. Please. She needs to just relax a bit with the face powder, & try looking more natural. she looks like an alien, facially, with the amount of facial make up. why does no one trust their natural beauty anymore? I understand enhancing it, but she pretty much has a new face painted on! :\
Hey I lost 2stone in a month! Maybe I should make a porno with a celeb n sell my story too!
x
Urgh
remember what she is famus for,, ?
N when u put ur legs in that pose corse ull luk thinner
and FYI , there’s no way in hell she’s 109lbs.
Her head looks photoshopped on.
I don’t think it’s real.
I mean look at it, her body it like four shades lighter than her head!
*barf* her curves got her to where she is… shes was a nobody with out them now YOU DONT HAVE THEM????? Ugh…. #HOEHAVEASEAT I dont like it… it making her head look bigger sorrrryyy
her head looks big
I’d easily believe she weighs 110 pounds. She is only 5’2 and her arms and waist both look tiny – I think the big boobs & waist/hips ratio make her appear a lot larger in a photo than she would in real life.
LMFAO, you people seriously can’t tell that that is photoshopped? that’s not even her body. look at “her” left leg for one thing, and see how it’s blurred around it.
I agree, really photoshoped.
WOWWW YOU GUYS DONT KNOW ANYTHING YOUR TALKING ABOUT
first of all she isnt a tall girl dumbass she is 5 feet tall thats it
there is NOO SILICONE she is armenian we all have BIG ASSES and another thing , KIM HAS BEEN A D CUP SINCE SHE WAS TWELVE she posted a pic of her when she was twelve with barely ear length hair she hated her body and boobs and prayed for them to go away she is a super small framed girl k ? she hasnt gotten that stuff done other then cellulite treatments
i think kim is a beautiful girl..her body is hot! but i am 5’2 and i just can’t believe she weighs 109..even with a tight body like that. i just dont believe its possible with her butt and boobs. i am not claiming to be perfect at all. in fact, my weight fluctuates and my tummy is not as toned as kim’s at all. right now i weigh about 116. but when i weigh less than 110 im very very thin. my boobs go from a C to an A/B and jean size from a 2/3 to a 0/1…like i said, she is beautiful and her body looks fantastic but i just think shes fibbing on her weight..hasnt anyone seen the episode of keeping up with the kardashians that is all about kim’s fibbing habit? (;
She looks great your just jealous. I love Kim Kardashin stop hating
She’s really beautiful. You girls complain when people judge our body but YOU girls judge !
I don’t believe at all than she’s 109 lbs, it’s physically impossible but she’s not fat either ! Come on, bags of bones are ugly and unhealthy.
Why would she want to be 109 lbs like come on.