Is Christina Hendricks 154 Pounds at 5’8”?
February 22, 2012 in Celebrity Quotes, Celebrity Weight & Measurements, Christina Hendricks by Versus
Many of you love celebrity weight stories (with accurate or not really numbers), so here’s one: Christina Hendricks is allegedly 11 stone / 154 lbs / 70 kg at 5’8” / 172cm (putting her in the healthy weight BMI range) and wears a UK size 14. Let’s see the details from The Mirror:
Size: At 5ft 8in tall and weighing 11st, Christina is a UK size 14 and those famous curves reportedly measure 38DD-32-38. But when she started modeling straight out of high school, “I’d done ballet for years and was tiny then, a size 4 [UK size 8], so I didn’t have any problems about conforming to a certain body type. As you get older your body changes. I’ve tried to embrace how I look at every stage.”
Gaining weight: “When I was working in Italy I was having cappuccinos every day. I’d take my clothes off in front of the mirror and be like, ‘Oh, I look like a woman.’ I felt beautiful and I never tried to lose it ’cos I loved it. I was 20lb lighter than I am now, but modelling agencies used to tell me to lose 10, 15, 20lb. I’d be like ‘That’s bone – I can’t. That’s not going anywhere!’”
Must share your thoughts!
To see pictures of Christina in a swimsuit, click here!
Check out more pictures of Christina from different occasions on the second page!
Sorry, but no.way. Just no way.
I agree. I honestly look just like her and at 5’7” (also a size 14 UK / 42 EU / 10 US) I am 183 pounds. She does look less toned than me though.
I dont know, it’s hard. It depends a lot on her build and her musculature.
If she’s small to medium boned, and not very muscular at all, she could be around 160.
People constantly underguess my weight – at 5’9″, I’m around 160, very mucular and medium build, and people guess at 130-135. That’s 30lbs off. Makes for a fun trip to the amusement parks for the “guess your weight” (I always win the teddy bear
You know what? Seeing the pictures of her further down, yeah I can actually start to believe it. The other girl from mad men isn’t that much smaller than her in the waist, and she doesn’t have ENORMOUS thighs in the picture of her with the checked pants.
One complaint: I hate how she SQUASHES her breasts together. Can she not get a better fit from dresses that doesn’t crush them up and against her neck?
38 inches is a U.K size 10!!! This is a complete lie. 42 inches is U.K is a 14.
In my honest opinion I think she is a size 16 U.K on her hips.
I have to agree with you there… I’m 5’7″ and am 170– I can’t see that at all. In fact, when I was 154 (before I got pregnant) I looked miniscule compared to her. Granted, I have a very flat chest, but even if you lobe those twins off, she still seems much larger than 154. I’d say they’re goofing the numbers by about 10-12 lbs.
I’m 5’8″ and 150. My boobs are smaller (I’m a 36 C) but I don’t look that different from her (except I have smaller hips and I’m high waisted).
I’m so bad at predicting people’s weight, hell I don’t even know how much I weigh except that I’m quite slim. However, don’t these stats sound somewhat accurate for Christina? Maybe I’m wrong. :s
I agree.
My estimate is at least 180 lbs.
I think it’s awesome to embrace your curves, but don’t lie about it then. I mean who cares the number of her weight. I’m 5’3 and 135 pounds but i’m all muscle and heavy bone, my trainer told me i was overweight before we met after hearing those numbers. Then we met and she was like oh, heavy bones and muscle. WHO CARES, she looks curvy and bodacious, just leave the number out. But on a side note, if she is 154 pounds, then her bones must be made out of air, i was 150 at my heaviest, and had a third of her boobs and waist.
I AGREE. She is beautiful with a sexy body, but there is no way (and no reason for her to pretend) that she is 150 lbs.
I totally believe that she is 154.
Whenever celebs are said to be certain stats I hop over to Mybodygallery and see if it’s plausible.
In christinas case, there are slimmer figures at 154 and 5’8 and bigger figures, like hers. So it’s plausible:
http://www.mybodygallery.com/search.html?height=5+8&weight=150&pant=any&shirt=any&zphoto=Large&new=1
Ginx, only if she never lifted a weight in her life…
She doesn’t look flabby and untoned like the women on that site that are bigger.
I agree as well. At one point, I was 5’6 150 pounds and I was way smaller than her, fitting in US size 4/5 jeans.
it’s funny how weight/shape and clothing size can be so varied. I’m 5’11″ and weigh around 140-145 now and can’t fit size 4/5 jeans…i’m a 6/7 or sometimes even a 8/9 depending on the cut (usually in really skinny jeans with no stretch which i tend to avoid anyways).
I’m not sure about her weight, but my hips are 36-37 inches and I wear a size 0/2 in pants! I’m 5’0 and 103 pounds, no way her hips are close to a similar size as mine.
