Cheryl Cole’s Thin Figure in Short Shorts
August 8, 2010 in General by Versus
Here’s a leggy treat for you: 27 year-old Cheryl Cole, who looks thin in a pair of short shorts, plaid and wedges.
Extra info: Cheryl Cole recently recovered from malaria and various sources say that she’s lost some weight because of the ilness. Now Magazine reports:
Celebrity nutritionist Nicki Waterman tells Now that image-conscious Cheryl, who ironically climbed Mount Kilimanjaro to raise money for Comic Relief’s anti-malaria campaign last March, needs to eat plenty of carbs. ‘She needs to be taking in at least 1,800-2,000 calories a day,’ says Nicki. ‘She’s not a big carbs fan, but she has no choice right now. It will be key in repairing her body.’
See 2 more Cheryls after the jump!
nice
Gah, she’s so pretty! Glas shes ok now. One thing, I often find her legs quite odd, because from some angles they look SO thin, and in other ones (not these) quite muscular.. Does anyone know what body type she is?
No but I need to know because I have exactly the same legs and shape as her!!
Lucky you, thats all I can say!!! Although I can sympathise with the muscular leg thing
i think her legs are thinner cause of her illness, they will be more muscular when she is touring, and also if the shots are of her on stage dancing the muscles are probably more defined then.
why the huge shoes? i really don’t like them and find such high wedges odd with a casual outfit.
Maybe she didn’t want to look too casual (as in she didn’t want to blend into the crowd)? Or she finds heels more comfortable than flat shoes. I’ve known a few women who have had that (generally due to being born with a high arch). Sometimes I wish I had that problem because I can’t buy flat shoes small enough to fit my feet where I live.
actually if there was ever a time to wear those wedges..it would be with casual outfits. Those wedges would look odd with any form of semi-formal or formal clothing.
I think she’s been referred to as an inverted triangle but honestly, from some angles she looks like a ruler. Angles and clothing can make body typing difficult sometimes.
Regardless, I think she’s stunning!
nice look.
to be frank,I wouldn’t call her ugly but when it comes to beauty or oomps she has really nothing speacial imo.She is a random nice girl to me..But nowadays people(especially guys) forgot to have their own tastes,I mean media says”this is beautiful,that is hot,the other one is worth to drool over”and bam!Guys totally agree and they suddenly start to find them hot or sexy or whatever media says..Which I call it “media push” and yet Cheryl Cole is one of those women,she is nice and cute but I would never ever choose her as the sexiest one of the world,and same idea goes for Olivia Wilde,I can understand some think she has a nice face with cat eyes,and that big jaw and a normal nose(not really my cup of tea) at least it’s a charismatic different face,but that body,those chunky legs and zero boobs and with those canckles I don’t know why she was the sexiest of last year..Of course to each his own,but I don’t find anything genuinely attractive on Cheryl..Just a simple nice girl who can dance nice..I love myself for not trusting media,lol:D
btw,her legs are a little weird to me,they are ok from the front,but from the behind it seems like there ain’t no difference between calf and thigh..
“chunky legs”??? You cant be serious
i wouldn’t say chunky but i can see what bimbo is saying there’s no definitive curve showcasing her ankle making her legs looks the same width throughout, but that by no means detracts from her overall gorgeousness.
yes I meant chunky and referred to Olivia Wilde as you can see in those photos:
http://img.skinnyvscurvy.com/2009/09/a-makeup-less-olivia-wilde-in-shorts.jpg
http://www.hotcelebfun.com/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/fbabd_olivia-wilde-may-01.jpg
http://www.skinnyvscurvy.com/olivia-wilde/olivia-wilde%E2%80%99s-red-hot-denim-look.html
to compared to the rest of her body,I woulşd say she has really thick ankles and calves..and once again,I really admire beauty I love beautiful women whcih makes me question myself on bisexuality(lol)but Olivia Wilde,I wouldn’t vote her as a sexy woman,never ever..And once again,to each his own..
I agree with most of what you are saying. I know what you mean about Cheryl’s legs – they have no shape to them. But they are very thin legs, and they’re not “chunky” as in size. If you mean ‘chunky’ as in muscular, then i know what you mean.
omi!I wasn’t referring to Cheryl when saying “chunky”:DCheryl’s legs are nice actually tough there is no difference between upper and lower they still look nice..I was talking about “media push” which I thought Cherly and Olivia are pushed by media and then I started to talk about Olivia but since this thread has nothing to do with her,it’s not really surprising for you guys to misunderstand me..Sorry for confusion!:]
I suppose Cheryl’s legs might look chunky compared to the rest of her body at times, but compared to any ‘average’ person she has completely skinny legs.
