Kelly Brook in a Bikini!
June 28, 2010 in Hot Models, Kelly Brook by Versus
What a hot and curvy bikini treat!
Here’s British glamour babe Kelly Brooke in Barbados today, doing what she does best: looking great in a bikini.
How do you like hourglassy Kelly?
So many more after the jump!
wowww her body is soo cool. in my opinion, her body, monica bellucci’s, scarlet johansson’s (before she lost weight) and candice what’s-her-name (swaen-something) have the best celebrity bodies! oh and audrina par..something lol the one from the hills
I’m confused as to why you’d include Audrina & her terrible implants on a list with such amazing natural beauties?
exactly what i was thinking!
ohhh yess, agree on Monica Bellucci (to me she’s the most beautiful woman alive), and Kelly has a nice figure too,soft but beautiful, with weight in the right places
… i meant to respond to la la la above…
Luv her body! Voluptuous. Nice waist too!
WOW. Just WOW.
wow! nothing else to say. her body is perfect.
In some pictures, her waist look quite straight, like the second and third pictures. In the first picture it looks smaller, though. People always rave about Kelly’s WHR, but i think that Demi Lovato’s waist was better when we saw her bikini pics a few weeks ago.
In the last few pictures, her boobs don’t look very natural – i don’t want to sound nasty, but honestly they look like they’re sitting too firmly on her chest, and real big boob should look softer than that shouldn’t they? They look fake in these photos:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-1271133/Piranha-3D-Does-Kelly-Brook-meet-gory-end-latest-film.html
However, this is just my opinion – i’m open to everyone elses’ comments. =)
It is well known kelly is natural
She used to be a glamour model
http://theblemish.com/2010/05/kelly-brook-topless-in-loaded/kelly-brook-loaded-04/
I don’t think her waist looks that defined in this picture you posted… Although maybe it’s just the angle? Her boobs do look natural in it though. I think the reason i thought Kelly’s bust looked fake in these pictures was due to the bikini top she’s wearing.
I don’t know why, but i’m just not as stricken by Kelly’s looks as other people on this site seem to be. I’m not a jealous person, because there other celebrities who i look at and say, “Wow!”
“I don’t know why, but i’m just not as stricken by Kelly’s looks as other people on this site seem to be. I’m not a jealous person, because there other celebrities who i look at and say, “Wow!” ” My exact thoughts! lol
Great minds think alike Hannah, lol. I think that people like Halle Berry, Leighton Meester, Katy Perry, Zoe Dechanel and Jennifer Love Hewitt are “Wow!” girls lol. =D
I see a curvy woman with a good waist/hip ratio. Apart from her @ss, the proporitions are look practically identical to Kim Kardashian. Three is nothing ‘straight’ about her body IMO.
I honesty don’t know about the fake boobs, but she’s always been known for her big boobs so unless she had them done before she was like 16 they are in all likelihood the real deal.
Yep
She has modeling since the age of 16.
I think she looks staright to you because she doesn’t have much booty. Even Candice has more backside…which accentuates the small waist even more. However, I don’t think anyone can argue that she is not curvy, or not an hourglass. She’s definetly not a “straight” body-type, even without a butt.
straight*
Her breasts do look a little unnatural in the pictures you posted, but every single time there is photoshopping or push up action involved, big breasts are going to look like implants.
I’m pretty sure Kelly’s boobs are real. She has a bunch of topless pictures on the net…just Google them. In her topless pictures, her breasts have a natural sag and softness to them. Also, it’s not like she has Heidi Montag balloons. It’s not uncommon for women to have boobs as big as Kelly’s.
awful swimsuit, esp the bottom
her boty type – not my cup of tea
her face is not appealing to me
I envy her bod. She’s hot. She has a nicely defined waist just like Candice Swanepoel
I really like Kelly, but I looked her up and saw alot of her other pictures, and she seems so boring and plain. Other pictures of her on the beach, like this one, she looks so good. She is so soft and natural looking and I feel better about myself when I see her. She looks good in all of these pictures.
