Gemma Atkinson in a Bikini
August 1, 2009 in Gemma Atkinson, Hot Models by Versus
She’s hot, she’s busty, she’s slim, toned and fit… and she’s in a bikini!
British glamour model Gemma Atkinson brings you today’s bikini treat!
How do you all like her bikini figure?
There’s more after the jump!
Looks amazing, as usual.
Does anyone else think she’s a bit more toned than last time she was on this site?
Gemma is so gorgeous and so perfect. I love her body, but I’d wish she didn’t have those big breasts, they do nothing for her.
But they dont look enhanced (she doesnt look like she had a boob job to me). I cant really see her face, other then when she’s squinting which doesnt really matter.
she has had a boob job. She’s an e cup now, and if I remeber correctly, she said she went from an b cup to an e cup.
if she’s had a boob job, they’re awesome. and they really DO do something for her – they get her paycheques. glamour models all have huge boobs… she probably wouldn’t have a job otherwise. lol
i don’t think she looks that great, and those big boobs look ridiculous.
Lol i can tell you’re a woman from 10 miles away…In can practically smell you from that far…
I agree.
Wow she looks good! Not too skinny, but still slim and very toned! Gorgeous!
I don’t get it, and i’m sorry if this will sound offensive, but this is just another fake boob slightly big british girl who is a model. Just from what i;ve seen posted over here, all those so called glamour models appear the same: a ruler body, with huge fake tits (who says they don’t look enhanced has probably never seen boobs, really now) and an average or ugly face, and way bigger than a usual model. What’s the deal with them?
I agree. She looks nice but I have seen more stunning girls down my local high street that are both prettier and have better bodies. Also I hate big tits, tatoos and belly piercings but that is just my personal preference.
“Slightly big”???? No, she’s not. She’s got a very nice body(albeit it is pretty straight up and down, and I prefer curvy) that’s not big at all, not even “slightly” so. And I wouldn’t call her boobs “huge”. Yea, their big, but no where near huge
Regardless of them being fake they look pretty damn good(a hell of a lot better than some other fakes I’ve seen, like Audrina Partridge’s or Pamela Anderson’s).
“and way bigger than a usual model.”
You make that seem like it’s a bad thing.
“What’s the deal with them?”
All in all, they look better than the usual model, maybe?
“(who says they don’t look enhanced has probably never seen boobs, really now)”
), and hers are very nicely done, they look more natural than fake, and being in a bikini top it makes it a bit difficult to tell. Especially with the way they don’t stay in the same exact place like a lot of other fake breasts do, they don’t move that much.
LOL I have seen boobs(even have a pair of my own
All I gotta say about your post is: right on, thank you for writing that! I agree with what you’re saying. She could have chosen smaller implants but honestly, they are some of the best I’ve seen and they hang similar to real breasts.
Uma, you are certainly entitled to your own opinion and I really respect it (and please don’t take this the wrong way), but this woman is not slightly big IMO. I really don’t understand why so many women, especially younger women(and I’m referring to women in general, not you), view curvy females as big. No, she’s not a runway model, but most women are not built to be as such. She may be ruler shaped, but she still has some flattering curves going on and she has plenty of muscle tone. IMO, the combination of curves and tone is perfect.
Now, I know many regulars on this website do not like this sort of body, but hey…everyone is different.
you took the words right out of my mouth.
I agree. Most of these British glamour models are ruler-shaped or inverted triangles with average bodies and faces with some big boobs stapled on. I think as long as you have big boobs (or can buy big boobs), you can be a glamour model. It seems to be the only qualification.
Uma… you are right on !!!!!!! So many common looking women ( no crime in itself ) are gaining model status when there are prettier women in the food market in the tofu aisle.
UMA- Brit models are hot!! im from the US and I hate the “victoria Beckham” or gisele 90 pound pre-pubescent boy look.. well, posh got the tits.. but if she didnt it would be like a muscular little boy. Lucy Pinder, Keely Hazeel, And Gemma Atkinson.. ALL brit models with beautiful faces and guys body ideal. I think Brit models are way more sexually attractive.. they are not trying to sell clothes, they sel sex.. and do it very well.
Her boobs are a little big for her body but otherwise, very nice figure! I like it!
I really don’t know who she is, but she looks very nice. Are her breasts real? I sometimes have a hard time knowing, and I thought I had seen somewhere that she had a boob job done. If they aren’t real, that was one hell of a surgeon. They don’t look ridiculous or too big for her body(she looks to have a nice broad back and shoulders, they can easily support her current breast size, and I’ve seen way larger than that on smaller framed women, and they didn’t look ridiculous).
As all the other “glamour models”, she lacks class and it shows. Those implants look hideous on her. She has this really nice and athletic figure (not much of a waist-hip ratio but that’s her body type, and it’s looking really good and fit). I think she completely ruins it with these enormous breast implants that don’t suit her frame.
The tattoos and belly piercing look tasteless to me as well.
She lacks class because she got implants, tats(that aren’t even that big), and a piercing in her belly button? And those aren’t enormous implants(look up Pandora Peaks some time, THOSE are enormous
), they actually suit her frame.
You got it all wrong. She lacks class because her job is to expose her tits and call it “modeling”.