Bimbo was referring to Olivia Wilde with the ‘chunky legs’ comment. And only because there’s not much definition between ankle and calf.
I’m sorry Bimbo, you comment just comes across as poorly disguised jealousy the way your ranting on. Every one is entitled to their own opinion, sure, but the way you are rambling on it just oozes insecurity and jealousy.
huh!!Jeaolusity??Who the hell are you telling me I am jealous eventhough you don’t know jack about me??If I was jeaolus of beauty,I wouldn’t find damn hot Adriana,Emily DiDonanto,Kelly Brook,Jessica Lowndes and a lot of women!!I was just saying there ain’t nothing special in Cheryl and I feel she is overhyped by media and I think the same for Olivia that is why she was brought up! And if you are really feeling worthless and going through a menstration or what the hell you’re living through go solve it,because it’s just making me sick when these cyber people try to satisfy themselves by attacking the others so they somehow feel like”omigod,I did something,I actually talked,I told someone off,can you believe”stuffs and try to shake their pityness..I love myself and I see there are different types of beauties!I just told my opinion and if you don’t like the ideas those are different than yours,then just write your comment and quit readsing others!And yes neither Olivia nor Cheryl are special girls to me??What else to say???
Your right, Olivia wilde does have chunky legs. Like others, I thought you were talking about Cheryl Cole. Sorry. And ignore those jealousy accusations, they just cant stand it when a celeb they like isnt liked by everyone lol
I’m sorry, but I feel like this tendency to assume that people are jealous when they don’t find someone attractive is compltely bunk. There are plenty of BEAUTIFUL women that everyone compliments on this site (like Jessica Alba for instance), so why would they not be jealous of her?? It just seems to me that when people truly find someone attractive they have no problem saying it – whether they are jealous or not.
ooms=oomph:S
she looks really thin and gaunt…and her legs looks bad!hope she recovers soon
she has the worst tattoes!! kind of trashy! she is a pretty girl, I wonder if she regret those tattoes…
Damn, she is GORGEOUS. Love her body and her face. So jealous:)
She has said before she really regrets the tattoo, she still has great legs though tattoo or not. I personally love big calve muscles teamed with lean thighs, I think its nice.
She is skinny, but a firm, healthy looking skinny, not like the nasty coat hanger models. You can tell she must weight train.
Nice choice of a first photo with that odd expression. LOL
She looks like she is recovering well. If I hadn’t read about her having malaria I wouldn’t even be able to tell she had been ill. Or perhaps I am just not that perceptive in that area.
Beautiful woman. And she has great legs!!!
This is exactly the sort of thing that I wear if I want my legs to look slimmer.
A loose, short short that covers the largest part of the leg and makes the rest of the leg look smaller in comparison. Then add a heel to make the legs look longer, thinner, and toned.
1,800-2,000 calories ? big fat lie.
she probably eats about 1,300 & works out 24/7.
The dietician was saying that she NEEDS to eat about 2000 calories a day, not that she actually does. I agree with you, i doubt that Cheryl eats more than 1300, which is what a woman needs to survive WITHOUT any exra activity.
Since Cheryl is so skinny, her metabolism will be very low, so if she was eating 2000 calories a day, she would gain weight fairly quickly in a couple of months. As she got to a healthy weight, her metabolism would speed up a bit and she’d stop gaining weight from the 2000 calories. It’s the same, but in reverse, for fat people – the fatter you are, the higher your metabolism. That’s why obese people loose a lot of weight at first, then their weight loss slows down as they become lighter.
I don’t think that’s exactly true. I stopped eating for awhile, and in order to gain weight I needed to eat like 3000 cal a day. Starvation or sickness can wreck your body, so initially you need extra calories to fix your body on top of restore basic function. So you would increase calories to 2000 a day, and you would gain two pounds, and then your body would say that it still wasn’t enough, and if you didn’t increase calories consumption than you’d end up losing three pounds…..sounds messed up but that’s the way I think it goes.
