Kelly Brook in Loaded Magazine
August 31, 2009 in Kelly Brook, Photoshop Job by Versus
OK, so here’s Kelly Brook in Loaded Magazine, looking…
- less curvy than usually in picture number 1 (but not only), especially in the hips / thighs area.
- very, very busty in the other pics (yes, more than in reality).
See how Kelly looks on the beach HERE!
Of course there’s more after the jump!
Share your thoughts!
Her boobies look kinda plastic to me here. But overall hotness.
there is so much photoshop in these pictures and many others these days! why do they even use a real person?! they could just draw the girls and it would be the same thing, with less money and resources!
This is what I’ve said all along. I rarely ever admire magazine models because they are not even real. Show me someone who looks great in real life and then I’ll call them pretty.
I’m not saying Kelly doesn’t look great in real life, but these pictures are practically cartoons.
I was just going to say that.
In the first picture, she looks one dimensional. Like a carboard cut-out.
It’s RIDICULOUS!
that would be 2 dimensional then
Ah, yeah she’s hot, but these pictures are why girls have poor body image. :\ too much photoshop, in my opinon.
True say.
Just as a girl can look at a slim image of Victoria Beckham and restrict themselves to a life of apples and diet coke a girl can look at photoshopped images of Kelly Brook plastered everywhere and book their appointments for boob and hip implants and lipo on the waist.
perfection!
Yes indeed!
She looks gorgeous
She looks amazing but seriously, they didnt need to increase her chest its already huge, I actually think they look a million times better naturally! Lovely face and body
She’s gorgeous and practically perfect without photoshop, ridiculous that they used it for this spread.
Bad photoshop, she looks absolutely fake :/
I saw these photos on http://www.thesuperfica.com, if only men knew that these photos weren’t horribly photoshopped….
*www.superficial.com
Funnily enough I think the men are more aware these images are photoshopped than us women are!
Her legs in the first picture look totally ridiculous – she doesn’t even look like herself in that picture in particular. In the last two – WHAT have they done to her boobs? It isn’t like she has bee stings naturally anyway, her boobs are big as it is – no need to make them ridiculous! All that aside – she looks good. Or at least, the person in the pictures who is so photoshopped she doesn’t even look like Kelly Brook looks good…
Honestly, I don’t think she looks good at all, quite in contrast to her normal appearance. I look forward to every appearance of Kelly Brook b/c she is so voluptuous, and she is often wearing a really cute smile that makes me think she loves life. Her legs here have no shape or contour. Do we need to see her ribcage? I think not. And thinning her body makes her breasts all out of proportion. I guess some guys must think this sort of thing looks good, but not me.
Definitely photoshopped, but she still looks hot. I do however think she looks great without it.
I am sorry but the boobage editing is just ludicrous – especially in the second pic
I agree these pics are photoshopped a lot; that’s how the industry goes, huh?
She has a natural good body though I think she is hyped up a lot. I think she gets more attention for her curves because she shows them more than other curvy celebs do ie. constant images of her promoting bikinis on the beach and her numerous lingerie shoots. You don’t see as many revealing pics of Scarlet Johansson etc.
This isn’t a criticism, just an observation!
She Has An Amazing BODY.
A REAL PERFECT BODY .
Why The Heck She is Photo Shopped?
her breasts are look ultra big . it doesnt look natural !