Emma Watson Is Wearing Daisy Dukes, Too
September 6, 2009 in Emma Watson by Versus
After Hayden was kind enough to reveal her thighs in a pair of daisy dukes in the previous post, here is Emma Watsojn doing the same thing… plus a few more inches.
She’s cute, she’s slim and she looks healthy!
So what do you guys think of her legs?
She has very loveley legs, they don’t look even the slightest bit flabby or fake-tanned to the extreme.
My problem here is that they were obviously photoshopped out of the Elle UK photo shoot, and I’m wondering when stupidity like that is going to stop.
I don’t think they photoshopped her so much. I have similar legs to this pic, and I can make mine look several inches thinner just by posing in a certain way and taking the photo from slightly above my midline.
Notice how these pics are from below (this has a widening effect) and she’s sitting relaxed.
great legs…
beautiful pale legs
OMG hermione is so hot! LOL i was always a fan, and she looks very healthy-not too thin or overweight in the least.
I think she has poorly shaped legs…. ankles, knees and calfs too puffy and thighs have no definition…. but for a girl next door they are pleasant legs.
you insane? Geez, some people seem to be perfectionists…
I know! I mean the nerve of her strutting around as though her legs were not necessary shapely but still lean and nice looking. Did she even look in the catalogue before purchasing? Clearly those that have eyes will have good legs….
She has great legs. The photo on the right really shows the muscle.
good legs.. my little brother is beyond obsessed with this chick, she certainly has her moments, but I dont find her spectacular
I hate the shorts
xShe’s so cute! The outfits are really classy looking! I like her legs, they’re a good sight better then mine. :]]
she has cankles. ugly legs.
Just because she still has muscle and sinew not eaten away by anorexia on her ankles, does not mean she has cankles.
I mean, I’m all for opinions, but you can clearly see a shapely curve of her calfs thinning downwards. It’s not an extreme one, but it’s there.
That slight curve cannot overcome the shapeless, sexless, wanna be legs
How are they shapeless? I can see shapes. Muscle definition, curvy thighs and calves – shapes. If this is shapeless, how do you call the gagillion skinny-fat coke-sniffing, and binge drinking actresses out there. I suppose shapely, right?
You’ve got issues.
I love your poetic description. Touche !! But…. yes I do prefer the look of the skinny runway model.
i cant believe people are beating on her legs. she looks healthy and happy with herself. seriously guys, for all we know some of us probably have “not as nice” legs as she does.
im so glad to not have grown up under the spotlight or else my self esteem would probably be beaten down to a pulp.
Comes with the territory….. wanna be famous,,,, you are now under more scrutiny.
This girl is so intelligent, I admire her sense of fashion and also her cold blood with all what happened in her life. Anyway, she’s got nice meaty/healthy legs, so thumbs up for Emma
This girl is so plain. I don’t have anything against her, but she’s not the one who pays attention to herself.
She’s cute! Although, as someone said previously, her legs do look a lot bigger than in that Elle photo-shoot a few weeks ago. Not that it’s a bad thing! It just shows the power of photoshop and the media’s obsession with it. I think she looks great, she looks really healthy and has a nice attainable figure.
I read somewhere that she’s really into hockey, so she has great strong legs. Good for her!
I’m so sick of all these stick-thin Hollywood actresses. I mean, if you’re naturally that thin, that’s fine. But if you’re not, it’s not beautiful to force yourself down to a weight where you are unhealthy.
You should try to take a picture of yourself from the ground line. Then a picture of yourself in heels from eye level. 50$ that your legs will look a lot thicker and weird looking in the first pic.
I’m sure that’s definitely a huge factor in it too, but I mean… they photoshop EVERYONE. Why would Emma be the exception?
I know lots of guys who are obsessed with her. Granted, they’re 16 years old, but still she’s got something else going for her besides the tone of her legs. She’s gorgeous.
Emma wears high heels a lot which make her legs look very slim, so when she is in flats, her legs can look a bit undefined. Also this is a terrible angle for legs. Either way, they are still lovely and so is she
OMG I thought she was Kirstin Stewart at first. Same face, body and style. She’s rather plain but there is nothing wrong with that.
I think you should get your eyes checked o_O
She’s a cutie.
i cannot see any of the pics!!! Why???
She clearly is a schoolgirl who enjoys playing hockey and other games, doesn’t overeat and enjoys herself. For someone who’s had the world and his wife studying her through puberty she’s looking jolly good!
Her legs are totally thin but look healthy. And they may look bigger because of the light and shadows in the second picture and because she is in motion in the first.
I agree that Emma has a nice body for the ‘girl next door.’ She certainly doesn’t need to lose any more. If anything, she could tone up a little bit more but that’s it. I think she’s got the perfect balance. I can’t call her fat nor can I call her too skinny.