I’m not sure how accurate hip measurements are in determining pants size in general. I know so many people with a hip measurement that says they’re supposed to wear one size but they wear a completely different one. Anyways I’m not sold on CH’s measurements…but that’s pretty much because I think they pull these things out of the air for a lot of celebs and they don’t take into account weight fluctuations.
Yeah, I know,apparently my pant size says I’m supposed to have 34-35 inch hips, but my hips are 36-37 inches.
Clare- I know body shapes/proportions differ, but I find that a little odd, since the usual waist & hip measurements for a 0 are 23 and 33 inches, and 24 and 34 for a 1/2. My hips are also around 37 inches and I think the smallest I could fit into would probably be a 7/8- perhaps you have a very tiny waist?
I do have 23/24 inch waist ,but a 7/8 would be way to large. A 3/5 is the biggest I can fit in. I am usually a 1 but I can fit into a 0 with stretch. I do tend to go for stretchy pants because I’m curvy. I lookes up the hip measuremnet for a jean brand I buy at nordstrom and the measurement for a 1 is 35 and for 0 its 34. Since they are stretchy sometimes I even go for a 0. Some pants I have in size one from pacsun show my crack lol because they are really stiff denim. Maybe my hips are closer to 36 inches.
Being short also might have something to do with it. I still look small next to people who are bigger sizes.
ya. I believe you. My sister and I pretty much have the same hip measurement 38-39 but I’m a 4 and she is a 10. It has to do with how the weight is distributed and also the waist measurement. My waist a lot smaller than hers and my hip size is due to having a large butt. My sisters hip measurement is evenly distributed.
thats what I was thinking!! my hips are 38 and i am 5 8′ and I wear a size 2-4 depending on brand.. noooo way is she 38 inches and wears a 14
And 38-DD ??? She looks like she has F or G cups! I just hate when celebrities lie like that… They should rather keep their mouth shut…
It most likely isnt a lie but a very uninformed guess by the media . NO WAY is she a 38 band, or a DD cup. its made up statistics like these that contribute to women wearing bras with far too big a band and far too small a cup.
I think 34FF might be more on the money!
I’m a 30FF, 5’7 and 155 pounds. I think her boobs are waay bigger! My guess is 32G/H. Her back is quite narrow.
http://www.mybodygallery.com/photos-3631-body-shape.htm#img
(This is me btw)
Wow Ninian you’re bloody hot! Nice curves!
i would guess that she is about 175.
Actually 5’8 and 150 something is about right. Why did you think less?
Completely agree. She has a very similar body to my older sister. They have the same size boobs also and she is 5’4 and almost 160lbs and a size 10. It just doesn’t add up. I have 36/37 inch hips and I comfortably fit in a size 2/4 so thats a little weird also.
no freaking waaayy
I don’t believe this either. If she’s 5’8 then she’s heavier than 70kilos.
100% agreed. Compare it to these: http://www.mybodygallery.com/search.html?height=5+8&weight=150&pant=any&shirt=any&zphoto=Large&hourglass=1&new=1
That’s what 5’8″ 150something looks like.
She is not just 154 pounds. She is in the overweight range, but that’s ok, cause she has a fortunate shape and carries it well. It’s not like she’s obese or carries a big fat, unhealthy gut.
she can’t be 71 kg..and I don’t get all the fuss about her..she is not that hot, if she’s flat as board no one would ever mention her
I’ve never understood this argument… her breasts are part of her body! Saying nobody would notice her without them is like saying nobody would notice Candice without her WHR or Adriana without her legs, etc. etc.
i am a lot shorter so i don’t know what that weight looks like on someone her height. i don’t think it sounds too far fetched though because i have never seen her in person and her chest could just be making her appear larger in photos. if she has a small frame 154 will look larger on her. it doesnt seem like she has an athletic structure with muscle that would look toned and trim at that weight and height
I agree. In the pictures where her boobs aren’t popping out she doesn’t look too big. So I think you are right that her chest makes her look larger.
Yup, this
I agree. If she is small boned, 154 lbs is going to make her look much bigger/heavier.
i am bad at guessing weight also, all i know is her chest must weigh a lot. that would give me such bad back pain
I don’t know about 154 and I am 5 foot 9 and weigh 151 pounds. We looked similar when I was in the 170′s.
