Brooklyn Decker Models Lingerie
March 16, 2010 in Brooklyn Decker, Hot Models by Versus
Sports Illustrated Swimsuit Issue 2010 covergirl Brooklyn Decker is our hot model for the day – here she is, showing off her figure in a bunch of lacey (and basic) lingerie.
Brooklyn will share a cover with Crystal Renn and Alessandra Ambrosio – check them out together here!
She is 22 and 5’9”!
Sooooooooooo many after the jump!
Well, we have all seen what she really looks like. So yeah, whatever. Nice underwear though, i must say.
Mmm…I dont see anything “special” about this girl at all..I dont like her body..I mean, it´s nice, but I personally like women with a little more of a booty..
i don’t like her body either…those hips are…eww
um, offensive.
Yeah, I agree.
No revelations…
her panties are one size too small in the first pic.
I think the bras look as if they’re too big in the band as well. They’re riding up her back.
She looks terrible! Especially in the first picture! No one will buy this underwear lol She’s so disproportionate, her side love handles are wider than her hips. I can’t believe they chose her! Any average looking girl looks better(w/out photoshop too)
to say she looks terrible is way too mean … a perfect lingerie should be able to make every women look amazing in it
So I don’t think she’s the problem…
the first thing I saw was that odd love handle…or whatever it is. what body type is this?
Maybe she’s somewhat of an apple? With a largish torso and skinny legs. I don’t think she falls perfectly in to that category though. But there’s nothing extraordinary about it, lots of women have “lovehandles” (or what seems like it, even if there’s bone underneath), but then their hips go erm..straight down… And the only way they wouldn’t have those handles was if they were really skinny, bc that’s just their shape. The 1. pic is awful imo even though i think she can look great in the right angles.
totally agree!!!!
Her side love handles ARE her hips. Don’t be so ignorant, and assume everyone is built the same way. I know plenty of people whose hips are wide and HIGH, exactly like that.
She couldn’t lose those without a chainsaw.
the poor woman has noo ass what so ever.
HAHA I didnt mean to be rude in my comment but that is the sad truth!! God bless my latin booty
yes
no butt, no deal lol
Yeah, and i’m sure her successful career, admiration of her body and buckets of money does nothing to compensate for that.
For an average girl she has a lovely figure, but for a lingerie model she’s really not all that….it’s not just about the boobs ya know!
yeah it’s about the photoshop. We are such hypocrites: we say we want to see more of the REAL woman and when we do, we do nothing but b*tch. Sad
i don’t know why but she gives me a plus-size feeling
me too! and i know she isn’t maybe it’s the underwear being to small, nothing is cute about wearing clothes too small for your body…
yeah, i see what you mean by that
im not a fan of her body, her stomach and hip area seem very wide, quite strange
I cannot believe the hypocritical nature of women in general.. There is so much debate within North America over what the size of models should be, and it seems that people (women in particular) are arguing that there is no middle ground between models who are too thin or too “curvy”. Well here is a woman who has a body that represents the “in-between” and yet is still being criticized for (to quote the above), not having enough booty, being disproportionate, having love handles bigger than her hips, and being average. It seems that on average, as women and a society we will continue to nitpick flaws and argue for a perfection that truly does not exist.
I was thinking exactly the same thing.
I found it refreshing to see her because she looks healthy and relatively normal (still above average attractive, which makes sense since she’s a model, but she doesn’t seem unrealistic and artificial). So I don’t get why everyone criticizes her so much.
I’m glad I’m not alone on this one
I understand that everyone has different tastes and preferences and in no way expect everyone to like how she looks .. but with how much media and interest the model size debate has gotten lately, I would have expected this girl to get a bit more support!
ditto
I can`t agree more! She looks super great and real. I don`t recognize her from the Sports Illustrated at all, and that is so wrong… photoshopping is out of hand!
Your words are so well put jammaj that I can’t add anything to them. Nothing could be more accurate than this right here.
jammaj – you just made me stop in my tracks and think a little bit more before posting a comment. I am one that thinks magazines should add more models sizes 4 to 10 in their spreads, and I don’t know what this girl’s size is, but to me she is not a 0 nor a 2, and I was gonna say some negative remarks about her proportions, but now I’ll just say “let’s celebrate variety”.