Love her body!I`m not seeing in any of the photos with her waist looking straight.But i think she knows that there is paparazzi somewhere cos sometimes she`s like she`s posing for them
She has an amazing body. Hourglass, pear, straight….WHR………..none of that matters it’s bull****. She looks good and that’s enough…..plus feeling good on the inside exudes confidence on the outside. Total hottie.
Her hair is a mess.
Her swimsuit doesnt fits her at all.
Her body is nothing intresting.
And i know it sounds funny but she looks kinda ill-kept !
She is on a beach. Is she supposed to look like she’s getting ready for a photoshoot? I mean I don’t do my hair just to get it wet..duh.
No,no,no,no,no you didnt understand me at all i mean that I dont like her hair.First of all she has got about a hundred colors on her head and her haircut is awful,and it looks kinda orange…and i just cant explain it but its quite a mess
It’s ok, nobody can be as perfect as you ash, oh wait, what?
perfect. just flawless.
She is perfect. I love her figure.
LOVE IT
The suit fits her well I think. When you have an ass it’s very hard to keep it all in a bikini bottom. Unless you get a boyshort kind of bottom. So her fixing herself in the pics, is natural. All girls do it. She looks hot, her figure is nice. I wish my thighs looked liked that. Nice hip/waist ratio.
wow SHE IS THICK!! I mean that in a good way! I had no idea she was THAT curvy!
Lol!
I know what you mean but I always thought the term ‘thick’ was more appropriate for women like Megan Good. who are a tad bit meatier.
She’s so hot I wanna jump trough my computer screen. Her body is PERFECTION!! And I love her even moore for spending that much time on the beach.. ;D
i am turning lesbian:)
Well, I’m not turning lesbian but I think she could teach me to “switch hit”. LOL
Whoever said she is thick must be kidding. She has a great body shape and looks really great in these pictures, but she is SKINNY. I think she might’ve lost weight, but especially her legs are tiny.
I don’t necessarily think she would look better if she gained weight now, but I do think she would be better looking if her body was naturally about 10 pounds heavier.
I’m sure they meant it in a good way, i.e. she has meat in all the right places : P
If she was to gain 10lb, then it should be muscle. She is soft and curvy so she doesn’t need to gain fat….she is perfect in that regard.
‘thick’ is a vernacular term for curvy and it is very complimentary. However, girls I usually hear referred to as thick are slightly meatier, as in way more booty and tighter thighs.
Yes, to me ‘thick’ has always been a very positive term. If someone is carrying too much body fat I will come right out and say it rather than trying to sugarcoat with words like ‘thick’ or ‘curvy’, which IMO should be reserved for girls like Kelly Brook, Kim Kardashian, Beyonce, etc, we all know the type!
What I meant by saying she’s not thick is that I don’t like her body enough to call her thick. Thick, I think, is someone like Chrisetta Michele or Nicki Minaj. I prefer them to her.
Nah she is a short girl, 5 foot 2 or something, to gain 10lbs would be quite significant, and even if she werent short, she looks fine as she is and if she gained 10lbs, specially if it were fat, it would do her no favours health or looks wise. To be honest kelly, along with Kim K, is the very biggest I think the mainstream find “hot” as in pin-up hot (not every day hot). There is that one woman, Christina Hendricks, who is bigger…but In europe and in the UK she isn’t famous at all where as guys all over drool over Kelly and Kim, even if they are famous for nothing (Kelly models, I know, but Kim why is she famous?)
Kelly is definitely not 5ft2, she’s rumoured to around 5ft8. She probably has virtually the same sort of stats as Kim Kardashian, just taller and less booty.
I always thought she was tiny, i googled it and she’s 5 feet 6, which is neither tall nor short but women in the media lie a lot about their height so she may be smaller than that. Either way like I said tall or small if she gained 10lbs she’d be less attractive to a lot of people and her looks are her job.