Actually I beleive that is probably acurate, I’ve gained ten this pounds this winter I’m 142 and 5 ft 8 – and I have an hourglass figure and I would say I look about a stone smaller than her. So I have been thinking of her in my don’t freak out to much about the weight gain moments as I think she looks great. The camera adds ten pounds remember, if she was much abouve 152 she would look more ‘chubby, fat or w/e’ but she doesn’t she just looks curvy and still retains a slimness about her because of her height and the fact she obviously isn’t overweight.
does the camera actually add 10 lbs? i’ve always wondered if that’s true or not
it does for me. I look heavier in pictures because of my v-shape build but when people meet me in real life they are usually quite surprised that I am quite petite and tiny. Although some people are just not that photogenic because of body shapes. I have noticed my pear shaped friends take the best pictures because they look so lean up top and even if they are a good 40 pounds heavier than me, they manage to look smaller in photos.
me too.. i’m short (5’3) with big boobs for my frame, and i look like snooki pre-weightloss in pictures
(minus the orange skin, mind you)
There’s some useful information for u!! I could care less how much she weighs!! I do luv her hair color against her porcelain skin, so pretty.
I don’t know about her weight but she looks awesome in the pic with the green purse. Awesome in a casual, sweet way. I wish she’d dress in a flattering way more often.
It’s so hard to tell weight. I think she is probably at least close to this, but regardless she doesn’t look unhealthy at all to me.
no way! This is quite funny, when my hips were 38inches I looked absolutely nothing like her, their guess is so low it’s amusing!
Dear god.. the next photoshopped-to-death ‘star’ that tells to ‘embrace how you look’ or bring up the lame ‘I used to be skinny but now i am a WOMAN’ line I will honestly shoot myself.
Does the whole of hollywood have the same stanard lines? I bet they do. nice and cheap. Annoying bunch of hypocrites.
i believe her, why would she lied, shes already a tv star and a sex symbol
Ya you’re right, no one in Hollywood lies. It’s beyond the realm of possibility. And she’s only a sex symbol to overweight frumpy housewives.
Once again Anastasia you hit the nail on the head.
Agree 100 per cent.
Really? That’s her ONLY target demographic? And you know this how?
Not only people in Hollywood lie, apparently….
haha I’m not lying, that’s where her main support comes from, visit other forums and you’ll see.
Yeah especially the daily mail.
yeah maybe she lied about what 2-5 pounds, who cares? shes is obviously under pressure, no designer lend her a proper dress, no wonder her boobs are popping out of her dress..queen latifah is fatter than her and jet she finds herself a decent dress to look nice.its all because of boobs.some women and designers just hate women with boobs, thats right, but you know what, men love them. women can be such a b*tches sometimes and that shure showes on this site.you comfort yourself that boobs are disquasting because you will never have them and they are the symbol of sexy. marilynn, sophia loren, scarlett, jane maynsfield..just name them..and monica belucci..oh just look that movie “Malena”, it tells the whole truth about women jealousy and envy.that woman are sex simbols for men because of their curves.audrey hepburn is a pretty woman,she can be cute and nice,but she can never be a sex symbol.thats the truth, you like it or not. and btw im not frumpy or overweight or housewife and i love to see curves.full stop.
Your esteem really seems to survive on boobs… But, please, don’t ridicule men women eroticism Audrey Hepburn and all the sex symbols you mentioned in just one comment. I wouldn’t like to know you sexually, that’s for sure, even if you’re a quadruple Z. I guess no one told you but desire dies very easily, specially when boobs open their mouths.
yuck, and i am not here to know annybody sexually, i have a boyfriend and im straight, but thats not important annyway, im here to comment a post about christina h. and i express my thoughts on all this negativity about her and women with curves which i noticed here.you can say you dont like her boobs but to say its disquasting is just b*tchy and its not true.
That’s a nice little sermon there. I can only conclude that the only thing you have going for you is a gigantic rack, which is why you’ve been whining about boobs on every single post on here. Anyways, I have a D cup, so no jealousy, sorry to disappoint. But, if you think all you need to be sexy is big boobs you’re completely delusional (which u clearly are). There is a big difference between big boobs, and the gargantuan rack on Christina Hendricks genius.
no, boobs are nice to have but boobs are not the only thing you need to be a sexsymbol. you will need a waist too, a lots of confidence, you have to go out and make something of your life and not be frustrated, and then you need to be a nice person.b*tches are not sexy.
I know plenty of sexy b*itches, so your comment as usual is not true.
oh arent you lucky
true
and stupid old guys
I’m not an overweight, frumpy housewife and I have to say she’s a sex symbol to me, but mostly from the show.
Especially in the early episodes, the way she moves around the office with fluid grace and absolute confidence, sharking around the desks so haughty, commanding, and merciless and later developing into so human a character. I’m sorry, but that’s just sexy.
Her figure is so voluptuous: big thighs, big buttocks, defined waist, big breasts, big arms: all soft, but with a faintly masculine turn to the face that adds strength of character. And with a marble complexion to boot, she’s a Minoan goddess!
So, say what you want about her, but recognize that there are a lot of men for whom this body is an ideal, and many more for whom a woman with any body type, but lots of body confidence, is the ideal.
