Kim Kardashian: “How I Lost 15 Lbs. — And Kept It Off!”
January 10, 2010 in Celebrity Weight & Measurements, Kim Kardashian by Versus
This is unexpected (From OK! Magazine:
Fans following Kim Kardashian on Twitter recently got an eyeful: The 27-year-old Keeping Up With the Kardashians star posted new bikini pics that left little to the imagination — proof that her weight-loss struggles are over. “I am toned, fit and at a healthy weight,” Kim Tweeted. “I just need to keep it up!”
After pre-retouched photos from a magazine shoot revealed cellulite on her thighs, Kim was inspired to get serious about her health. So how did she do it? In the new issue of OK! — on sale everywhere Thursday! — we’ve got the exclusive on how Kim shed the pounds and went from a 124 pounds to 109 and from a size 6 to a size 2!
Question: Are you guys interested to find out Kim’s meal plans & co.?
See another bikini picture inside!
she does look good, but she’s soo annoying with the weight loss stuff. we get it!
I thought she said she was already a size 2 before!?
Or is she a size 2 american, which is 6 uk, and is now 2 uk (ok mag is UK) and therefor a 00 american>???
fut the what?
she thinks we’re fools!
where is this “size 6″ coming from?
and that is so misleading for her to use uk sizes then convert back to american sizes when it’s convient for her.
she didn
t need to lose weight, she always looks fine.
good on her, but I thought she always was a 2…
I just wanted to say ,
1) I still don’t believe she is 109 or a size 2. I think she is only saying that because she lied before she lost the weight, and the weight loss has to make sense. You can’t say, “I was 120, and now I’m 120!”
2) Whatever you may think about her, she does deserve to be proud of her body because it looks great and she worked hard for it.
3) I’m sure at least 15 people will say this, but no, she is not famous for “nothing.” People don’t become famous for nothing, nor do they get to choose whether or not they’ll be faomous. She is famous because we made her famous. So instead of blaming her, we as society should look at ourselves and reconsider what we find important if we make people like her famous and millionaires.
i agree with 2 and 3, but i do believe she weighs 109 pounds. it’s rude for anybody to say that another person is lying about their weight. granted, most people do lie about it, but if you’re voluntarily telling people your weight, it’s probably truthful. kim is very small. i have seen her in person and she is tiny! she is also very short, and short people always look like they weigh more than they do
Id bet anything ׳jen’ is actually kim karadashian
Casey I once again agree with you. 109 is just a huge lie! But hey, she knows how much she really weighs, and unless she takes a picture of the scale with her on it (which I wouldn’t be surprised if she did lol) then everyone knows the truth.
@jen, it doesn’t matter that “she’s short”
I AM SHORT 5’3″, I way 108 and I DON’T have an ass that big nor HUGE boobs! The only reason people believe her is because they are die-hard fans, that is it. They don’t want to admit that it’s a lie, and the “she’s short” excuse is a cop out.
Honestly no matter how much Kim “tones up” her stomach always looks mushy!
weigh*
i’m not a “die hard fan” but i’m not judgemental either. like you said, she knows how much she really weighs. good for you that you’re 5’3″ and 108lbs, but not all bodies are created equal. like i said, i’ve seen her in person, and she is very thin. feel free believe what you will
Jen are you Kim kardasian? LOL
Yes and you dont have those giant implant boobs which are probably heavy as hell and I’m sure you dont have a cheese butt!
actually i do have large implants and they aren’t heavy. it’s ridiculous that people think boobs and butt add so much extra weight
The average silicone implant weighs about 2.5lbs each for a D implant. So a combined weight of 6lbs at least + the weight and fat which was already present in the breast! I would say around 8 lbs for the entire set together.
Mind you, I know some implants are light as they are smaller sizes (smaller meaning B – C cup would be around 1.5-2lbs). Kim kardashians implants however are very large and they look droopy in her bathing suit, meaning they probably weigh a great deal. The natural breast also has a lot of fat around it anyways… plus all the baby junk. lol
Actually I just read her boobs are even bigger than I thought… “Kim Kardashian’s breast size is 32-DD”. Meaning they probably weight even more than I expected!
http://ezinearticles.com/?How-Much-Do-Breast-Implants-Weigh?&id=1922233
You better sit down for this one:
http://www.ehow.com/facts_5448639_much-do-breast-implants-add.html
The size she describes is a small implant size (which only takes you 1 size up from what you originally were) weighing a combined weight of 2lbs (not including the ORIGINAL FAT AND TISSUE ALREADY ON THE WOMAN).