Depends what she gained 10lb of….10lb of extra muscle certainly wouldn’t make her less attractive.
If she is 5’8 then I suddenly had a growth spurt. I’m exactly 5’7 and I once net her and she was wearing flats -there were at least 2 to maybe 3 inch difference between us. So I guess she’s like 5’5.
She says she is 5″8
She doesn’t even look 5″2 lol
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-1288850/Kelly-Brook-parties-troubles-away-hitting-London-town-FOURTH-night.html
Don’t worry snoops i used to think Megan fox was 5″9
I think the fact that everyone easily believes people are much taller than they are shows you can’t really tell someone’s height from looking at them.
Gorgeous woman and i do think it comes to her quite effortlessly. She seems to be skinny in all the right places too. If she was slimmer people would be commenting on how you can see her spine when she bends.
wow indeed! she does look good in her bikinis.
i just loooooooooooove hourglass shapes !
She looks good in her bikini, but nothing special to me. I just love her boobs cause they’re not small but not like Pamela’s either, but other than that I don’t find anything particular. I like more a girl with a nice ass and small firm tits, rather than big boobs and no butt. Judging from the back, I would not look at her twice(but from the front I would, ha ha!!)
STOP THE PRESS! – kelly’s spine 100% is visible in that photo from behind where she is picking something up. She must be seiously ill and have a disorder! Heh
So many times I’ve seen that said about thin women on this site who have totally normal bones exposed at certain angles, like this. Its a silly way to gauge heath.
I was thinking the same!
perfect body :O
wow. love it. looks really good!
I lover he body. Its a lot like mine if only my thighs were thinner
id like yours more
Beautiful…
She’s beautiful.. However I’m not a fan of that type of body, even thoung I’ve got an hourglass/athletic type.. I just don’t like it that much…
I love her body- she is the antithesis of everything that is thrown at us that is supposed to be beautiful- she is pale (no awful fake tan), not toned to within an inch of her life, natural breasts. Gorgeous.
Thats one ugly swimsuit.
NOW THAT’S A WOMAN.
For her shape, she has one of the best bodies I have ever seen. I also agree that it’s nice to see a white girl without a tan! While I tan the moment I go outside, I like to see girls representing the pale look…
i wish if i gained 20lbs i’d look like that. very sexy. body types are amazing.
I’m going to guess her weight and stats based on the face that she is 5ft8.
Weight: 130lb-135lb (9 1/2 stone).
Fullbust: 35″
Bra size: 30E
Waist: 26″
Hips/Buttocks: 37″
US size 6 – AUS/UK size 10
What do you guys reckon?
Sounds close. To me, she looks slightly curvier than that though. My measurements are 35″ 26″ 38″ (A 32DD cup), and I’m 5’5″ – I also weight 125-130lbs depending on the day. And she still looks curvier than I do. I mean, I’m curvy, but she looks like her hips are bigger than mine. I’d say it’s more like 36″ 26″ 40″ – and maybe 135lbs. That’s my guess.
I’m far too lazy to look it up though.
I seriously doubt Kelly’s hips are 40 inches. Even though she has quite a small waist in relation to her hips, her hips are still quite narrow in comparison to the average woman. Kelly’s hips look wide to some people because they are fairly wide in proportion to her waist.
I would say that measurements of 36D – 26 -36 sound more accurate.
You say you don’t appear curvy with 38 inch hips and a 26 ins waist at 5ft5. This could be down to a number of reasons….
1) Hip measurements take your butt into account, as well as just your hips. WHR is from the side as well as the front.
2) You could have a long torso that drags your waist out and makes it appear less defined.
3) Your waist might be broad, but flat. Waist measurement takes into account the flatness, not just the width.