Would those measurements mean she is not an hourglass? Her waist is not 10 inches less than hips/ bust…
I am 5’7 and slim and weigh 140…158? Not likely.
thats why she is so hot because she carry that killos in the right places!
The way she pushes up those breasts of hers….does that hurt? It looks awfully painful.
I’m going to guess they went a little under on the bra size. Those puppies MUST be at least an F. My bra size is 32DDD/E and she’s bigger. I also say I’m a DD because it sounds a little less ridiculous than E. So we all fib. I can’t speculate on her weight though. there are way too many factors involved in that number.
If I had to guess, I would say she’s heavier…but I don’t know. On the TV screen she looks slimmer than she does in pictures (like in Mad Men and in the film Drive) so I guess it’s possible!
Anyway it doesn’t really matter, she’s lovely regardless!
I don’t think 150 is right (probably 170-180), but I have noticed that she always looks smaller when standing next to people. I think her giant boobs & soft figure make her seem larger than she actually is.
Umm nooooo. I’m 5’8″ and an hourglass shape (I always have a tiny waist, but my boobs aren’t nearly as big as hers). At my highest weight I was 160lbs and looked nothing like this. My waist was 30″ and I was never over a size 10 (now I’m a size 4). She has to be more like 170-180lbs.
I think 170 sounds about right, those boobs alone would make it impossible for her to weigh 154.
You were 160lbs???? Sorry I’m coming across as surprised because I remember you posting something about struggling to put on weight even when eating over 2000 calories so assumed you must have always been small.
I’m surprised too, but maybe it’s a different Casey?
I think you guys might be confusing Casey with Carriee. Carriee has said many times that she is struggling to gain weight and must eat a high calorie diet in order to do so. I don’t think Casey has ever said that, but I could be wrong.
NO way.
I would say at least 180-90. At the very least.
170 would sound about accurate. Maaaaybe 180. But 190, please? Can’t tell if delusional or trolling. She’s all soft and fluffy, not an ex-wrestler or something.
I thought I was being kind saying that. She is actually big and flabby not soft and fluffy. Katy Perry is soft.
How is she not soft? I see, we must have quite a different understanding of the words “soft” and “flabby”. I don’t think they’re mutually exclusive.
I was saying she doesn’t look very muscular and therefore I would be very surprised if she was actually over 180lbs. Muscle makes a big difference. 190 lbs would put her at an almost obese BMI. That’s ridiculous. She looks slightly overweight and has enormous knockers, the “bordering on obese” people I know look completely different.
(Though obviously BMI is very surprising in some cases. So maybe she’s 154, maybe even 254.)
No way is she a 38dd. I was a 38dd at one point and my boobs were a lot smaller. I’m now a 34e. I’m 145lbs and 5ft 3 and a UK size 12. Waist is 28 and hips 36. It could be possible she is what she says she is. She could just look bigger on tv and pics.
Well I’m 5’9” and 180 and I look a bit smaller than she does. I think that’s like 13 stone? I’m a size 14 UK at this weight so there’s no way she’s 11 stone. Not buying it.
Oh and my measurments are 38-30-40
No, no. I am 5’8″ as well, and was 174 at my highest. At that weight I was getting closer to how she looks.
Forget the weight, no way she has 38 inch hips. No freaking way. As for her being only 154 pounds, I call BS. Look at the picture of her next to that other woman, (who looks to be at a normal weight, not too thin at all) and you can see just how big she is in comparison. In the picture of her wearing those god awful trousers, it looks like her waist is straight-ish, from what I can tell, and I can’t see much curve between her midsection and hips, just goes to see that her curves come from spanx and corsets.
I agree no way she has 38 inch hips. Kim Kardashain is bigger than that and even she isn’t as big as CH.
Christina isn’t a UK size 14 either she is at least a 16 if not more. She also looks smaller when she has her Corsetry and girdles on too. So that “camera adds 10 pounds” thing doesn’t apply to her because the corsets and spanx make her look a lot smaller than she really is.
I reckon 38″ is probably her ‘high-hip’ measurement rather than the ‘low-hip’ where you’re supposed to measure….I’d imagine that would be more like 42 inches or so. Hard to believe she is only 154lb BUT then again she may just have poor body composition, i.e. around 35% body fat which would look very different comapred to a woman the same height/weight with say 25% body fat.
agree
She’s too damn big. Like, her body is just too much.
I’m 5’10, 156, and a US size 6… and my *girls* are a hella lot smaller than hers as well… I wear a B cup… I am telling you for certain there is absolutely no freakin way she is two lbs lighter than me and a size 14. She weighs AT LEAST 180. I wish celebs would own up to their weight and size… she’s a beautiful woman with a stunning figure.. she’s undermining it by lying.