Many of the women who choose large breast implants have already successfully undergone a breast augmentation of 500 cc or less, and then decide that they would like to increase their breast size further. Whether this will be your first breast augmentation, and you know you want to start with large breast implants, or if you currently have implants and want to consider big breast implants, Dr. Pousti can advise you about various implants sizes from 625 cc to 1000 cc and every size in between.
From: http://www.poustiplasticsurgery.com/Procedures/Procedure_breastImplantXL.htm
http://www.lwgatz.com/480ccbreastimplants-s/1204.htm
This site shows you how a normal small 480 implant can take you up a single size.
If kim is a large 32 DD size, she most likely chose a larger size since she was a B size before the procedure. In order to get those massive things she would have to choose at least a 500cc!!!! Which is almost 3lbs extra in total for just the implants, plus her original fat and tissue of the B size which is at least 3-4lbs for the normal woman. So that is a TOTAL WEIGHT of implants + original tissue = 7-8lbs….
Don’t post links until you have the facts. You have to know how much cc weighs and Kims implants are MASSIVE so you can’t assume she has had the smallest ones implanted.
yep i completely agree with you on 2 and 3…i think she may weigh 109 tho…especially with her curvy shape…people often look like they weigh more and are bigger in size when they have bigger hips etc.
I didn’t make her famous!! and i don’t care if she is, but it doesn’t mean i have to like or care about her. and yes i am reading this story, but i read basically any story about weight loss regardless if it is about her or joan from down the street!
she looks amazing.
just how photo shopped are the pics??
interestingly as well she seems to lose weight ( unless it owes more to photoshop than real life) more on her lower half. her boobs don’t seem that different.
she has implants??? i know nothing about this girl.
i have natural 30 dd/e breasts. it completely bewilders me why anyone would want implants. they are such a pain!!
I think she’s absolutely gorgeous, head to toe. Beautiful face and a great body. Which she worked hard for.
Same Old, Same Old.
People will drop into this post and call Kim K. fat, worthless, a slutbag, stupid, etc. etc. etc.
Some neurotic women will proclaim how much skinnier they are and so therefore they are better human beings.
I’m going to run out of things to put in a list.
We get it Kim. You are hot. You flambe for pete’s sake. Put your ass away so maybe we can miss it one day.
LMAO this is one of the best comments i’ve read all week
ha ha! agreed! including the bit about the posters and their own weight
BAHAHAHAHHAAAA
Couldn’t have put it better. Bravo!
Does anyone else think her face looks weird in these pictures?
it is probably wrongly photoshopped.Like the rest of her.
I won’t believe she lost so much weight until i see real paparazzi pictures.
Even in these photos she doesnt look 109lbs.
I agree!
Just look at her skinny arms! In paparazzi pictures, her arms are bigger. Not fat, just not photoshoped XD
Her face is a bit weird looking for my taste – in general, but yes it has been photoshopped poorly – along with her body which they tried really hard at photoshopping. I can still tell they made that space between her arms. Its suprisingly easy to photoshop actually, my boyfriend works in the computer feild and it really is easy to make things appear smaller than they are!!!
How can you guys tell she’s photoshopped? I assumed she was photoshopped because no celeb isn’t. But what are the telltale signs in general?
Her skin looks plastic!Her hair isnt glowing towards the ends…etc
You can tell because of the way the light is around her tummy… its too light. Normally, even if a lot of light is shone on you, it would still be darker on the sides (just the way you shade when you draw). Her sides look drawn, like they are really sharp ending lines (the first pic it looks like part of her front leg is missing because it just ends and there is no change in shape or color). Also, there is often a liquified look to the pics. You can tell her bathing suit got the worst of the liquified application. Normally it would be sharper looking…
Thanks! I tried looking for the things you guys pointed out but I’m still having a hard time seeing the signs. I guess I need a better trained eye.
“After pre-retouched photos from a magazine shoot revealed cellulite on her thighs, Kim was inspired to get serious about her health.”
didn’t know that having cellulite is unhealthy *sarcasm off*
How does she get those boobs into a size 2 dress is all want to know.
Exactly! Size 2 dresses just plain don’t accommodate anything over a B cup. Hers are DEFINITELY too big for a size 2.
