Katie Holmes: Makeup, Hair, Dress and Figure
February 4, 2009 in Katie Holmes by Versus
Reasons for posting?
1. Katie is not using any makeup when she’s spotted by the paps and she looks quite pretty with the red lipstick here. And with the ultra-shiny hair.
2. She usually doesn’t reveal much and now that we get to see some skin, she’s looking quite lean and toned, doesn’t she?
3. I’m very curious what you guys think of her dress – and I’m especially targeting the blue stuff.
2 more on the second page!
Beautiful hair and makeup, horrible dress (a bra would have been welcome here!!!).
Her face is amazing.
Please, don’t exit home without a bra! It’s just required when you go see people, you know…
Then, I would throw the blue ribbon, the sandals, and I’d make her wear a pair of stillettos, the same color as the red part of the dress.
Her hair looks really good, but she shouldn’t point the attention to her ears…. maybe some volume to the hair, or maybe some hair-strips left free to draw the attention on her face. It would be perfect!
@holly…exactly my thoughts!!!!
Where are the boobs???I don’t like her dress , it’s horrible and not flattering and she seems sad, tired and sleepy, not smiling like she used too
i know
how sad!
just cut off her head and put it n front of camera and she´ll be perfect
DD
seriously, the dress is the ugliest thing she could chose… bleww… but the face and hair- it all looks great!
I was scrolling down and saw the hair, the face, the sparkly red straps and I thought, ‘Hmm… maybe she is actually wearing something nice here.’ Then I scrolled further and saw the horrible green disaster underneath.
I have to concur with everyone else. Beautiful face and hair, I am liking her thinner. . . but the dress? Horrible.
Maybe blue sashes are the Scientology equivalent to the red kabalah wrist strings that everyone was wearing
wow ! looks great ( make up and the smile ) emmmm the dress looks very very ewwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww
she looks really good, and that lipstick suits her perfectly. She looks really sophisticated.
Contender for worst dress of 2009 and it’s only February!!
I agree with that! it’s so hideous I don’t even know why someone would chose that to wear on a red carpet!
and she look pregrant in the first pic… or is it the pose?! and she should have done something for her cleavage… it looks weird… or maybe a bra would have been welcome like Holly said
Despite my disgust with the Scientology cult and anybody falling into its clutches (weak-minded weirdos, in my opinion) I must give what little credit Scientology is due (and its male adherents) for following some of the basic precepts of the Females as Property Movement.
In many ways the females brought under the sway of Scientology ARE property.
Notice how well-behaved and deferential the Katie Holmes unit is compared to sluttish-like entities such as that Spears female or that disgusting Winehouse female failure.
If more entertainment figures followed the advice of the Females as Property Movement we would see an increase in the number of well-behaved female entertainment figures and a concurrent increase in their over-all happiness with themselves and life.
Society would also benefit as more “commoners” realized the benefit of adhering to the Females as Property Movement.
The dress is ugly, but Kate looks very glam in it… I’m loving it!
Whatever she’s doing lately, its working.
LOL @ her leaning into Tom so he looks taller… real men don’t need height to be confidant… he’s such a douche!
Obbop, a woman can be a lady without being “property”. That is a disgusting thing to say.
What does Scientology say about homosexuality? Just curious…
Catty, I know, but why does Tom’s wives get skinny after being with him for a bit?
At least the girl pulled out some color! Yeesh, it was getting a bit drab. How did they do her hair, isn’t it much shorter than that? It must be a hairpiece…
about the blue stuff….
it’s strange
Instant… great question… I think its because he’s a controlling douche. And the “women as property” movement.
Run, Katie… RUN! And take Chris Klein’s beautiful daughter with you!
Once the indoctrination/brainwashing females undergo from so many different sources from their earliest years it is surprising how large of a percentage of females actually discover true internal happiness once they live within the precepts of the Females as Property Movement.
True, a small minority of females will not experience happiness no matter what lifestyle they dwell within.
However, once relieved of the burden of attempting to dwell in our current general USA society/culture that requires females to behave in a manner inconsistent with their natural proclivities, such as attempting to adhere to the responsibilities of being a full-fledged adult that accompany the rights and privileges involved, females usually discover the happiness that eludes so many modern females.
I have noticed that most females are so well-indoctrinated that the knee-jerk responses to mention of the Females as Property Movement is indicative of an incapability to apply logical and rational thinking to a new concept, one of the many foibles that females must naturally contend with.
The topic is too complex to cover at a message board but with time and education assuredly more females will eventually overcome their indoctrination and embrace what for so many females (and males and society in general) is a path to enlightenment and personal satisfaction.
uuum my girl friends and I were NEVER and NEVER will be a property and we dooo behave much better than those u mentioned…
I thought we were supposed to comment on what Katie Holmes looked like not her religious beliefs.
Weird choice in dress but otherwise she looks stunning!
her choice of colour is nothing compared to the greasy sleazy piece of husband she has on her hand here. nice shape, nice hair, but a classic dress+ a classic gentleman would do her more justice.
her body?
long,lean, and she has a cute face:)
there is not much flaws you can discuss on her.
the dress: i wouldn’t go for it. but it seems to be part of her quirky style.
I also noticed , compared to tom, man does she look tall! how tall is she?
She’s 5′ 9″ (1.75 m)
I don’t like the dress at all, otherwise I think they both good great.
At first I was completely shocked by the dress.. I think the colors are ALL wrong and that blue thing is terrible but I think it has a lot of potential. The shape fits her, I think, because the dress is kind of nodding towards ’20s flapper dresses, and she has that boyish waif body that flappers needed. The shiny hair looks great with the look.
All in all, she’s about a 2 out of 5 star, I would say.
“Obbop, a woman can be a lady without being “property”. That is a disgusting thing to say. What does Scientology say about homosexuality? Just curious…”
I appreciate you giving credence to the Females as Property Movement. Your emotion-laden reply with the requisite female-type rhetoric spewing shows just two of an immense number of female mental defects that prevent them from filling adult roles within adult society.
Except for the very small percentage of females capable of meeting adult responsibilities it is imperative that the majority of females be curtailed for their own and society’s good.
I do not expect the typical female to comprehend that of which I write. Female emotionality blocks too much input and inhibits the processing of inputted data and what little finally escapes the clouded befuddled female brain has been excessively tainted by irrationality and emotionality.
Except for the very small percentage of females capable of meeting adult responsibilities it is imperative that the majority of females be curtailed for their own and society’s good.