She doesn’t weigh 154 pounds. I’m 5’4.5” and when I was 150 pounds I wasn’t that big.
she is one of the most stunning beauties in hollywood. she should never strive to be too skinny, or loose her curves. her curves are so sexy.
can she finally admit that her boobs are fake? they just look so weird. and there’s no way she’s that light. i have a friend at that height and weight and she was never that heavy looking.
Her breasts are clearly not implants.
AnnieC – curious to know why you think that they are clearly not implants?
I think they are because earlier photos of her show her to have a pear shaped build. Also, being in possession of a substantial bust and lucky enough to have access to Vivienne Westwood corsets, natural breasts do not get that odd curvature at the top. They just don’t.
Am genuinely curious as to why you would think they aren’t implants.
Push up bras do wonders, especially with already big breasts. Christina’s body has changed a lot over the years. I think they’re real, with some extra help from undergarments. A very good friend of mine has a body very similar to Christina’s and her boobs look like that in certain outfits.
Wish she would admit it! She is gorgeous, but c’mon.
I think Christina Hendricks has a pretty face and nice skin, but an average body. I guess it depends on everyone’s personal preferences. Everyone has a different taste. I can see why she’s popular with some men though.
Yeah… my best friend is 5’9″ and weighs around 160. She has a lovely hourglass figure and looks way smaller than Christina. And no way does she have 38″ hips. That is just a blatant lie. I am 5’6″, 115 lbs and have 36″ hips. I get that people carry weight differently and so it’s hard to really say, but this is just too far fetched for me. I really detest when celebrities claim to be so proud of their bodies and that they are role models for “real women”(blech!) and then they and/or their PR people lie about their weights and measurements. That doesn’t help anything.
LOL. she is just nothing special to me, but those stats are just lol.
I am 5’5 150 pounds, but I have a lot of muscle….BUT I am wayyyyy smaller than she is. I don’t really believe it, I’d say 160+
I hate when celebs (or anyone for that matter) preach about how “real” women have curves. So if someone is naturally small or skinny.. Is not a real woman? Please stop preaching about your body.. Every woman is different.
first of all, there is no way that she is 154 lbs if she is 5’8″. secondly, i wouldn’t particularly care except i CANNOT STAND it when people say ‘i love my body, i love my curves, and i accept who i am’ while completely LYING about their weight!! ACK!!!! i find that a way bigger problem and a far worse example than the skinny stars who say ‘yeah i have to work my a** off to be thin’.
I hate how celebrities lie about their weight. People can say it is no big deal, but it distorts one’s body image. When Kim Kardashian says she is a size 2 and I know I am size 2 I feel chubby because to me Kim Kardahsian is chubby. I wish celebrities would tell the truth.
Hi @vs http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-2104555/Kim-Kardashian-parades-generous-curves-beach-Miami-break.html
Please blog about this, Kim’s body is looking CRAZY right now. Did she ever look this exaggerated, lipo?
“i look like a women” is actually “i look like a fat women”.
maybe if her boobs weren’t so large…
Snort. There is no way she is that weight or has those measurements. Her boobs look like G’s and those hips look like 40″ at least. I really dislike how cruel people are about her body but those numbers are lies. Period.
I weight 154, my vital stats are 39(and a G cup)/31/38 and I don’t think I look that heavy.
Also, she has ridonkulous breast implants. I know because my naturally large boobs never go square like that at the top no matter how high I hoick them up.
to everyone saying that her chest must weigh a lot: I am a D cup, so have pretty big boobs and I once weighed them (for a bet ok
) and they were not even half a pound each. even though her boobs look bigger than mine, they won’t actually weigh that much
There was actually a study that look into this, using water displacement. They found that women with 36C breasts weighed approx 2lb per breast or 4lb total. But obviously you have to take into account band size, because a 38DD is a lot bigger than a 32DD in terms of cup volume.
“The Bra Maker’s Handbook” describes how to calculate breast volume and weight based on a series of measurements. A size 34DD breast weighs about 3.0- 3.5 pounds each or 1.4 – 1.6 kg each based on density and volume. Source(s): “The Bra Maker’s Handbook” (Appendix; Calculating Breast Weight & Volume) by Stephanie Williams (Stef the Bra Expert).
Read more: http://wiki.answers.com/Q/How_much_do_34DD_breasts_weigh#ixzz1n9XI5Boz
you should weigh them again
I know many disagree but I’m 5’8” 165 and I’m thinking thats pretty accurate. it may also be 20lbs wrong. Weight is very hard to guess about someone.. she looks about a size 10 to me but what does any of us know. she’s beautiful regardless
First of all, I think she’s gorgeous. I love her on madmen! She shows that beautiful women come in all shapes and sizes. She may not have the type of body you want (I personally think that Nicole S has the perfect body), but you can’t deny she’s smokin’. Second, where in that interview did she say she was 154? I read those quotes twice and don’t see where she says that.