Or…. It simply might be the choice of clothes you wear, which make your waist seem less curvy. =)
I don’t think 36 on the hips really. She’s of a larger frame (like Bar Rafaeli) bones-wise. Pear shapes like Jessica Lowndes appear more curvy but look lighter you know?
Yeah but it might be due to her butt being quite small while her hips are wider?
Yes, but her hips are not that wide. They’re nowhere near as wide as the average British woman’s lol!
The average british woman measures about 41 inches around her hips….that said, in most cases it’s more due to extra fat than bone structure.
It’s quite possible Kelly has wider hips than the average british woman, but due to her pelvic structure not because she has excess fat.
No, i doubt Kelly’s pelvic bones are larger than the average British woman’s, even without the extra fat she may have.
Kelly does have a little fat on her hips, and even now they’re not overly wide. Plenty of British women, like my aunty, would have hips wider than Kelly’s even if they were a skeleton with no fat, because they have wide hip bones. Kelly doesn’t. She may have a low WHR, but it’s possible to have narrow hips and a low WHR.
As a result of my auntie’s wide pelvic stucture, when her body holds the fat it needs to protect these bones, her hips are a UK size 14 (US 10), even though her waist is slim and she isn’t overweight. If Kelly’s hips were a UK 14, she would be overweight because her hip bones are not that wide. She’s a healthy weight, and her hips are only a UK size 8/10 with a little bit of fat on them. If you took away that fat, they’d be UK size 6 hips, which is much narrower than the average British woman’s pelvic structure, minus the fat…. Add to this the fact that Kelly is tall at 5ft 8, and the average British woman is only 5ft 4, her hips are only narrow.
I’m 5ft 2.5 & my hips are the same width as Kelly’s, but because she is taller hers are narrower for her height – as height increases, hip width increases proportionally if you want the same “wideness”. 35 inch hips on a 5ft woman are completely different to 35 inches on a 6ft woman (yes, i know Kelly isn’t 6ft, but i’m not talking about her, i’m giving an example)….. On a 6ft woman, 42 inch hips are roughly the equivalent of 35 inch ones on a 5ft woman.
I’m 5’9″ and I think your weight guess is too low. At 130 lbs, I look very, very thin and I don’t have the bust she does. I’d say if 5’8″ is truly her height then she may be closer to 140 lbs. Not that there’s anything wrong with it – I think she looks fantastic!!!
she’s got to be a size 12 uk, which is size 8 in US, wouldnt put her at any bigger or smaller than that. My sis is a size 10 uk and cant fit into any size 8′s, she is 5 foot 7 has curves but not as big as this girl, so theres no way shes fitting those hips into anything smaller than a 12, just due to her shape.
I don’t think Kelly is a US size 8.
I think we are used to seeing curves in this way: normal-sized waist combined with big hips. Kim Kardashian is an example. And those people typically do need bigger sizes to fit their large hips.
However, Kelly’s body is not like that. She has normal-sized hips and an abnormally small waist. It produces the same curves as above, but the person is not larger than the average person.
Gemma Arterton is a US size 6. I would say Kelly is somewhere around her size, given her height. I bet she could fit into some stretchy size 4 dresses too.
I saw Kelly Brook when I lived in London. She is much thinner and shorter in person than she looks in photos. I would say she is around 5ft 5 possibly even 5ft 4. I would also say she is about dress size EU 36/ UK 8.
As a general most celebrities tend to be shorter than their stated heights and also appear thinner than photos.
I don’t think the boobs add that much weight nor do curves generally, she’s also quite soft indicating lack of muscle and a small frame, hence the low weight guess. If she was more muscular I would have guessed at 140lb.
Wow @ all the varying opinions…just goes to show how we all perceive things differently.
Basically we have guesses from 5ft4-5ft8, 130lb-140lb, size 8 to size 12, 36-40 inch hips….well the correct answer is probably somewhere in that range!