THANKYOU!
lmao apparently she hasn’t always been a size “2″… Kim you have been caught in a white lie, good job.
um the whole controversy about her weight and her size remeber when she tried on her jeans…..well she was a size 2 then not a 6 so how can she NOW say she is a size 2???
the whole reason she forced her fat ass into those jeans was to prove that you can be curvy and still a size 2
i smell some bullshhii……..
lol!
she looks great but i don’t believe she’s a size 2!
109 pounds is that 49.55kg? her body is amazing but i definitely think she weighs alot more, i no she’s short but she does have a very large bust and bottom so it seems silly to claim 109 pounds.
This chick is lying and seeking all the attention she can get..obviously! I don’t believe she is a size 2. Jessica Szohr is a size 2 and she looks like a size 2. Kim looks like a size 4/6.
OMg yes jessica Szohr is sooooo tiny in comparison! Kim would eat Jessica for a mid-day snack. lol. Joking of course! <3
lol…you are hillarious, i love it. i dont care if kim looses five or fifteen pounds, her body is still nothing to brag about.
yeah but jessica szor is 5’5/5’6 and kim is 5’1/5’2.. a size 2 looks totally different on those heights
she may well be a size 2, a size 2 is basically 36″ hips (sometimes 35″) and hers could be that size, she is really short.
anyway for all we know jessica could be a size 0 but saying she is a 2 because of backlash she might get for being a size 0 and in a teen-targeted tv show
Just because someone is 3 inches taller wouldn’t mean their hips would be bigger exactly. 3 inches really isn’t that much. I’m Jessica’s height and my hips are a 33inch. Most models (really tall at like 5’10) have child-like hips. I dont think that kim has a small bone stucture cause she has really large wrists and this is how doctors measure bone size.
Here’s her wrists:
http://showstalker.net/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/kim-carmen-disaster-move.jpg
“I am a size 27 jeans… My measurements are 34, 26, 39. But remember I am 5′2″ and 1/2 and everyone carries their weight in different places.”
… she wrote this on her blog, at the same time when she was claiming to be a size 2.
I just dont understand how a 39 hip could fit in size 2 jeans. Mine just fits comfortably in a size 1 and I don’t pretend to be a size 00… I’m not going to run around saying I’m 90lbs when I’m obviously not – because I’d only be fooling myself. I guess if you found the right material you could wedge yourself into a super stretched out size 2… but it probably wouldn’t be a true size 2.
I think she could be a size 2 in particular brands because of how generous some sizes are….all I’m getting at is that a size 2 is not as small as it seems.
If anyone wanted to read her comments as untruthful, you could always defend your opinion with the fact that size inflation is out of control and thus she could be telling truth but is still not as small as a “size 2″ implies.
I couldn’t agree more with krystal. A size 2? really? Isn’t Victoria Beckham -one of the skinniest woman in Hollywood- a size 0? So…is just a matter of ONE SIZE that big difference from having no butt to her good but big ass? And the curves? It’s just a matter of a size? I don’t think she’s 109 lbs but it’s unbelievable she’s a 2. Pics from some days ago are coming to my mind, she’s just walking errands in LA wearing no make-up and of course the pics are not retouched and in those pics…wow…they’re far away from being the pics of a size 2 girl (no matter how `small´she is)
i know a girl who is proportionately the same size as VB except she is 6′ tall (not 5’4) and she wears a 0. i dont believe VB’s waist is only 23″ also, it is smaller. she probably gets her clothes custom made. VB would probably make a 5’4 size 0 look fat.
There is an older post of Kim in the second bikini, behind the scenes, that was claimed to be a “before” pic. Now its being used as an “after” pic. I just think she is so shady and fake when it comes to her body and weight loss. You can see what I’m talking about under the weight loss tag.
I didn’t bother reading the post, because I’m really sick of her. Hasn’t she lost and kept off the weight for like 6 months now? For healthy people it really isn’t much of a science what to do to achieve that.
She’s looks like an hourglass here.
why do her “abs” look sprayed on with self tanner or bronzer in the cover photo? that kind of shadow would not occur in natural sunlight
Good lord I laughed out loud when I saw what you pointed out. How ridiculous. It look like a damn Templar cross. Her stomach is fine why in the hell did they do that?
that was what i was thinking but i didnt know how to express it!!!
they might be a photoship job,because they are placed wrongly.
Hey W****dashian,why dont you lose yourself? That would be amazing!