Yeah sorry noo way she is 154. I’m around the same weight and at 5’6 I look much thinner. I have an athletic body type (I do a lot of surfing, yoga, and running) and I wear a size 6 in pants.
Funny enough I was exactly 154 this summer at 5’4 and I even looked much thinner then her (I’m 133 now, just 10 more lbs till my goal!!)
38 inches??? no way. my hips are that size right now, along with a 24.5 inch waist and they don’t look nearly as big as hers?? that just doesn’t seem accurate at all.
Weight depends on the person.
I don’t think she is a 38DD – that’s my size and I don’t think mine look so big! I would have said she was a UK12 or so – she’s really not as big as some people make out. She doesn’t have a big, wide frame – look at her in the last photo, she doesn’t look very large to me there. Weight-wise, I just don’t know – I’ve been told many times that I don’t look as heavy as I am, yet other people look heavier than they are. It’s really hard to tell by looking at someone what their weight is. I also don’t think 154 is accurate though – seems a little low for her, but not 30-40 pounds too low, as some are suggesting! When you look on my body gallery, the women at her height and 150lbs do look slimmer than she does. But as onelovea above said: where in this interview does she say her weight anyway? It’s just a publicity rumour, probably.
But really, why do we expect accuracy when it comes to celeb weight and measurements? 90% of women in Hollywood, who are thin, will say they are between 100 and 120lbs – at the very most – regardless of height. On tv if they have a Jane Doe on a crime show, she will inevitably be like 5’5″ 108 pounds or something – they always make people underweight if they are slim, and low-normal weight if they are obviously a bit bigger. It’s the same with models – I’ve yet to see model measurements that actually look accurate. Height goes the same way – plenty of celebs (mainly men) give themselves an inch or two in height – or if they are really tall, they come down an inch or two to appear more ‘normal’. It’s an industry of conformity – if you’re not within a perceived acceptable range, then you lie about it!
Anyway, I still think Christina is beautiful and sexy, even if she’s not my ‘ideal’ size – and I really don’t care what her weight is!
Yeah like others have said… I’m 5’6 and I weigh around 155 right now (145 when I’m in my best shape) and I look much smaller than her. I have an athletic body (I do yoga, surf, and run a lot) and I carry most of my weight in butt and thighs and I still wear a size 6-8 pants. Her body type is strange to me though… her arms and face look quite thin but her legs and torso look much bigger. Maybe if she lost 10 lbs and toned up she’d be STUNNING. I love curvy and soft body types but hers is a little too much so. Not saying she’s not healthy or anything, I just think she’d look better if her body was in better shape.
I like CH, beautiful face, gorgeous skin, a bit on the thick side but she carries the weight well. I doubt those stats are accurate, my weight and measurements are similar but I’m a little shorter than she is and I look nowhere near as big as she does. She’s thick but she’s not as big as others seem to think she is, there’s a big difference between thick and obese.
I feel like 158 is too light for her stature… but who knows!
DD only?? Really? I also think he hips and waist are wider than stated. I’m not a fan of her figure but she does look a lot slimmer on Mad Men
I think she could perfectly well be that weight. I think she looks amazing and is at healthy weight. And she carries her weight really well.
i don’t know. it could be inacurrate. but different people carry their weight different. and muscle mass weighs more than fat mas. and she isn’t athletic at all. so… she can be around this weigh. but i think she weighs a little bit more.
Christina has got such wide hips!Her hip size looks more like 40 than 38.She is in no way 154lbs.Looks at least 75kg to me.
i agree. her measurements are totally fake! it just can’t be like it’s stated
Too many women go around wearing the wrong sized bra. Her boobs look as though they are F cups at the very least. Neither do I believe she is 154lbs at 5″8 but I don’t think she’s fat and flabby. Those adjectives to describe her sounds as ridiculous as her supposed stats.
I believe her. Her style accentuates her curves and she looks bigger than she is, but in the last photo you can clearly see that she isn’t all that big really. Plus, don’t forget that muscle weighs much more than fat and if she indeed isn’t that toned, she would weigh less than some of you healthy ladies here and still look plump. She doesn’t look overweight and I totally buy that she’s a UK size 14.
Second and third picture = Love.
She’s so pretty. I wouldn’t feel comfortable being so well-endowed but she can pull it off, she has the confidence and easygoingness for it.
Her attitude is refreshing. She is not dragging down other body-types, nor obsessively insisting she’s proud of her curves, nor doing the “real women vs. 12-year old boys” thing, she’s just “be and let be”. Like.
I am 5’7″ and 140 and look infinitely smaller than her. I don’t blame her (or her “people”) for not wanting to say she’s 180..
My measurements are 38DD-30-40, I’m 5’7″ and I’m 167lbs, I’m also a bit more toned than she is. People do carry their weight differently but her bust and bum area looks bigger than mine. I’d say they maybe took away some poundage to keep people from saying she’s fat because of it.