Agreed. She looks like a 4-6 (US).
You made me stop before posting a nasty comment about how average she is. I’m one of the people that complains about not seeing average women as models. We’re just so accustomed to seeing extraordiary looking women in magazines it seems like she doesn’t belong. It is good to see some variety though.
Thank you. What you said is truth and yes I can be hypocritical too. I think she looks fit and healthy.
The underwear is pretty boring, however. And I agree with the poster who said the band is too big for her.
how bizarre!!!! nothing about this girl seems plus sized, and the fact people are mentioning it in the same breath as her is wierd to me. and i do see a booty. and boobs. and hips ( mostly the bone.) not to shabby for me.
I know, it’s funny how certain shapes like pear and apple are automatically classed as plus size.
Tbh, she doesn’t really have a butt. I think it’s just the way she’s positioning her body and some photoshopping that makes her look curvy, but she’s apple shaped.
She has some fab legs and great boobs!
BOOOOOORING.
there’s something weird about her. it’s like her back is short or i don’t know! it’s just strange. i don’t like it at all
Omg the first two pictures are awful! She has a really good and fit body and lovely hips, I love her body! but the first two pieces she’s wearing is a big No-no for a girl like her. When you got hips like that wearing underwear like that is just a really bad choice..
Oh btw for everyone commenting on how weird she looks or something, i have to agree. I think it is just the underwear she’s wearing though rather than her body! she’s got a smoking body but not all lingerie is meant for all body types.
I have nothing bad to say because I have a similar shape (very short torso)….the underwear is ugly for sure!
those first 2 pictures are really weird at her hips :S are those her love handels or what is it?
Think it’s just the way she is sticking her pelvis out.
From what I can see she has a great body and it’s nice to see somebody with a slightly different shape modeling lingerie…but the angles and the lingerie are awful, she deserves better!
I really like that they didn’t photoshop her into an hourglass when she isn’t one. I think it’s great that she is modeling lingire. Apple shapes exist too…even at size 0′s, some people will never be an hourglass. Are they not allowed to be considered sexy? What if your sister, or daughter or niece happened to be born with an apple shape? Would you tell her she is not fit to model, not fit to be considered sexy?
I mean, if hourglass is your preference, that’s fine, so is mine. But to criticize a woman for being an apple seems pointless. She’s not magically going to grow an a** or shrink her waist.
That being said, I don’t like her garments. Those granny panties…ew.
How is she an apple??! She doesn’t have the greatest hip to waist ratio, but she still does have a defined waist. Maybe I don’t understand how the shapes all look, but I thought an apple was someone with a straight or even protruding torso.
She is fairly straight up and down. Her torso is very wide and undefined, while her limbs are thin. If you look at the above photos, you realize she only has hips because of the way she is posing. And her hips are not wide so much due to bone structure, but due to muscle/fat.
Very few people fit the bill perfectly for described body shapes. But she is clearly more like an apple rather than hourglass or pear. The way she carries her weight is indicative of it.
Okay cool thanks for responding!
I agree Casey. Some people on here are morons.
She is definitely an apple shape (though I do think there is some photoshopping and posing tricks to make her look more hourglass) and there’s nothing she can do about it (like she event needs to do anything).
her body is perfect- it is good to see a non skinny nor really really plus sized model… however the face is a little.. hmmm… i dont know, but imho, she just doesnt have the ´it´ factor …
i don’t think models should have lovehandles….
She doesn’t have “love handles”. Love handles are excess fat in the midsection, “spare tire” if you will. She just has largish hips and she’s short waisted.
i think what makes these pics so “not-beautiful” is what some have mentioned before, that the underwear is not very pretty… but also, has anyone noticed the make up? especially in the first picture, it looks like someone painted a brown-orange mask on her, especially in contrast to her body… all in all it just seems so unprofessional…
It’s granny panties. Why would she model this underwear? No one under the age of 50 is probably going to wear this style.
she looks veeeeeeeeeeery different than in SI but she is very beautiful and has lovely boobs lol i’m def jealous of those!!
Yeah, I think she’s soooo boring. I don’t envy her in the least. What bizarre hips.
yes i agree her hips are strange and make her body really awkward looking.