She looks too skinny and muscular. She’s definitely too over hyped by the media – when she was on Pop idol, nobody batted an eyelid, there was none of this “OMG Cheryl is stunning!”, stuff. Some photos in the daily mail last week claimed that Cheryl was “completely make up free”. I later read that her make up had taken two hours (foundation, powders, highlighters, ect), she was wearing £80 designer false eyelashes and she’d had a £40 salon blow dry. I mean, she isn’t ugly, but neither are most young women. I don’t think her features are anything special – she has quite a pointy nose, with a hump on it. (Look at un- air brushed side profile pictures of her, and pics before she was famous). The make up artists do a great job of contouring it.
I would call people like Halle Berry, Keira Knightley and Zooey Deschanel stunning, but Cheryl is just ok. She’s just your typical chav, common as they come, who got lucky.
dude…h8 much?
Blah blah blah jealous hater. There are plenty of videos of her without make up and she looks nothing short of stunning.
To each it’s own taste… just because u don’t find Cheryl special doesn’t mean ur jealous… Maybe Shell thinks Bar Rafaeli (??) is gorgeous, and is jealous of her, but can still admit that she’s beautiful…
Like Mizzy wrote earlier: stop assuming people are jealous when they don’t like the same celeb u do!
Umm she has a great body!
I agree that she isn’t stunning in anyway, I think pretty is the best word to describe her. Its like oatmeal for breakfast, meh.
umm more like oatmeal mixed with tons of yummy berries and milk! haha my fave breakfast food actually.
I agree with you! She looks really nice in some pictures but she also looks really manufactured, like she’s wearing a lot of make up, fake lashes etc. In most pictures she looks ok but to me she’s not fantastic. I think most people find her so gorgeous is because nothing is ‘wrong’ with her ie. there is nothing unusual to her look that some people may find unattractive.
cheryl cole no make up on top of a mountain
http://www.cherylcolefan.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/cheryl-cole-kilimanjaro-climb-day5-post.jpg
manufactured?
She is beautiful. I love her legs and face!
Isn’t it a little scary to think how many of us are admiring her body which is the result of MALARIA!!! I guess most women wouldn’t mind having malaria if it meant losing a lot of weight and looking like this. It reminds me Emily Blunt’s character in the devil wears prada when she says she is one stomache flu away from her goal weight. Cheryl Cole is clearly not healthy, by definition, she just spent a month in the hospital followed up by almost a month of bed rest – how is that healthy?? And, you really have to wonder whether her immune system was already weak because she was underweight to begin with.
I know, I was just thinking, “damn, I need to get malaria!”. It’s so messed up lol. I’m sure nobody would really want malaria but she does look good.
I see this woman very nice and simple and sexy at the same time.I like the way she keeps on going after all she been trough,with her husband cheating scandals twice and the malaria.She`s a very strong person(her character).Love her legs,her hair and the make up she always do
One of the many reasons I avoid third world countries is the threat of disease. Last time I went to a third world country I lost almost 10 pounds in two weeks. I won’t go into specifics but I will never travel to such places EVER again.
i hate to call you out on your sheer ignorance BUT no, not all “third world countries” pose a threat to health. Firstly It depends on WHAT part you visit/live in. Obviously if it was the same living condition (i.e. still water, lack of amenities e.t.c) in a first world country (i.e. some really bad part in the projects in your so called “first world country”) there is a huge chance you will also fall sick (via lack of sanitation). Secondly, it depends on the health of your body before you visited the so called third world country and how you took care of yourself before. LMAO at “i will never travel to such places EVER again”. Please don’t. I am positive they won’t miss you. Stop with the gross generalizations, I am sure you are one of those people who refer to the whole continent of Africa as a country. SMH. Sorry if I am being rude, just hypersensitive to ignorant BS.
Fine, live in denial. Here: http://www.globalissues.org/article/218/diseases-ignored-global-killers
Quotes: Many people, most of them in tropical countries of the Third World, die of preventable, curable diseases.… Malaria, tuberculosis, acute lower-respiratory infections—in 1998, these claimed 6.1 million lives.
# Someone in the world is newly infected with TB bacilli every second.
# Overall, one-third of the world’s population is currently infected with the TB bacillus.
Girl please. Read your comment. You generalized and was completely offensive. I “high-five” chillwaves for everything she said to you. Statistics are not life. I dont listen to them. I’m from a “third world country” (hate that saying) and am completely healthy, even with those stupid statistics and article. Thanks ; )
lmao at “live in denial”…I just can’t. not worth it.
While your stats may prove to be accurate, you are still generalizing about third world countries. It’s like saying that the United States is an obese country, even though many people in that country are at a healthy weight. People get offended by these generalizations. You have proved your point: you will not visit third world countries. Good for you.