I agree. Her weight wasn’t given in quotations so it’s unlikely she provided it. The DM probably threw in a low ball estimate.
In the last 2 pics where she is wearing top & pants, 154 seems plausible, especially since there is no muscle. She looks much heavier in the silver dress.
I am a lot shorter than her; but both those pics of her in the pants/jeans make size US 10 seem just about right; that’s how bottom heavy I looked at a size 10 although I am 5’2 and was around 138-140 when I was a 10 so if we’re going by the 5 pounds per inch rule she would have to be around 170 (especially because I was not even half as top heavy as her, but I am not sure how much extra weight that would add)…She looks very average sized in the pics of her in the trousers; not too large at all; but the pics of her in that dress make her look about 2 sizes bigger almost like US 14. Also! When I was a size 10 I had 40-41 inch hips.
But the 5lb per inch rule may not work if her frame is small for the height….also I agree she does look much much slimmer in the casual clothing than in some of the fitted dresses she wears…I think she is one of those women who has to be careful how she dresses or she will ultimately look a lot heavier/bigger than she actually is.
Nope, not a chance. I’m 5’8′ and 176 and I definitely consider myself curvy, but I’m smaller than she is. I’d say she’s closer to about 185-190.
I understand we all carry weight differently, but there’s no way she’s in the mid 150′s with those legs and those enormous breasts. I say she’s 20lbs heavier than what she’s admitting to. Curious in why she’s saying that.
Each tit probably weighs a stone each.
I’m 5’8″ and while I recently lost about 10-15lbs, I’d like to believe that my body didn’t look like hers when I was around 153, but in all honesty it probably did. Not that I think her body is bad or anything, it’s just not my personal ideal look for myself. I would believe that she weighs what she says, especially considering how soft she looks. A woman with dense muscle mass will look smaller at the same height and weight than a woman with little muscle mass and more fat.
I’m 5’3″ and I weighed 158 before I lost all my weight, and I looked just like she does now. So no, she’s gotta be more than 158 if she’s that tall.
she looks around 175
154 pounds she is not! She looks great but, as others have pointed out, she is around the 180 range. I’m 5’8 and I looked very much like this (except for the ginormous boobs) after I had my son and was 180. As for her bra and band, I can believe 38 DD depending on the bra company. I used to work in lingerie and pricey European labels tend to have much larger cup sizes than North American.
I believe her. I’m 5’8″ and I was a US 10 when I weighed 155 pounds.
Yea she is absolutely lying! If she were shorter that might be believable. I’d guess she’s 165-180
Hahaha! No way! I am 5’8″ & weigh 62 kgs. I went up to 72kg when pregnant & was smaller than her! She has no muscle-tone what-so-ever!
If I put her boobs on a scale, they’d probably weigh more than I do. Look at them, they’re choking her!
Ouch, there are a lot of negative comments on here. Anyway I think she has a beautiful face/skin, and 154 pounds sounds plausible to me, as I am the same height. She doesnt seem to have much muscle, so if she has a small bone structure as well I dont think shes lying.
I’d only like to point out that she didn’t herself say that 154 pounds, but rather that a gossip celebrity article is reporting it.
Most actresses won’t actually answer questions about their pound number, especially if it is on the higher side.
Seems to me like this is something they just decided to plug in afterwards.
Thank you!
What Casey said!
thanks for pointing this out!
No! She’s about 173! and in my opinion she’s getting really heavy compared to what she looked like at the beginning of Mad Men in ’07 – she’s gone from having ”curves” to looking like a bloated sausage with extra large love handles (especially in that dress lol). I’m 5’7.5 (almost her height exactly) and when I was 151 pounds I was way way way skinnier and only in a 6-7 jean (American sizing) this woman is blowing smoke up our a*s! no one over 5’7 would ever believe she was any less than 170 pounds lol, you can’t fool us tall girls, we’re basically aware of what range someone close to our height weighs quite easily and I’ll say she’s well beyond the 150′s.
LIES! LIES! LIES! All this “body talk” sounds so pretentious. “OMG, I’m a real woman!” So someone with a thin frame is not?! Pssh.
That’s not accurate. I’m 5’7″ and 160 pounds and I look a LOT smaller than her. And if it IS accurate, then I need to buy myself a new mirror.
That ain’t happening! Quite a stretch.
I’m 5’8 and I’m 140 lbs and I am slim…. claiming to be just 10 lbs heavier? Not a chance. She’s 180 or more.
this is so boring – to see a celebrity who is famour for her curves lie about their weight. YAWN. i’m the same height, am a size 6 (and not a vanity size, but ACTUAL), and am less chesty at 32DD, and weigh 148lbs. so i’d guess she’s at least 20 lbs heavier if not more… why the lies?!?!?!
for a pear body, it’s weird that she’s got BIG boobs, did she do a boob job? but she diffidently gained weight
I think it sounds legit. I’m 5’6 1/2 and 135. If I grew two inches and gained 15 pounds, I’d probably look to be around the same weight. Either way, I think that she is gorgeous and should try to keep her weight where it is. She is very beautiful
She has the perfect figure!