I love my body
awful grandma-like ligerie, especially the first ones (in comparison to VSecret or other not so known brands but which have really wonderful pieces), her body looks ok to me, it’s what she’s wearing that would make even Giselle look cheap…
I’ve nothing against her, it’s refreshing to see someone with a healthy body and not stick thin doing underwear photoshoots, but I can’t help to think of a simillar photoshoot Doutzen Kroes did and how better she looked.
that lingerie is hideous. if i ever undressed for a man and exposed his eyes to lingerie like this i’d totally understand if he was not turned on!
anyway, brooklyn: i never found her face to be anything special, in fact it looks kind of gross in some of these, but i always thought her body was nice until that post of her with alessandra & crystal. it suddenly didn’t look so SI worthy in comparison to many of the other models out there. and again here, i am feeling that sentiment even more so. while there is nothing wrong with her body, the lingerie just hugs her body all wrong and is really unflattering.
Nice body! She’s very slim but extremely curvy. She’s not as thin as runway models and has a small amount of extra fat on her but it doesn’t look bad.
I really hate the criticism that she’s receiving/will receive just because she doesn’t have below 10% body fat. It’s quite unfortunate. Have some empathy people!
extremely curvy? what the…?!
Is it just me or she resembles Charilze Theron a lot in the second picture?:D
Nothing is wrong with her body my god she looks horrible here……and to be honest I don’t what happened because she looked absolutely gorgeous since SI first hired her to 2008….ever since then her looks to me have gone downhill. The lighting is horrible …..the selected lingerie she is wearing is atrocious If I had a boyfriend I’d just ditch this lingerie all together…thus her hair looks fried and her makeup looks horrible. Also she has bar rafaeli syndrome meaning you take her off the beach and they don’t know what in the hell their doing as far as poses and facial expressions….
I like her body. It’s curvy and toned. I love that she has hips!
She looks WAY older than 22 imo. I’m 22 and she looks a good 15 years older than I look….so weird.
agreed. i am about her age and i think i look my age. she looks like she is well into her late 30′s…..and not really in a good way.
Looking your age doesn’t really mean anything considering everyone ages at different rates anyway.
Oh, but to add, I hate the granny panties they gave her to wear. Not even grannies should be wearing granny panties. Burn them all.
I think it is nice that there are also apple shapes like her modeling linqerie. She does not fit into two main groups: she is not too thin and she is not curvy at all. I think it is really nice to see someone like her in the industry, though -I must admit – she might not have exactly the body type I prefer.
I don’t understand why we can bitch and moan about not having any ‘normal’ sized models, and then we can turn around and start picking a perfectly healthy-looking girl to pieces.
For goodness sake, how many lingerie model-type women do you see in lingerie stores anyway? Do they not deserve to wear it because ‘OH NO, HIPS!’ or ‘OH DEARY ME, NO ASS’. There’s no reason a model can’t be perfect, good lingerie should make all women look good in the right places.
This is a case of terrible lingerie.
My body looks a helluva lot like hers, and I’m glad that for once I don’t feel like crying because the exercise isn’t making me look better or the oat cereal I eat tastes like cardboard.
Why can’t we change what lingerie models look like? Why can’t they be all sizes?
Probably because we’ve already been brainwashed into to thinking that Alessandra and Miranda are ‘average’ bodies.
Hey Samantha! Don’t suffer any longer with bland oat cereal. I know you don’t want to load it with sugar, but honey is always a tasty and healthy alternative. I have a small bowl of oat bran cereal (soaked for 24 hrs of course) every now and then, with honey to taste. A pinch of cinammon too if you like it. ^_^
I think she has nice abs, great boobs and a relatively nice caboose, but by no means does she have love handles… I’ve seen many women like this and their hips are wide, but they don’t fit the pear/hourglass shape because their thigh bones don’t jut out. She’s very attactive, in my opinion, just not the same body type as other lingerie models.
She has a similar body type to mine – except she’s tall! I def dont have as many curves tho… only her hips remind me of my own.
awful lingerie! very-very-ugly!
nothing is wrong with her body imo. she has no cellulites, no excess fat or something. what wrong is only those ugly underwears.
i don’t think it’s her.. i think she’s wearing the wrong size panties.. look at all her pics, the panties are all way too small.. you’ll look like you have love handles no matter how toned you are if you wear panties that are too small.. she has an amazing body and she’s doesn’t have love handles.. no booty? please.. she’s got an amazing ass
i love the 3rd picture!
she looks healthy, confident & happy!
