Kelly Brook’s Tight & Black Latex Look
September 29, 2009 in Hot Models, Kelly Brook by Versus
You might wonder: What are these pictures for?
Possible answer: For a men’s magazine, hence the cleavagey, tight, rubber outfits?
Correction: No. They are in fact for a Charity Action, where, among others, Cheryl Cole is selling her fuchsia Rupert Sanderson pumps and Leona Lewis is offering her Stella McCartney strappy sandals with the hope of raising $1 million to fund research into women’s reproductive and gynae health issues. Hmm… interesting, I mean it’s a good cause, but most pictures that advertise the initiative (not just Kelly’s) are kinda sexy / raunchy / topless.
Anyway, Kelly’s figure looks impossibly hourglassy yet again.
There’s more after the jump! Check out what Kelly has to say about this event!
um what’s up with that quote of hers? I don’t really know much about her but it makes her sound like a complete air head (although I’m sure the marketing department had a lot to do with it) and seems to be in sharp contrast to the idea of charity. apart from that though I still think her body looks awsome .. she’s got a great shape with curves in all the right places.
Yeah, same dress designer that did her last dress (the belted part is identical)
Anyone know the designer out of curiosity?
yeah im interested too, coz its pretty good damn designer than:P
i know she’s a very small waist but these corset design makes her waist invisible
i think the quote is pretty stupid as well
I think her dress is by a corset and latex designer called Lady Lucie??
Pretty & sexy…
i don’t really like how they incorporated the shoes into the ad (especially the first two pics look incredibly silly), but at least Kelly looks great.
Kelly looks fabulous!!! Her body is just so amazing! I agree with the other posters about some of the pictures. The shoes are a little silly and this is an odd way to raise money for charity. But I guess it’s true that sex sells…
Definitely appealing to the men with these outfits. Her waist is tiny and she just looks gorgeous.
Wow what a figure, especially in the 2nd photo! Is she corset training? There seems to be an outline of a corset again, or that may be part of the look of the dress. A while back she was wearing another dress with a corset looking thing underneath it.
Her expression in the first photo is priceless.
why she use corset under her dresses? i mean its kind of the desing of her dresses :S
anyway she’s super hot
As far as photo shopping goes… I don’t know. If they did, they did a very good job of hiding it. I know Kelly’s waist is practically non-existent, but it looks even smaller in these photos (especially if you compare to some past bikini shots of her.)
Lurve?
That quote makes her seem like such a retard. Other than that, she looks great…silly outfits, yehh, but sexy!!
I don’t want to sound horrible, because I think Kelly Brook has a great figure and she seems nice enough, but I don’t find anything particular admirable about her. She doesn’t really do anything, just famous for having a good body that she reveals often; like Kim K.
I mean Marilyn Monroe, Rita Hayworth, and the contemporary Beyonce and Scarlet Johansson, were/are also famous for their figures but they were also noted for their acting/singing talents so there’s more substance to them.
With Kelly Brook, its just her body really, and that’s just something she was blessed with, so I can’t think of any talents that I can credit her for.
yeah i agree
im going to sound horrible anyways but yeah i know im a brat
the bikini candids are nice but nothing special, i mean if i go to the beach i see a lot of girls with the same body. the only difference is that her body gets help from a so called photoshop thing and build-in corsets. every woman would be freakingly sexy if they get photoshop help and build in corsets
in a topless bikini candid her boobs were like liquid and they touched her belly
so yeah, she is girl next door IMO and no talents
stupid quote anyways
ok ima stopping being horrible
I’ve seen various topless pics of her, and I don’t recall any where her boobs were touching her belly. Her ribcage? Yea, that’s where larger breasts tend to touch when they drape, but they were no where near her belly
Okay, I liked her until I saw the quote.
If you read the magazine its a special issue on ‘Heels that Heal’ and there is a bunch of celebraties who are in the magazine talking about heels and how they make them feel . .soo its hardly a stupid comment.
A perfectly contrasting ad campaign, her “good girl” look wraped up in erotic attire, with a little bimbo on the side. Love it!
If I could pull off that look I’d wear it too! I wish we saw more of her in the US. Check out my EXCLUSIVE scoop on tonight’s The Hills premiere at http://www.Twitter.com/ChristyReports.
the quote is terrible.
hot hot hot!!! love this girl!
She doesn’t really need to wear a corset (she does in these pictures) because she already has an amazing figure! I thought she was older than 29, she looks somehow older to me.
me too i thought she was older than 29. but her look in the first pic cracks me up. i bet she has a really down to earth person. and yes she has a nice figure.
The first pic is sooo funny!
She’s very pretty and she has a great body!
isnt her figure 32E-24-35. i have the exact same measurements
besides the E parts. am 2 sizes down
photoshopped hips and waist and freaky eyes in the 1st pic…I mean it’s not enough to squeeze her in a corset, they have to photoshop that too…she has a great body and fantastic boobs, so don’t get me wrong, I’ve seen candids of her in a bikini…but this is just ridiculous. Even her measurements don’t sound right.
She does have an hourglass figure, but those tight PVC dresses act a bit like a corset and push out the hips. Look at Kelly in a bikini, and her waist is not that small in relation to her hips as it appears in this PVC dress. Either it’s the dress, or a tad of photoshop?