Jennifer Lopez: Backless Dress and Bootylicious at the Golden Globes
January 12, 2009 in Jennifer Lopez by Versus
Let the Golden Globes Parade begin!
Remember the famous and extra cleavagey, green Versace dress Jennifer wore to the Grammies years ago? Well, this is the closest thing to it, meaning that it shows a lot of skin. Back skin, rear skin, arm skin and bust skin. A dress that would definitely look unforgiving on many, but looks pretty good on Jennifer.
A pretty sexy choice, especially since it’s also tight on Jennifer’s plump back curves!
How do you like Jennifer’s curvy hot mom body in this golden dress?
So many amazing figures, so many fabulous dresses… yet to come!
Her makeup, hair, body and everything else i perfect, but that dress is trashy and very very ugly.
I agree with Anya. Trashy. Too much skin. If you are going to do backless, don’t also do a neckline to your waist. Trying too hard.
toooooooooooo shiny!
Yes this look is a little over the top but it’s J.Lo! What would you expect?
She wanted to show that post baby body and she did it well IMO.
I don’t care if it is trashy or over the top, this lady is showing us that having babies does not equal lost hotness
Flaunt it, JLo, that’s all I have to say 
Trashy. Hate it.
Jennifer is gorgeouse. Sh´s the most beautiful woman of the world. Beter Beyonce, Rihanna, and so on! 37 years old and two childrens!… Who will be Bey and RiRi in the same circunstancies???
somebody’s proud of losing the baby weight
)
She is beautiful, but the dress might be a bit premature…she still has a few post-baby lbs to drop…or just cover up a bit more if she’s happy at her current weight….I’m just not digging the back view, it’s a bit chubby to me.
I think she looks great in this flashy dress. Trashy? Not in the least, she looks like a goddess–a fantastic apparition contemptuous of human standards of propriety. Chubby? That’s overstating the case. There may be a tiny roll of extra fat, but not much and certainly that’s better than protruding ribs.
JLO looks fabulous.
in the immortal words of Ru Paul,”Work it girl”
and thats exactly what she is and should be doing.hey she worked hard.
good for her:D!
she stunning,almost back to her prime.
she doesn’t look trashy.she looks elegant b/c of her muted make-up and jewelery. she can also pull it off b/c, if you noticed her bottom half is completely covered. and its all about proportion to pull this look off.A mjor contribution to piull this dress of his her great body and show stoping confidence. and conifedence is always sexy.
She looks HOT. I love the dress. She’s beautiful no matter what she wears.
*sp pull off the dress
msn entertainment says”Golden Globes Undressed! The Worst
Baby Got Backlash: Jennifer Lopez secured her link in the Hollywood food chain when she descended on the 2000 Grammys with then-boyfriend Puff Daddy in a sheer, slit-to-her-nether-regions Versace gown. “Those fashion moments happen by mistake,” she later told Harper’s Bazaar. “You can’t plan things like that.” But that’s exactly what she appears to be doing at the Golden Globes in an overt, mama’s-talking-so-pay-attention-to-me desperation play. J.Lo, who’s apparently forgotten that her red carpet pinnacle was three marriages, one set of twins and a formerly hot career ago, unwisely attempts to produce a new fashion moment — and reclaim her relevancy — by once again cornering the market on double-sided sticky tape. Her weapon of choice is a liquid gold Marchesa halter gown that shows off acres of skin smoother than the tushies of her tots, Max and Emme. But the shortfall of fabric on top is also painfully unforgiving from certain angles — and would be whether on a twiggy model or the spectacularly curvy Lopez, who should have dressed for her figure, not for the photographers. Perhaps her decision to don minimal coverage will turn out to be a savvy PR move that will quell rampant rumors of trouble in her union to Marc Anthony, who was glued to her side at the ceremony. Still, that strategy might have been slightly more successful if Jennifer hadn’t left her wedding ring at home. Again. (AP/Reuters) ”
do you guys agree?
@Freedom: Who ever wrote that is a hag. JLo looked great, and so what if she was trying to get some attention with that dress, she is no more guilty of that then any of the other women that dressed up for the event.
What Potato said- tiny sliver of back fat &all, I like this JLo better than the “mommy & me” one.
Hmmm… people say I look like her…
I do agree about the extreme skin…but she rocks it. So I guess its okay.
i loved her when she was in her dancing years. i bet she cud still dance but her body doesnt seem like it would be as fierce as before. i love her body. it suits her, a mother. those were her dancing years and this is her mother years. i kknow shell tone her body but u cant hide dem beautiful hips and rear.
she has a great butt
Honestly if she had been in perfect shape she could have pulled it off. It looks a tad cha cha cha because her bits are not in great shape.
jlo is beautifull no matter what she wear.
i like the dress but not the hair.
lopez is curvy as well as sexy though she do not have a beautiful face and i think she has a great butt.
mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
ass is shining in this dress. mmmmmmmmm
oh is very beauty… dresss i laik this dress to bay for myself jenifer is perfect