I’m not liking the panties. Not very flattering. As for Brooklyn, meh. She’s okay. I have to agree with the poster in the SI thread that she strongly resembles Kevin Bacon!
fugly underwear.
i don’t know why the modeling world seems to want plus size models to be soft and untoned. its possible to be a fuller sized woman and still have some muscle tone. look at beyonce and alicia keys before her recent weight loss.
i think she has a beautiful body.
i dont understand why everyones saying she has big hips though, because she actually has very narrow hips. and some people said shes a pear shape when im pretty sure shes an apple?
gorgeous girl though
I think she has a really nice body, but these underwear are so ugly… and like, old? But when she’s in normal, cute underwear like the seventh one down, she looks great. Everyone who’s saying average girls look better or that this girl’s ‘average’… show me average girls near you! Sometimes people on this site are ridiculous. It’s like they’ve never seen a woman’s body before unless it was Alessandra Ambrosio who’s 5’10 and wears 99 pounds OR photoshopped to death OR both. Pul-lease. This girl has a good body, and I’m sure if a guy saw her (regardless of her face, which I will admit, is nothing special) would definitely say she’s built great. Everyone who’s saying she looks horrible… take a picture of yourself in your underwear, upload it, and then we’ll talk.
/Sorry for the rant.
i dont think shes in between skinny and fat. shes just skinny and a little dispraportionate. i have the same body but with like 15 pounds on top. unfortunately i hope my body wont look like that when i lose those 15 pounds.
girls in Miami where im from have better bodies. random girls on the street. damn latin girls are blessed with perfect little figures lol. miami is so slim
shes alright but there are just so many better shaped girls out there that im surprised she got so far in modeling. it has to be her beautiful face
i THINK she might have violin deformity.
http://www.lipo-book.com/picture/upload/Image/originalbookimages/6_7.jpg
It’s really common, I have it. My hips are like that, it’s NOT love handles, they’re bones
It IS bones, and i wouldn’t call it a diformity, it doesn’t hamper her from living a full life in any way. It’s just a different body type. The same way some hips are narrow and some are wider.
she has absolutly no waist and looks like she has a muffin top in the first picture!
I don’t understand what is so ‘wrong’ about her body. Doesn’t Whitney Port have a similar body (high hips with short waist and torso)? When she had bikini photos posted on here, almost everyone loved her body.
i think the underwear just was not helping her. some shots look like her SI body…and others are different…she looks healthy and fit in all of them. i do like that she is toned and fit but not too thin for my taste….nice to see different body shapes represented. even different ones from our own ‘favs.’
they are not hips! are you kidding. that is her torso!
Those are some odd hips. Gives the impression she has love handles.
The first and second picture don’t do her justice.
That second to last picture, however, is much better.
I saw her picture in sports illustrated and omg it’s amazing what airbrushing can do. They could make Rosie O’donell to look like a model!
pancake butt…not good
she does not have a butt. like not even a little. bad photo shoot i think and not such a great model.
She’s absolutely beautiful in all these pics. what a depressing tirade of negativity in this thread.
uhmm what is with her hips they r huge for someone who is so thin. I think she would probably look better if she gained weight since her hips are so large they look freakish next to such thin arms n legs.
those arent her hips Nameunavailble
you know she looks like a normal woman! not everyone is perfect, with the love handles and hips small! she is really good looking.
Wow. I can’t get over how cruel some of these commentators are. My body is pretty much like Brooklyn’s and yes, I have zero bum and yes, my chest is rather large, and yes, I have hips that look like love handles. And I’m a real woman. Whatever that means. I work out every day. I watch what I eat. I’ve had a baby. And I look amazing. I sure hope a lot of the women/girls here gain some perspective about female bodies before they have kids of their own and end up instilling them with their own warped definitions of beauty.
I wanted to say exactly the same thing! I got offended by all those negative comments i have exactly the same body as her
waw Beauty, attractive and everyone wishes her consent, to treat her very attractive
Resolve coherent and charming and very beautiful
Who on earth designd these underwear?And what was he/she thinking? The girl is very pretty but these underwear are so…ugly!