I don’t believe she is a size 2 or weighs 109. I really don’t…
she’ll do anything to get on a cover magazine and I’m getting sick and tired of her fame whore ways. Nevertheless I agree with Casey there is no way in hell that she’s a size two and 109 pounds. Call me rude IDC. And this cover proves once again how she’s all beauty no brains whatsoever. Unless you count brains as what she was giving Ray-J in her now infamous video. She’s still incredibly stupid and a cake face with the makeup.
I agree, I could probably make my face up 65 times with all the makeup she has one… you can’t even see her real skin. In real life its really scary to see someone like that. I met a girl at shoppers drugmart and she had a similar makeup thing going on… my boyfriend asked me what was wrong with her face. lol.
hahahahaha classic guy response! Surprisingly so guys prefer a more toned down natural makeup look even though they really like smokey eyes.
Honestly, who cares how much she weighs or if she’s lying about her weight. Bottom line is she looks beautiful and in great shape.
I dont care if Kim is a size 2 or 22! what we should look at is the process of seeing her firm and turn her body right before our very eyes. I know some ppl complain about her always talking about her weight but she’s not the only one. Models talk about weight, celebrities talk about weight we the commentaters on a blog constantly talk aout this issue! IMO we should look at this women who is always in the public eye losing weight the healthy way, eating healthy and working out ppl should look at that and want to strive for the same thing if not better Kim looks great end of.
I agree with you to a certain extent but they definitely don’t talk about their looks/body/ “I’m supposedly a size 2 please believe me” like Kim does. It just comes off incredibly narcissistic,annoying and further perpetuates the notion that she’s all beauty and NO BRAINS. I use to love her when the first season of KUWTK came out on E! because she was curvy and used to talk about other stuff in her interviews like fashion, dash, future business ventures etc.Now I can’t help but think she totally gave into the typical Hollywood starlet stereotype. BTW what does IMO mean lol.
just fyi QuikTrim is not a “healthy” way to lose weight.
I saw her at Barneys last Saturday with her stylist. And let me tell you, she doesn’t have a “big butt” like the media makes it seem. I’ve actually seen her a lot in L.A. Her face is really long in person I suppose it’s because of her weight-loss. Anyways, the point is that she doesn’t look like that in person. She was wearing the typical leggings with a tunic. In all honestly, her body isn’t as curvy as it looks like in photos. It’s a shame that she aims to be a role model but isn’t honest about her own body and image.
it often happens with curvier people- they look bigger in photos than in real life. i could imagine her being teeny tiny- smaller than models measurements in the waist etc
Jesus Kim is pathetic. goooo awwaaaayyyyyyyyyy
oh. and i thought she already was a “2″ chick is OVERLY obsessed with her appearance.. she comes off as incredibly narcissistic… I unfortunately caught a fragment of her on Jay Leno.. was hard to take.. honestly, dumb as a box of rocks. and for the love of god WHY does she copy that annoying baby talk that Paris Hilton does. sounds JUST like her, then copies her in the “sexy” Carls Jr. ads… this is why I think she’s so f-ing pathetic
Why did they photoshop a green circle into the second picture is what I want to know. Is it meant to be a beach ball or something?
lol! i just noticed that! weird…
The circle is from the article and has writing that probably can’t be reproduced on the site….I bought this mag….what annoys me is its says “easy at home workout” …..Its 2 moves….and doing 2 moves isn’t a “workout” ….Its 2 moves!
lol
Does she pay you to put her on here every day?????? Just like AOL and People.com??? She’s always on these sites and I’m just sick of it. I can’t stand this no talent w**** clown or her sisters!
Can someone please explain to me how an ass that size would fit in a size 2 pair of jeans? I’m a size 1 and I have NO butt. Her butt would send mine running to hide. I’m sorry, I just dont understand how that much butt would fit inside a size 2 unless it was specially made for her.
On a side note these pictures have been edited to a GREAT degree. LOOK AT HER BUTT IN THESE WORKOUT OUTFIT PICS:
http://www.skinnyvscurvy.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/07/kim-kardashian-do-these-pants-make-my-butt-look-big-part-4.jpg
Unless these are magical spandex pants… it aint gonna happen…
To be fair I think that photo is kinda old, before she took her fitness frenzy to such extremes. And I’m Australian, so don’t really know what our equivalent to a size 2 is (I’m guessing a 6 or 8), but her arse really doesn’t look that big to me in those photos.
Yeah not in these photos show here.