I think accurate. Her body shape is very nice, her butt is quite flat I think and I’d personally prefer a slightly smaller frame? Like that of Megan Fox’s. Kelly’s still a beauty
She’s very pretty in a bikini.
One thing I don’t like about her though… her ass doesn’t look that great.
*sigh*
If only… man I have a lot of work to do. I hope I can look that good one day!
HOT HOT HOT… I’d go lesbian for Kelly Brook!
She definitely isn’t my favorite body type, but I can see how others find her appealing. Her hips are a bit too wide and she’s a bit too “soft” for my taste. Still, I think that she could have chosen a better swimsuit – she looked amazing in the pink version of the same bikini.
That bikini is cute, though I’m more fond of the bottoms that are supposed to be placed lower.
AMAZING body and skin tone, as always, and beautiful smile!
Just… is it her legs that have got slimmer, or the waist that’s got thicker? I don’t know, it looks to me that her torso is slightly heavier on her legs then it used to be, so I think she looks more like a vase than a hourglass here. What do you guys think? And Versus?
Finally, her poses and facial expressions in the frontal pictures seem a little unnatural… Ô_o
Well, Trinny and Susannah say that she is a ‘vase’ shape, but I would say that she is more hourlassy than 99% of the celebrities out there.
The problem with Trinny and Susannah is you only have to look at some of the examples they used in the dailymail to see how hypocritcal the descriptions are….I mean did you see their example of hourglass!!!
She looks good…But i wouldn’t want that for myself, don get me wrong It’s obvious that she works out but I like more athletic bodys
Va va voom! Her body type is coming back in style because people are getting tired of ultra thin women with implants bolted to their chest walls. She has a gorgeous, natural body that’s appreciated by both men and women.
I love this type of body, it’s my favorite…the really extreme WHR and hourglass figure.
I really envy Kelly’s figure, or I thought I did. In these pictures, for some reason her thigh/hip area looks odd. Not that she’s too thick or anything, but it’s just a weird curve into her legs.
However, her waist/breasts are amazing. She reminds me of what’s her name, Raquel Welch in her days. The only difference is Raquel Welch was a lot more fit, but I think if you’re blessed with this kind of figure it doesn’t quite matter how toned or soft you are…you still look good.
I agree about weird looking hips, they look odd and not so sexy imo, I thought her legs were better looking.
Nice bod. I want a thigh gap so badly. Mine’s so small. Damn these narrow hips.
Bodies like Kellys makes me feel a little more confident in my own. Sometimes I wish I had smaller hips or what not, and i’ve had people come up to me on the street to tell me that my waist is too small. A few years ago when I was teenager, these sort of comments really hurt me (along with ones like you’re too tall, or your eyes are too big or your skin is too fair), but as I’ve matured i’ve learnt to ignore them and accept that what one person might perceive as a flaw, another perceives as beautiful (The same things people have insulted me for others have complimented me on). That’s the best thing about beauty- it’s all in the eyes of the beholder. And in the same way, that’s why I always believe it’s important to be humble. Yes, by all means be confident, but don’t walk around thinking that you’re the hottest thing on earth and look down on everyone else, because believe me- not everyone will mirror your own inflated sense of self!
I don’t know what relevance this really has to this post haha, I guess it’s just when people write comments like “now that’s a real woman” I find it really ignorant and demeaning. Every persons body is different, same as how everyones perception of our body is different. Everyone really is beautiful in their own way. It sounds cliche, but it’s true!
I loved this post….Yet i think our upbringing in Western society has a huge impact on what we see as attractive. In traditional African American culture, big butts and thighs were celebrated (maybe they still are haha). In the 1600s, the Rubens liked cellulite and full, pear shaped bodies… Yes, really, cellulite! Some tribes in Africa think that long necks are sexy…. Who are we to say that we’re right, and they are wrong? Both of us are just as guilty of developing an ideal, and anything other than that is ugly/undesirable ect.