Wow. I am from a third world country and I have to say your comment is pretty offensive. We live in the third world, not the 1600s and many third world countries take many steps to avoid diseases. I have never had malaria or any serious illness as a result of the environment and neither have most of my friends. How would you like it if I visited your country and because of one bad experience generalized about all first world countries?
Some more quotes: “Eleven million people in poor countries will die from infectious diseases this year. Put a different way, it means that by the time you finish reading this column 100 people will have died. Half of them will be children aged under five.”
“Annual economic growth in countries with high malaria transmission has historically been lower than in countries without malaria. Economists believe that malaria is responsible for a “growth penalty” of up to 1.3% per year in some African countries.”
and your “quotes” are suppose to proof or establish what? that every acre and square inch of every third world country is disease ridden? once again, you singlehandedly confirmed your ignorance. Um out *drops mic, shakes head and walks away*
Listen, it’s your responsibility, when going to *any* foreign country, to get the necessary vaccines, and prepare yourself for the rules that exist there.
If you couldn’t do that, it’s not the country’s fault. It’s you for assuming every place on the planet has the same germs as your own.
Because you can say the SAME thing about MANY first-world countries. take Australia for example. If someone is an idiot and doesn’t learn about the various poisonous fish and sealife, and or gets bit by a spider and doens’t know to go and get a vaccine…- does that mean they’re the idiots for not taking precautions, or that the country is effed up?
And to top off, the only reason why malaria exists in 3rd world countries, isn’t because they’re poor. It’s because that’s where the spreading agents for the disease exist. If the mosquido in question was native to America, americans would be getting their yearly malaria on top of their yearly flu.
I’m really glad that you, as well as other people, have spoken out against these generalizations. As I said before I am from a third world country, but I have been studying in the UK for almost 4 years now. Before I came here, there was a list of vaccinations I had to get because my body wasn’t used to certain conditions. And that’s the UK, by most people’s standards it isn’t a ‘dangerous’ country for illness.
It’s true that some third world countries are plagued by impoverishment or disease epidemics; but there are many developing countries who have taken steps towards medical advancement and the prevention of disease.
Also I can’t help noticing that the statistic jenP quoted came from 1998, it isn’t even a current fact.
I can’t stand her, and sure she’s pretty but a long way from being even close to the most beautiful. Boohoo, your husband cheated on you is that supposed to make us forget that you attacked someone because of their race? What a twat.
if i were her id try not to put the weight back on…she looks better
she’s hot
Her face looks weird in the first pic, but she looks pretty happy with herself
Most women hate Cheryl, which is out of pure jealousy.
Kimberley Walsh’s legs are 5 times the size of Chery’s
yet the “real women brigade” love Kimberley.
Cheryl is gorgeous, and she is natually pretty. Look at her
on that show before she was famous. Naturally stunning girl.
Ugh, the pathetically flawed ‘jealous’ argument. Just because someone doesn’t like the same things as you doesn’t make them envious. I don’t think Cheryl is remotely attractive. To me she just looks manufactured and cheap. Give me Jennifer Connelly, Clemence Posey or Diane Kruger anyday. For me, they are examples of natural and graceful beauty.
I don’t consider Cheryl Cole gorgeous and not because I’m jealous, but because I have a different idea of beauty than you do.
I actually heard the opposite and that she had gained weight because she had to eat a lot to get her strength up it was said she put on a stone. Which it does not look like in these pics, in other pics of her it looks as though she has put on maybe half a stone. I don’t know why everyone goes on about her legs so much, I think a lot of the time people are looking for flaws in someone who lets face it doesn’t have many. She’s got a great face, a nice body. The one downside is that she does have the fake hair, the fake eyelashes, the veneers to help her along. All that aside though, most celebs do and she still manages to stand out.
I don’t see where she lost weight, sorry, seems the same as before to me….
And I never liked her stumpy legs. The knee is too thick and she has cankles.
Great great great great legs!
I think she looks beautiful and I love her outfit. Hate her trashy thigh tattoo IMO. Don’t think she looks too skinny here, but any skinnier than this and she’d be looking too thin.
I hae leg like cheryl and hate them because they are ove musly no matter how thin I getI cant gt rid of them.
LOL you picked the worst pictures instead of about 200 stunning photos.
Cheryl is stunning with or without make up and I’m glad she hasn’t felt the need to get surgery apart from her teeth. Weight looks healthy.
Is she doing a chipmunk impression in the first pic?!??