However, here it is in an unphotoshopped pic.
http://media.photobucket.com/image/kims%20ass/SpeedyGonzalez2012_uk/kim-kardashians-ass.jpg
get a job!
W/E. If you don’t like the site then LEAVE!
I write on this site for fun when I’m bored.
Yeah we all write when we are bored but the only time I ever see your comments is on Kim Kardashian posts! You spend so much time searching for proof that Kim is ugly or fat or whatever you want to call her and you continue to post all these mean comments about her. If you don’t like her so much why do you even take the time? It’s weird..
Oh dont get me wrong! I LOVE KIM!!!! But not for positive reasons! LOL.
Oh my god. I have never seen a more disproportionatley HUGE ass in my life! Poor girl. Must suck for her to try to fit into chairs. With an ass as big as a truck, one wonders how she affords to be so vain?
I dunno. Apparently she wanted it that way, so those are implants according to some, but other claim its actually real. I would believe she was 109lbs without that butt and those huge boobs. It would be more realistic.
here’s a great bloated looking one of her… lol
http://www.celebritybeautybuzz.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/06/kimkardashian-butt.jpg
Her face looks a lot different in that pic.
Yeah that one is prob closer that what she looks like in real life, without photoshop.
Actually I think that pic is just from years ago when she used to dress and do her makeup completely differently. She also has lost weight since then. I don’t think it has anything to do with being unphotoshopped but she looks beautiful in that picture that you posted as well and she looks beautiful now. She is kind of annoying and I am getting tired of her like most of you but I still think she is a very beautiful girl.
She is a pear shape. Her boobs have to be fake or something. I have her body type exactly, and I lose 5 pounds and bye bye breasts.
She looses 15 pounds they look the same.
I DONT BUY IT.
I do believe her boobs and butt are fake but she won’t admit it. I’ve seen her before the weight loss and her boobs were the same size. A bra doesn’t do wonders all the time. I think she’s just in denial and if she admits it, she’ll be your typical wanna-be Hollywood girl.
This female reporter doesn’t believe it either… She says “Fans want to kick her UMMMMMMMM size 2 behind???!?!?”
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZSqZO_RP72s
SHE IS NOT A SIZE 2…
To me, she was always a size 6 at her skinniest but most of the time a size 8… I do not understand why she keeps on saying shes so proud of her body when she just lies about her weight…
She is skinnier now but i can bet shes a size 6 and MAYBEEEE JUST MAYBE she fits into some size 4 clothing
we all know your secrret already kim kardashian. adobe photoshop.
Please stop these Kardashian posts. I can’t take much more of this crap. So she lost 15 pounds? Does she want a Nobel prize or something? Sorry but it is not hard to lose 15 damn pounds so she should really stop bragging about her pathetic “achievement”.
I agree 100%. It’s repetitive and tasteless
If you don’t like the Kardashian posts, you can skip them. I can not simultaneously please everyone: you and the people who ask me to stop posting her, Google Analytics (which says that I get LOADS of visitors that search “Kim Kardashian weight / diet / size/ bla bla”, Google Trends and the visitors that send tips about her and ask for new posts.
115 posts should tell you different padme .
She is he most popular person on this site. She has her own army of haters who post the same thing that you post on every thread that she is in. If she wasn’t popular then she wouldn’t be on the site. I have an idea if you see her on the site you can skip past her and post about someone.
It is real easy, I do it with Victoria Beckham.
LOL. lost weight? She’s still so……wide >.<
It’s very suspicious how she lost weight everywhere yet her breasts did not lose any fat whatsoever…..unless she won the become thinner everywhere except boobs lottery.
She’s had a boob job, it’s pretty obvious. She’s also had butt implants. It became obvious after the first round of weight loss. Her butt looked like half a basketball stuck on a plank of wood. ANd same with the boob job, it looked natural when it had more fat covering it,
It is possible to carry weight like that though. It’s pretty common in former eastern bloc countries to have that sort of shape (not an inverted triangle shape, but skinny everywhere with big boobs- i think its a lollipop shape?). It’s not common in the western world however..
damn it im so tired of this girl …
I can believe her legs are size 2 but there is NO way her butt fits into a size 2.
I’m size 2 on top but a size 4 in pants because my hips/butt won’t fit.. and they are nowhere near as big as hers.
she looks amazing but why lie about your size?