I guess that Kelly is the epitome of what we’ve been taught is attractive today… Tall, slim, big boobs.
I agree that there is a lot of diversity in beauty ideals across the globe, but I don’t agree that Kelly’s figure is what we’ve been taught is attractive today – I’m not saying that she’s not attractive, but she’s pretty much the antithesis of what the media wants us to idolize: skinny, tanned, busty, and narrow-hipped a la Gisele.
it goes both ways. you’re either thin or curvy(hips, thighs, small waist, boobs and butt). i think we’re all guilty of having standards of beauty and if women don’t have what society is looking for then they’re ugly or not worthy.
she has a great body. it seems she loves her body and that is something i like and doesn’t hide the fact she has a curvy body. yeah she doesn’t have much of a butt but you don’t always have to have a big butt to be considered curvy.
I agree with you.
However, I do have to say… I wonder if people realize you don’t have to be “curvy” to be sexy/attractive.
well i do
Of course not! If curvy was all people wanted, why would VS models be so popular?
i don’t mean it like that. i like that she is confident but you don’t have to be curvy to be considered beautiful. i talk about that all the time but i do acknowledge women who have curves instead of calling them names like others do.
Totally agree!
Awesome body, ugly swim suit. Well, I don’t hate the pattern or the top, but the bottoms are a little bit of a throw back to the high cut ’80s bikini bottoms.
meh shes so whatever!! i dont get the appeal. her bottoms always look weight around her hips. and her face reminds me of a horse, sorry :/
Lol… I think it’s her long face. She looks like this woman, i wonder if they’re related at all…?
http://www.littlebrown.co.uk/assets/images/Authors/CurrieEdwina.jpg
she’d look better if she lost weight…he hips/butt/upper thighs are too big for my taste
Curvy bodies aren’t my cup of tea, but I’m in awe. Her body is in. sane.
wow she’s so hot *sigh* I love her
I have a similar shape but probably weigh 50lbs more so wouldn’t even think about that bikini
Kelly has an amazing body
Love love love her body, her face, not so much :p
I don’t get the whole fuss about her. To me she looks plain and untoned. Even pudgy in some of the pictures.
And what’s up with the bikini bottoms? Couldn’t she get one that fits her properly if she knows she’s going to be photographed?
I just don’t get it. EVERYBODY talks about Rima Fakih lack of ass, but nobody says a thing about Kelly Brook lack of ass…. I think its racism.
It’s not racism. Kelly Brook has amazing boobs and a tiny waist which make up for her lack of a butt, which is why people don’t complain about it as much. Also, she wasn’t chosen as a representation of beauty as Rima was…Kelly is just a model.
I don’t think it’s racism but you’re right about Kelly Brook having not much more ass than Rima Fakih
Did you see the comments to the whose booty is this post nearby? She’s white and everyone is moaning about her bum being flat. I don’t think it has anything to do with race.
gorgeous!!! never noticed her proprortions before.
[...] THOSE weren’s enough, here’s Episode 2 of “Kelly Brook in a Bikini Sexy [...]
wow she has an amazing body
all i see is too wide hips, on a short woman! sorry this type of bodies,are kinda funny lookin ‘ to me lol nothin’ special! like somebody said here earlier, Halle Berry and similar lookin’ women are WOW…
and her legs are ugly,just like Kim’s,not nicely shaped at all!
She looks great- I was getting excited because for a while there, there were only positive comments. It gets so tiring reading hateful comments. I wish I looked like her!
everything looks great but how come they never have an ass to complete their so-called “hourglass” figure???! like seriously wtf
such a let down
haha u r so right!!
I agree. Keely Brook is absolutely gorgeous and sexy, but if I had to change anything on that body it would be the butt and thighs. To match her full boobs and hips I think she needs a bigger butt and slightly fuller thighs.
I don’t like how kelly always wears bathers that sit really high up.. its very 80s. or 90s or something. just put the bathers on your undie line kinda thing