Pamela Anderson Treats Us with Her Butt… Again
December 22, 2008 in Celebrity Cellulite, Celebrity Oops, Pamela Anderson by Versus
For the second time this week (and for the third time this month), here’s 41-year-old Pamela turning with her (pantless) butt to the camera.
I kinda waisted my comments on the previous pantless occassions, but you can feel free to notice and analyze Pam’s courage (?), back thighs and booty.
In case you don’t believe that the booty belongs to Pamela, turn the page and see!
Great shoes, someone buy her some pants! Add her to your list like Kirsten Dunst’s bra fund!!
Not cute at all!
why the hell is she wearing a pyjama? she looks great, but no need to pull off the bunny until shes 70..
Where’s the rest of her outfit?!? I agree that she looks good but the whole no pants thing is not cute to me.
i dont fidn anything wrong it. i mean its pamela anderson!! i would be suprised if a nun did that. and about her body, shes getting old and is aging. wrinkles or whatever, i like it. very brave and is giving out the message “i dont give a f***” which is very bold ;]
41 isn’t “old” !
Uhhh…no pants again? Her body looks okay, and maybe if she wore a more fitted shirt than lose, then it would actually look like she had shorts on instead of nothing at all. That’s just me.
I don’t like the outfit (really, REALLY don’t like it), but she does look good for her age so I give her credit for keeping herself up.
It is completely inappropriate. Period. She has two boys. It is time to grow up and put away the “I am still a blond bombshell.” You don’t have to wear visibly not there white underwear out to show that you still look good for your ‘age’ or whatever. There is nothing bold about it. It is trashy.
mmm she looks like shes desperate for paparazzi attention. and she’s finding it harder as she’s getting older
I agree with you. she looks so desperate.