(sadly) she is a rolemodel and her and other celebrities obsession with being a size 2 (as in hey- i’m going to lie about being a size 2- because being any bigger is ‘fat’). That fact she plugs a diet pill pisses me off too.
however the weight thing could maybe be possible, she is much shorter than people think- closer to 5ft.
she has a nice body and she has a pretty face.kim however is not 109 pounds i refuse to believe that.i would say kim is a size 4/6 not 2.
USA is another world…none of the people on the cover of the magazine are famous in Europe, apart from Britney. Who on earth are kardasian sisters? Why are they famous for? Singers, actresses, just rich like Paris?
i live in the US and even I dont know what theyre famous for!lol
NOT AGAIN!!!!!! UGHHHHH LOL…tired of this shit
wasn’t she saying she was initially a size 2?
how the heck did she drop from a 6 to a 2.
I’m 5’4, 109 pounds, but i look a bit fatter than her…..
oh come’on kill her already! she is annoying like hell…..you loose weight for your own good not for us. we don’t care if you are fat like a pig.
can someone please tell me what is the european size for size 2 ans size 6 ? thank you!
size 0(us)= size 4 (uk)= eu 30
size 2(us)= size 6 (uk)= eu 32
size 4(us)= size 8 (uk)= eu 34
size 6(us)= size 10 (uk)= eu 36
roughly but shops vary due to vanity sizing.
suuuuuuure…
I have NEVER seen size 30 or 32 in my entire life and I live in Europe.
I barely see size 34.
So what the hell are you talking about? These sizes don’t exist.
Even worse, you are truly making girls that are size 38,let’s say, feel bad. Size 38 is thin and is in no way size 8 US – more like 4.
There is no need for you to reply to me in such a rude fashion.
perhaps its more like size 0= 32, size 2= 34, size 8=36 etc.
It really depends on the shop itself because of vanity sizing.
In some shops I am 34 or 36.. but I am always a size 6/8 in the uk.
oh and furthermore I don’t see how posting a size conversion chart is in anyway implying that a size 38 is fat. how rude.
where do you live by the way?
some sizes seem to vary by country…
I do think Marion’s attitude was uncalled for, but I also find those sizes to be incorrect because of vanity sizing. I’m a UK8 in the majority of UK stores, US2 in most North American stores and EU36/34 in most European stores. I’ve lived in all three areas (in case someone thinks I’ve based this on one-week shopping trips or something).
Meh, guys/gals sizing is completely arbitrary. I went to go buy a pair of jeans yesterday. I went to 3 different stores and had to get different sizes ranging from 4 to 10. I’m 38-26-38. Yes, I’m a fatass but that is beside the point. The point i’m making is that what size you get will be entirely dependent on the cut of the garment and the fabric it is made out of. The measurements of the garments themselves are chosen by the company. Some run big and some run small. There is no set sizing standard at all in the industry. I have to laugh when people brag about being a certain size because like I said-it’s arbitrary. it changes from brand to brand so it’s pointless to try to pin it down.
Oh i need to caveat that I’m an American so those are American sizes and measurements in Inches. Europe has a standardized system for clothing but America doesn’t, the UK also has a standard but it is not enforced so very few companies follow it. Therefore it is indeed folly to try and convert sizes in truth.
Completely agree with you! Every place I go to find clothes, I’m a different size. It’s ridiculous. I would get so mad at myself because I thought I gained weight and then the next place would put me at a smaller size. I’ve learned to just ignore numbers (to some extent). If it feels good and I look good in it, I’m happy.
This is so true. Everytime I go shopping I enter in one store and I’m like “wow,i gained a bit” and then i enter another one and say “did I lose weight?”. It is really bad…difficult aCTUALLY
P.S.:Why do you call youself fatass?Your measurements are really good!
Ann, your measurements are great! Don’t call yourself a fatass.
Size 2? Yeah, okay, Kim.
thanks lucia! but like marion said, i’ve never seen a size 32 in europe.
i looked on different websites but the conversion is not the same
oh dayumm go make a sex tape w/Reggie. wink! i glanced at this mag in the store cuz i dont waste my money on any of them. she stated she went from 125 to 109. and last year she claimed she her starting weight was 116. she lies back and forth about her weight thats why people dont believe her. she does look nice but she will never be J-lo. To me her face looked better before she lost all that weight…looks like she had some work done. and with those breast implants she aint hardly a size 2. more like a size 6.
i don’t like her new skinny body, everyone has that body what made her unique was her sexy curvy body that made all curvy women proud..
