Christina Hendricks – Curves in a Black Dress
March 9, 2010 in Christina Hendricks by Versus
Busty MadMen hottie Christina Hendricks (34) showed up at Elton John’s party the other day in a dress that was 3/4 skin-tight-figure-hugging-lingerie-like and 1/4 puffy-bubble-like.
Still showing off those famous upper curves!
See 2 more on the next page!
I normally like her, and she usually dresses well for her body type, but this I didn’t like. Looks like she’s squeezed into a dress one size to small for her…
nice face and complexion
but why must she get her boobs fully out!
i know they’re big but she draws attention to then and i swear it makes her look bigger than she is
i mean she has quite a defined waist and small arms
I was actually going to say I’m happy she didn’t feel the need to wear an ultrapush up with this dress, like she usually does.
I think her breasts look fine here. They exist, she can’t really hide them…there’s no other place for them to go. And covering them completely would just draw out comments like “she’s fat.”
yeh your right
i guess i was a bit harsh
i just tend to prefer a different figure
Oh I didn’t think you were being harsh at all. I just wanted to say that I do think she is dressing her cleavage better than usual.
I like the dress until it reaches the puffy bit at the end
This just made her legs looks short and stubby. And as another poster said; Why the boobs in your face ALL THE TIME? Come on! You have boobs, we get it!
Definitely the worst I’ve seen her wear, it’s making her look very short and chubby.
Love her face in the last pic though.
In the last pic I think she looks a bit like Rose Mc Gowan (only face, not body ^^)
I think she looks gorgeous. Black is definitely her colour!
I thing the colour is really forest green
yep
its forest green or darker
not black
Poor boobs. They must be in pain from being constantly squashed by far too small dresses.
I really want to see this girl in a candid bikini shot, ie without the corsets and other shape control undergarments.
Then check out these posts:
http://www.skinnyvscurvy.com/christina-hendricks/mad-mens-christina-hendricks-jeans.html
http://www.skinnyvscurvy.com/take-a-guess/knock-knock-whos-there-95.html
I don’t think she looks good in this dress, if it was longer, or shorter, would have been OK, but definitely not the way it is at the moment. Makes her look fat, big hips and short legs. Black is definitely her colour though.
How old is she?
I wrote in the post – 34.
r the boobs real=
what dress/pant size do you guys think she wears?
She is gorgeous. The bottom of the dress makes her look short, but her face and hair look angelic!
That is one ugly unflattering dress. A size or two too small as well. They dress her way better in Mad Men, she has some sexy-classy outfits there, not sexy-my boobs are all over the place.
she has a wonderful figure but the dress is too tight looking, it even makes my eyes hurt, lol but she has worn better
I’m seeing my mom here.
Yeah, I’m seeing your mom too.
My boobs are about the same size as hers and whenever i wear a dress that is very fitting my boobs seem to have a mind of their own, they insist moving up and squashing together, i feel sorry for her because it is really embarrassing and uncomfortable
CUT the puffy end!
so unflatttering
That dress is heinous.
You know something that I really hate?
I hate when everybody says to me: “What’s the matter if you’re chubby or overweight? You have a pretty face”.
THAT’S JUST STUPID
Okay.
But no one has said that here, so, your point?
You’re absolute right, Remy. That’s just as stupid as tolerating a butterface.
“Oh, who cares if she was mauled by a tiger, burned and disfigured on 95% of her body in a volcano accident, and dismembered. Her remaining eyeball is is a pretty shade of purple.”
or
“That pile vomit looks good because there’s a diamond ring in it.”
You people are idiots. Beauty involves a complete evaluation. You can admit that parts of her are beautiful, but saying “who cares”…wtf is that all about?? Maybe you’re fine with chubber, but you’re admitting that you would prefer non-chub.
Haters!
She is all woman. She is winning every woman title on the planet these days. Im glad finally megan fox has some competition.
Oh please. Do people honestly have bad taste, or do they simply go with what the media tells them looks good? Hendricks has terrible proportions (look at those stubby legs), a wrecking ball ass that could claims an inordinate amount of attention for itself and via which she awkwardly swivels around throughout the show, and she’s way too voluptuous. Voluptuousness is not sexy, it’s not elegant. In fact, her body reminds me of the cheap Parisian prostitutes that would harass me at Place Pigalle and on la rue Saint-Denis. I think those fools at Esquire must has some tit fetish, because her knobs are indeed quiet enormous, at least in that dress. But they too must have been offended by the ass, as you can tell that the cover photo in that particular issue contain a digitally reduced ass. If only it were like that in real life.
Her face, on the other hand, does not offend me. In fact, It’s quite pleasant to look at. In fact, to tone down by otherwise scathing assessment, I find most of her from the wait up acceptable (those breasts are still too large. But waist down, and you have a disaster. I wouldn’t comment just like that, but you know what, it was YOU, you and Esquire who started making assertions about her appearance. So don’t go and criticize me for speaking opening and frankly, because that would be sheer hypocrisy.
Now, her
Oh please. Do people honestly have bad taste, or do they simply go with what the media tells them looks good? All you commenting sound like those airheads on E! that parrot the current manufactured statements made by, oh, E!. Hendricks has terrible proportions (look at those stubby legs), a wrecking ball ass that could claims an inordinate amount of attention for itself and via which she awkwardly swivels around throughout the show, and she’s way too voluptuous. Voluptuousness is not sexy, it’s not elegant. In fact, her body reminds me of the cheap Parisian prostitutes that would harass me at Place Pigalle and on la rue Saint-Denis. I think those fools at Esquire must has some tit fetish, because her knobs are indeed quiet enormous, at least in that dress. But they too must have been offended by the ass, as you can tell that the cover photo in that particular issue contain a digitally reduced ass. If only it were like that in real life.
Her face, on the other hand, does not offend me. In fact, It’s quite pleasant to look at. In fact, to tone down by otherwise scathing assessment, I find most of her from the wait up acceptable (those breasts are still too large. But waist down, and you have a disaster. I wouldn’t comment just like that, but you know what, it was YOU, you and Esquire who started making assertions about her appearance. So don’t go and criticize me for speaking opening and frankly, because that would be sheer hypocrisy.