And I absolutely don’t think the implants suit her, an E cup does look very large on someone who doesn’t have the frame for it.
Actually, her breasts probably look a lot better than most models, fake or not.
And she isn’t famous for exposing her tits, she was an actress on a soap and two soap spin-offs, and did some modelling afterwards- she got her boobs done because she lost weight and prefered bigger boobs. I’m not her biggest fan but she makes the best of what she’s got- which is a lot more than average, and I’m pretty sure you make the most of what you have so really, stop being so judgemental.
And an E cup isn’t actually that big, big breasts are more common than small breasts even on slim healthy girls.
Doesn’t have the frame for it? How does she not have the frame for it? She’s broad shouldered/back(I’ve seen a lot of naturally large women that have similar and smaller builds than hers, so I don’t see how large boobs don’t suit her, real or fake)
So she models her body, big farkin’ deal. She’s got an excellent body, I say she should do what ever the fark she wants with it, don’t see how that shows a lack of class that she chose to be a glamour model. Guess I’m just not understanding how human sexuality is wrong, but I don’t see anything bad or classless about glamour modeling. Not like she’s doing porn and what not(though I have nothing against that either, if all parties are willing and not coerced or feeling forced to do that in any way).
Her boobs are fake?! If they are, I have to commend her surgeon because they look very “soft” (as opposed to steel balls on a ribcage) and they hang very naturally.
I don’t like her body, especially the upper body part because her breasts look too large and need some more support. Maybe another bikini would make her body look better, I don’t know.
She is supersexy! Her body is slim and fit, but still soft. And I love her smile. So natural.
I’m not a fan of fake breasts, but the doctor has done a good job.
Ive got the exact same figure (same boobs too but minus the boob job) and i can’t get, why people would enhance their bust to that extent voluntarily. However I think she looks naturally big breasted, fit and happy.
The extra large boobs make her appear heavier than she is. She never should have had them, they age her too.
she is nowhere near big…jjust as i hate ppl calling toned/curvy women ‘too big’ i also hate ut when they call ultra skinnies from VS ‘curvy’! i understand that women can be thin and curvy with their waist to hip ratio…but i cant think of any VS model that actually has that! (un-airbrushed i mean)…i also cant think of any that hav a decent ass and boobs (without the paddingg and pushup), i feel like this worlds perceptions are becoming very distorted!
also, if u cover up gemmas boobs her stomach and arms are just as thin as britney in her early days and jess alba in her early days…sure gemma hhas more muscle of her legs than alba…but alba was never known for having that great legs ;o)
Why i think she is slightly big? Look at her arms. They are not toned, just big. Look at her legs. You really cannot compare them to let’s say Britnet or Jessica who have big legs but due to muscle. My legs used to look like that, and i could easily fool those who had no clue that it was muscle. It wasn’t and i hated them on myself, i can’t admire them on someone else then. I admit, her abs are kind of flat, but nothing spectacular and she has no waist. So excuse me, but that’s not curvy. I know VS models are photoshoped to look curvy, so i wasn’t comparing her to any of them from this point of view. I would never call fat someone who is plain curvy, but i will not use curvy as an euphemism for fat or big or thick either. Maybe big was the wrong word, she is thick and she is shaped like a brick. She does certainly not look like a model, highfashion or lenjerie. So why is she a model, b/c she has e cups? Wow. Sorry, i don’t like her, i don’t like that she’s pretending to be smth that she is clearly not, i don’t consider her fit or curvy, maybe average. But i was not comparing her to average looking girls. I hope i made things clearer, regarding why i said what i said.
You know, some women just can’t get a lot of muscle tone/definition, no matter what. Doesn’t mean they aren’t muscular or that they are unfit, just means they don’t show a lot of definition. I know because I’m one of them. I used to be sad that I couldn’t flex and show the cool muscle tone that others could, but then I realized something: I was just as fit and able as them, had a very good body fat %, and people found me good looking so it didn’t matter that I didn’t have a lot of muscle tone/definition. She’s pretty, has a good shape considering her body type, and looks fit and healthy. If you had legs that looked like hers, I just can’t understand why you hated them so much, they are very nice legs.
She isn’t a model! She’s known for soap acting! What’s wrong with being average, I hear some people on SvsC going on about how they’re slimmer and how you got rid of your average legs, it’s not a crime to go onto a beach looking better than most yet be average.
It’s refreshing to see someone with a great body having so much fun, yet pretty soul destroying to see her picked apart for no reason other than a reflective body dysmorphia.
READ: British glamour model Gemma Atkinson brings you today’s bikini treat! IS THAT ENOUGH? that’s what it says, that’s what i assumed to be correct. I couldn’t care less about what you asume about myself. Average is average. Not good not bad, so excuse me for liking and wanting GOOD. I personally am not satisfied with average, maybe for others it is enough, not for me.
SHES WAY ABOVE AVERAGE. Uma, why dont you send in your pic .. i bet you anything that whos hotter UMA or Gemma.. it would be a shut out, and you woudnt receive a single vote for hottest..
Great looking girl – check out the body on Amy Nuttal guys – phew all natural and rock hard
I love you gemma Atkinson I want you to be my girlfriend.
Anyone know what she is doing now? Does she still have those bangers?