Maybe someone cut the “1″ out of her size “12″ pants… then she was like “OMG MOM I’M A SIZE 2!!!”
LMFAO!!!!! I can hear her now with that fake voice “omg u guys are not going to believe this…………im a 12″. lol
I could see that! LOL.
I always ask the woman at bluenotes (where I get my jeans) to measure me properly so I know what size fits best. I like to be comfy and I want to know my true size. Maybe Kim should get properly measured next time she goes shopping.
http://collegecandy.files.wordpress.com/2008/12/02/kardash.jpg
Thats her without makeup … and look at that butt! I promise this isn’t an edited photo. She was caught on her way to the gym… probably to eat the protein shakes and stare at guys… rather than work out.
Ohhhh but she looks so good in this photo!!! Pretty and youthful, not fake and plasticky like she usually looks!
I know her ass is huge and everything, but it’s a very nice shape and doesn’t sag, and she has a tiny waist and big boobs…So I think she’s actually quite beautiful. She should just wear less makeup and she’d be all set!
Kim…Kardashian…needs…to go…away…please! I’m so tired of her! Sorry, I just needed to get that off my chest, phew that feels better
those photos of khloe and kourtney in the top corner are very weird/distorted. they toally changed the background of khloe’s photo, the same one Kim posted on Twitter “without khloe’s permission” and now it’s being published on a magazine.
ENOUGH OF THE KARDASHIANS ALREADY!!! Who cares? She is a big liar, pathetic and annoying! Like all her family… I don’t believe anything she says because it is not possible!!!! She just needs attention and this is what she is getting right now! She wears tones of makeup and all the pictures coming out are photoshopped anyway!
I dont understand why Kim puts so much attention on her size and weight. Perhaps cause of that oh so healthy diet pill endorsement she does but between the countless interviews and even when she crammed herself into the size 27 jeans for all to see – its ridiculous. it doesnt matter what size you are or how much you weight. i have seen ugly size 25 jean bodies and some really sexy size 28 bodies. everyone wears weight differently and alot of factors go into it.
Wait, so the measurements 34-26-39 equals to a size 2, but the new 15 lb. lighter Kim also equals a 2? I have those measurements and I’m a 6 and she and I are damn near the same height. My ass is huge (I don’t mind) and I know for sure that i can’t squeeze it into a 2 dress or jeans. So, which one is it? Before weight loss, she was supposedly 117, but now she says she was 124? Whether she is or isn’t 109, she lied the whole way through her weigh loss. It’s just a little insulting that females who have similar shapes to Kim and I have to watch this delusional woman tell us she’s lighter, thinner, and wears super-small sizes compared to us. At least I know my 125 lb size, size 6 figure is just fine and I’m not gonna’ advertise itty bitty numbers. Pathetic…
I just can’t stand her,sorry.
Go here for a workout to get a body like Kim Kardashian: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YqGztUdz70A
The exercise looks effective, but omg the guy narrating is so funny! Work that butt! Squeeze it like a fist! Squeeze, squeeze, squeeze, it should be hard as a rock! Hahahahaha, I had to laugh…
kim is beautiful, but she once said she LOVES curves, and now she just looks flat with no shape she could gain weight but ppl like her at times r paranoid about stuff like weight!!!
she still pretty like i said but i loved her old body
There is no way that girl is a size 2. My mother in law just got fit for a dress and she’s 5 foot 3 about 102lbs..she is so tiny.. no butt or hips and maybe a size C boobs.. (which are fake) With hips and boobs like Kim’s I would say at the smallest she’s a size 5, about 125. There is no shame in that. I really don’t understand why all these stars lie.
You guys are lieing and stop hating on her she did loose 15 pounds. Your just jealous because (removed by admin) and have nothing better to do. She is a size 3. My husbands sister is 5’7 and weights 130 and wears a size 2. YOur just a bunch of (removed by admin).
OMG i love kim and her curves ( i would do anything for that butt!) but seriousl she’s not a size 2 ! Im 5,6 and 117 pounds, alright i got hips but my stomach is flat and im not very chesty, and im already a size 4-6 ! Theres no way she fits into a size 2 with those hips, ass and boobs !
Many thanks for taking this possiblity to discuss this, I am strongly over it and I take advantage of studying this subject. If at all, as you gain data, please update this web site with new information. I have found it extremely useful.
yeah maybe her ass is 108lbs!
she’s so gorgeous
Hello world! Click my nombre