Hayden Panettiere in a Bikini in Details Magazine
July 11, 2009 in Hayden Panettiere, Photoshop Job by Versus
Here’s Hayden Panettiere in Details magazine, showing off her beach figure: we’ve got one fit tummy and one digitally enhanced cleavage.
That sums it up!
How do you guys like this spread?
See 2 more pictures after the jump!
Source: Details Magazine
Cheap Details Magazine Subscription
I love her, but it’s a disgrace that people, who normally has a small chest, can’t be featured on a cover or in a magazine without enhanced breasts or plumped cleavage.
i agree completely.
It’s a real shame. Though I’ve also noticed that, even when the woman’s breasts are an average size, their natural cleavage is almost never good enough. It’s often inflated into an unnatural breast-implant type of cleavage. Victoria’s Secret is a great example of that! Sometimes you even see where they did one, but forgot the other and the model has one breast looking three times as large as the other!
I think Hayden is a gorgeous girl, but this looks totally airbrushed and her breasts are definitely enhanced.. a lot!!
She has been looking amazing lately!
And yeah, her breasts should have been left alone…
She always looks like she’s smirking. If I knew her IRL, I’d always be checking myself to see if she’s secretly laughing at me because I tucked my skirt into my stockings or just sat in gum.
that was funny!
))
and I agree, of course!
She looks super awkward in the first, second and fourth photo but the third one is fine because she’s not propping herself up in a weird way.
It’s just weird to me, she looks so young and posing so provacitivly… sometimes she looks a lot older but not in this shoot.
I think she looks stunning! Great body!
dang, if only we all had photoshop irl! i mean she’s gorgeous, obviously, but it kills me that they TOTALLY gave her a solid c cup cleavage and a perfect low 20-something inch waist, when in reality her chest/waist proportion is very close. i mean, i do think she has an odd body type, but i appreciate the fact that she hasn’t chosen to put plastic in her body (yet!)
oh well :/
And the message this photos are sending is: not putting plastic is wrong. Look, you should look like this. Very wrong…
haha so we agree, right?
i’m just mad that magazines always have to push for figures that are really quite rare (eg 36-24-36) when in reality women come in so many BEAUTIFUL shapes and sizes
Yes we agree. And about those sizes, not only magazines, but have you noticed how so many women – models, actrisess, whatever – who are clearly extremely different in shape and size pretend to have that flawless combo? As if beauty resides in some numbers and not in that we can all clearly see.
OMG, absolutely! i hate hate HATEEE how celebs have such fantastic (and *different*) figures, and yet somehow they all wear size 00/0/2 dresses, size 25 jeans, and weight 110 pounds. i can understand an actress saying she’s 5’5″ when she’s only 5’3 1/2″, but why do they have to be so terribly unoriginal and claim to have the “ideal” 36-24-36?
UGH i’m glad to see i’m not the only one who gets frustrated with celebs! lol
is it my imagination, or has she lost some weight ?!
I hate the bra. It ruins her cute natural look, which was one of her best features..
her stomach is totally airbrushed in the 2nd pic
The job on the enhanced cleavage tells us exactly why this magazine is “Cheap Details” magazine.
I’ll admit she has a great body, she looks very fit and not too skinny, but for some reason she annoys the hell out of me.
MIDGET TROLL
IDIOT!
TOTALLY airbrushed! how stupid do magazines think we are?! i’ve seen a photo of her in a bikini in a magazine and she has much bigger thighs and her waist isnt that thin, not sure about the boobs wasn’t even looking at that.
eurgh, disgusting.
love haden…dont u guys think it sad they mus also photo shop ppl…nuttin is wrong wid small boobs!! these magazines!!!