Experiment: How Would Kim Look with a Small Butt?
September 20, 2008 in Celebrity Weight & Measurements, Kim Kardashian, Photoshop Job by Versus
Why did I choose to do this little Photoshop experiment? Two reasons:
1. Because Kim’s butt is probably the most commented and debated body part belonging to a celebrity and many have wondered how Kim would look without the overly discussed booty.
2. Some are saying (or were saying, 7 lbs before) that Kim’s too thick / chubby and other such aberrations. Well, my little experiment shows that if we remove the big butt from the picture, we get the image of a very slim girl.
What do you say? Did Kim lose her charm in the second photo? Or do you prefer the tiny booty instead of the super-booty?
Note: This picture was edited by skinnyvscurvy.com for enjoyment reasons only and the above is simply meant to be a lighthearted game.
wow, what a big difference, it almost looks like the first one is unreal!
wow! without her behind, she would have nothing physically special about her. she looks like a average woman on the street. i guess all she has going for her is her behind.. so sad. she might be a smart woman.
Like a dude, total flat man butt. No offense to women at healthy weights with flat butts (can’t change genetics) but someone blessed with that butt, should never lose it, that’s just a sin.
I love the super booty! So sexy!!
She is sexy as hell with or without but that ass is god tier! Anyone saying she’s too thick is obviously (and I say this with no racial bias) white. Why? Because I’ve noticed that only people of ethnicity appreciate thicker women. I find that most white men like very slim to skinny girls. Espcially when it comes to asses. Never understood it myself but to each their own. She is far from chunky or heavy….How do you justify calling someone with a flat stomach chunky? LOL Nice pic and concept btw…..
I TOTALLY AGREE!!
she has veri beauti face, hair, complexion
and this butt…
yh
i prefer kim without it:P
big butt