Crapsticks! I’m not calling Christina fat or anything. She carries her body well and I think she is very attractive. HOWEVER I would not suit her body. BUT I had to have a medical for work the other day…I didnt look at my weight because of my past ed and issues that I have now in life which have made me gain weight. I decided to take a peak…60kgs! Which is 151lbs! OMG I almost died. I’m used to being between 115 and 130lbs max. I always worked out a lot with weights so had a lot of muscle and used to wear a size 6-8 Aust (2-4 US) and sometimes a 0. I knew I had gained weight because my size 2′s don’t fit and my 4′s are tight. However 20lbs above my maximum! WTF! I can’t be 151lbs can I at 5’2 and size 4-6 can I ?! I dont work out anymore so I dont have muscle…I’m sure some people can look good at that weight and my height but If I am very smalled framed. If I gain too much my head gets lost in my body. What am i going to do!
No way! I have the exact same measurements at 5’2″ and I weigh a heck of a lot more than she does!
no way my sister is that height n a size 16 and she doesnt look half the size …she is stunning but i think she’s lying !!! she has to weigh more or be bigger size.
yes if she does have small bones it would make her look bigger but i honestly dont believe her claims .
Her weight is believable depending on her built. I am 160cm and weight about 55kg but people tend to think I’m a bit heavier than that due to not being pear-shaped.
However, she does need another bra size, she’s definitely not a 38DD, more like a GG or more and a 34 or 32 band size with the modern sizing system.
I am having a really hard time beliveing this. At 5’8″ and 154 pounds is not small, but definatly not Hendricks way of putting it. I am calling her fat. I think she is gorgeous. To put it out there, I respect her very much and hold her as one of my “body role models” along with other beautiful women who display their real body in a positive way. Christina has always been curvy, and to be only 154 pounds at a tall height of 5’8″ is hard to believe, though. First, look at her hoots. Its like two planets on her chest. From which I may say, are not real sadly (one thing I dont like about her). Those must be like 1-2 pounds each or more… by best guesstimane. I am not plastic surgeon. But my the looks of it, her breasticles contribute ALOT to the weight. Second of all, I assume she has large bone structure. Look at the way she carries her weight, very evenly. Thus, it is only “natural” for her to have this weight. If she was 5’8″ and meant to be 120 pounds (which is too light for 5’8″ anyway) she would definatly have that “apple shape” going on and no figure. With that note, at 5’8″-if thats her real height, you cant be lower than a certain weight and lmost cant really be “small boned”. I heard she is a medium frame. Thirdly, they all lie. And who the heck cares. She is beautiful. Do you people believe a celebrity will state her real weight to the public. Let me break it to you: very rarley! They do not even share their REAL measurments. They cut off a few inches from the wait and hip, they instantly lose 10 pounds when a reporter asks their weight. Heres a idea-dont care! She is a gorgeous woman and she obviously loves herself instead of eating like a cat to fit into a certain size or get to a certian number. Gosh, what ever happened to a womans dignity and streangth. I dont care if her real weight is 110 pounds to 210 pounds, as long as I see what I see and how attractive she is and how she carries her weight, it doesn’t really matter. Men don’t (at least not the normal ones) ask your weight before they have a cruch on you. “Oh, she is 10 pounds hevier than what I expected, oh well I wont fantasize about her anymore.” Yeah, doesn’t really happen. Thats what makes her (and many other women) sexy. Cruves, meat and a figure with a lovely personality. What does a mass of a human have to do with superiosity and popularity these days? Jeez, we are becoming more clueless by the second. Or worse, it is considered more “advanced” this way. If thats the case, take me back 50 -100 years when weight didnt matter as much.
I mean “I am NOT calling her fa”t to the first few scentances. LOL.
NixonsaysRexsays has got it 100 per cent correct: the lovely Christina Hendricks is gorgeous as she is, her cascading beauty is immutable whatever her weight. It’s all in the eyes of the beholder; in her case, full in the face of countless millions of men around the globe who can never get too much of her. Her vital stats are part of it, particularly the one that defies gravity. Besides which, in case anybody has forgotten, she is a much better than average actor, so her career may develop and mature too, just as her remarkable image has.
IMPOSSIBLE!!! MY HEIGHT IS THE SAME AND MY WEIGHT IS 68KG ALMOST AS HER 70KG AND THERE IS A HUGE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN US i’M A SIZE 10, CHEST 36 B
, I LOVE HER I’M SUPER FAN , BUT SHE IS LYING…