Rachel Zoe and Kelly Ripa at Super Saturday Event
August 1, 2010 in Kelly Ripa, Rachel Zoe by Versus

Super skinny and petite ladies Rachel Zoe and Kelly Ripa attended (and hosted, respectively) the Super Saturday event in Watermill, NY yesterday… and looked cute in summery dresses.
Rachel is 38 and Kelly is 39!

See these ladies closer after the jump!












They are to skinny for my personal taste, but I do love Zoe´s eyecolour!
Cute? Far from it. I brought up Ripa in the other Zoe post… There’s thin and then there’s THIN, These women look so old and haggard. They look like little kids playing dress up.
isn’t kelly ripa just toned and by the definition of this site… healthy?
LOL! And they certainly glow but that might just be down to the excessive sun exposure or fake tan.
Kelly Ripa is in better shape than most of us here I bet AND she has a family. She actually can be seen around town CARRYING her child who must be around 4 of 5. So obviously she IS fit. I doubt Zoe has the strength sometimes to hold up her enormous purses at times…
By definition of the viewers / commentators on this site, Kelly is only healthy because she was not photographed at a higher weight. Otherwise she’d be “unhealthy”.
But in reality she is very fit and toned. Certainly in great shape.
But KR never used to be that thin, right? I know that weight fluctuates over time, sometimes by a lot, but she looks kinda shrunken to me, esp. on TV. She has admitted to having eating disorders in the past, and uses the old “I don’t work out, I just run after my kids!” line. Kids can keep you busy, but not like that. And I *think* but am not positive that she said her husband only likes skinny women, so she has to stay in shape for him.
IMO they both look about 10 years old than their actual age. Kelly’s body looks like it belongs on a 20 year old, but her face looks mid 40s. And yes, they are both too skinny, especially Kelly…I really worry about her daughter’s body image as she matures.
If they would be the poster-people for being skinny I’d be eating 5000 calories a day to ensure I don’t look like that.
They both look like 50 year olds with too much botox and too little bone density. So unattractive.
Both of them I feel are a little old to be so stick thin, that said I love both their outfits, especially Rachel`s. I just wish she`d follow in Nicole`s footsteps and put on a little weight.
for the first time, I actually find rachel zoe attractive…
kelly looks better covered up..but she looks like 0 body fat, a bit ew! And rachel Zoe looks too thin, but has she had botox on her forehead recently? looks like it
I think you’re right Katy. She was much more crinkly before.
I love Kelly but she is too thin
Between the two of them there is at least 20% body fat. We can combine numbers, right?
Rachel should be rockin’ her skinny body, instead she dresses like a hippie.. bleh – - plus her face always looks weird
No she shouldn’t. Have you see here without clothing? Not hot. This draping dress helps conceal her creepy, unnatural bones.
These ladies will not age well in the face. I admit that I admire Kelly’s level of fitness but I’m not a fan of this body type. She is also sort of boring looking. There really isn’t anything special about her.
uhhh.. they have beautiful smiles…
That’s the best I’ve ever seen Rachel Zoe’s face look. I like their dresses. I think they look good.
Usually i don’t like the botoxed-up look, but Rachel had such severe lines in her forehead and mouth area i actually think she looks better now. (I mean i think she’s had botox, either that or a very good make-up artist) They’re both kinda too skinny for what i’d consider appealing, but truth be told, they’re about the size i feel the most comfortable in as well (Kelly more so than Zoe), so i’m not the best of judges. (except if the stories about Rachels eating habits have any truth in them..) They both look quite nice, love Rahcel’s dress.
I was watching an episode of supersize vs superskinny, and there was this red headed chick in her early 40′s and she looked way older and had all this wrinkles on her face, and the Doc was telling her that when you don’t eat enough and get enough nutrients, that it will actually age you and make you look worse. If I had to choose between being skinny and old looking or average weight and young looking, I would take the extra pounds, wouldn’t you?
Also, I can’t wait to see Rachel’s rockin hump back. You’ve all seen them. Anorexic Quasi Motos. The consequences of osteoporosis. It’s so not worth it.
I have always liked Rachel’s style, but ewww, she looks malnourished and much older than she is. Kelly is super toned but would look great with another 10-20lbs on.
Kelly looks a lot healthier than Rachel in my honest opinion.
I think so too. Kelly is muchmuch prettier than Zoe.
They don’t do much for me. Too skinny and on top of that teire style is not my cup of tea either. Rachel could have used a bit more colour with that dress.
They both look older then they are.
Please just don’t tell me they hang out together. If healthy little Kelly Ripa hangs out with that old hag I’ll be very disappointed. Kelly is a healthy, skinny little thing. Whereas Rachel is a don anything to be skinny (looks like she just added some botox to her facelift)….thank goodness shes started covering up that chest of hers!
I’lll include (by Hollywood standards) to the Kelly “summary”