Brooke Hogan Takes Her Strong Legs for a Ride
January 19, 2009 in Brooke Hogan by Versus

Brooke has one of those body types that stirs debates and sometimes attracts criticism. And for what? Simply because she is not part of the mega-skinny Hollywood trend – in fact, she will never be part of the skinny trend, even if she wanted to, even if she put all her efforts into it.
Why? Simply because she is a girl with a big bone structure and a naturally athletic body type, or more precisely, because she’s daddy’s girl. In more scientific terms, Brooke has a mesomorph body type, the kind that is characterized by large bones, a hard and muscular physique and a well defined, strong body. And while we might be able to change our size, we aren’t able to change our bone structure or our body type.
2 more pictures of Brooke’s strong legs after the jump!











I guess the goal is to try and do the best you can with what genetics gave you to work with. That being said, I still think she can stand to lose a few.
Are you INSANE? Please, explain to me where should she take pounds from.
I don’t care if she loses a few, she will still not be attractive.
Obviously, you’re a jealous female pretending to be a man! There isn’t a man alive (not a real man, anyway) that doesn’t find her attractive! And, if youdon’t think the same…you’re a douche! get out of our genepool.
She is gorgeous and beats the hell out of all those fake hollywood celebs. She is fit, healthy and takes care of herself. That is beauti.
I totally agree with you anya. Brooke is beautiful and from what I`ve seen of her on “Hogan Knows Best” and “Brooke Knows Best”, I think she has a great personality! Brooke is a great example that you don`t have to be skinny to be beautiful.
I have the same problem as her. I’m super muscular and although I work out everyday and eat healthy (mostly because I’m vegan), my body will never be slim.
I only wish i had your problem! lol
If you’re a girl that’s most likely mostly fat. Girls carry much less muscle than guys do, but more fat. So it only makes sense that you would be fat, not muscular. Take a biology class.
What the hell? Are you retarded? Go back to your Biology class if you think girls can’t be muscular.
I really know nothing about her except the pictures I´ve seen here and at other websites, and while I propably wouldn´t enjoy having her body type, I think she´s doing her best what she can with it. Her legs are super-toned and there´s no sight of cellulite. Good for her.
“lose a few”? She’s not fat, what would she lose? She would lose muscle, but that’s her body type, so why should she “lose a few”? I think she looks great. She’s an Amazon
Exactly, it’s as if everyone expects girl to be skinny with no muscle. As soon as they see a thick girl with lots of muscle they feel threatened.
I agree most guys feel alittle threatened by a girl with more muscle then they do. For me I’ve come to except the fact that my GF’s legs are stronger than mine. She can squat 185lbs for 5 reps while I can only do 135lbs for maybe 3 reps. Her legs are like Brooke’s (toned and very musclar but still feminine). She was a dancer and likes to bike hills and go to the gym. I don’t have the time to work out all body parts and tend to stick to my upper body (my legs are much thinner and lack visable muscle like hers but she does’nt care). I guess I feel ok about it because my upper body is still very muscular and much stronger then hers. (She bench presses about 85lbs which is better then most girls while I can still do 225lb). She does’nt rub it in either so that helps too. I have too admit I would not be attracted to her if her upper body was big and muscular like a guy. She is slim up top but toned (perfect).
Brook’s legs look great just like I think my GF’s legs look great.
Yeh, some guys like my BF have weak legs. He is all big arms, chest and shoulders. My arms are like twigs compared to his. Sure he is 3 or 4 times stronger in upper body strength but I can leg press more. He gets embarrassed about that when I tell others. His legs are less muscular and thinner than mine.
Well you’re probably a liar. Either that or your boyfriend only works out his upper body and NEVER his lower, and you work out your lower all the time and never your upper. That could be the only plausible reason for you being able to leg press more(if that is even true). His legs probably aren’t thinner(or not that much) and probably not (much)weaker but just shaped differently.
Honestly, your legs probably aren’t more muscular than his. If yours are larger it’s probably mostly fat(same with Dougs GF) since girls have more fat and less muscle than guys naturally, which also means they have less strength(in upper & lower body). You, yourself probably can’t even leg press that much.
What are your respective heights and weights?
“I agree most guys feel alittle threatened by a girl with more muscle then they do”
Generally guys have more muscle than girls(in the upper and lower body) so MOST girls won’t be more muscular than moist guys. Girls have mostly fat. Just because they don’t like it doesn’t mean they’re threatened, they might just be grossed out because girls aren’t supposed to be muscular, biologically speaking, and most girls aren’t.
And your girl only squats 185? That’s not very much. I know weak guys who can squat like 200+ for like 5 reps. Either way I think you’re bullsh*tting about your GF. Also, Brookes legs(and most of her body) aren’t feminine. Also, your legs might not necessarily be thinner(or even weaker), but just shaped differently.
Please, take a biology class. Girls naturally carry more fat and MUCH less muscle. Girls are not supposed to be muscular, so you can understand why a lot of guys think it’s gross. It isn’t common to see a very muscular girl, but when people do it is gross because the girl looks more manly.
They aren’t threatened, they’re just grossed out because girls naturally are not supposed to be muscular(most aren’t anyway). People want girls just to be average, skinny but not too skinny. NOT muscular.
Does anyone know how much she weighs and how tall she is??
All I know is that she’s 5’11” (179 cm)… so she can’t be less than 155.
Thank you Versus! You rox
wow! look at her legs! So strong and toned! I love her body!
i wouldnt say i love her body or would like her body, but i gotta give credit where its due
the girl is obviously very strong, fit, toned.
definately an Amazon woman
and she definately gets alot more criticism for her body (which is so obviously genetically just the way she is formed) than she deserves.
I agree that she is an Amazon woman, but she is better… she has two boobs
LOL
i think she’s perfect
I think her legs look great! I used to run track and I aimed to get my legs like that.
Wow, this girl is buff. I wonder how much she squats. Look at those quads…incredible!
hot legs!
Okay, let me jump in from a man’s perspective…I’d date Brooke Hogan in a New York minute! I don’t think she’s the prettiest woman I’ve seen, but I love her smile. She seems to have a nice personality and appears to be a fun person to be around. And let there be no doubt….her physique is simply magnificent! I just love her legs….
Forget the pencil-thin anorexic Hollywood types….this is a REAL woman!
She would be able to pull you out of a car wreck if you were stuck.
She has a beautiful body! Her legs are super hot .. strong and sleek. Why is it that women are supposed to look like teenage boys with no curves? What has happened to our society when we are saying that a girl that looks like Brooke is fat??!!! I’ll tell you another thing, when she is older her body will still be ‘up’ there and tight whereas the ‘twiglits’ with no muscle to speak of will have all their bits hanging down to their knees.
I’m 13 and i have thick boned legs i always used to look at others legs and be like “Wow i wish i was like that..” but now that i read these it makes me feel alot better about my self.. I run track and i weigh more than other girls most of the time but they say thick bones and my legs are very toned&muscular.
After reading this post I must assume there are a lot of really troubled girls here. I mean, you have the right to like or dislike anything – if your aesthetical ideal are androgynous faced girls with waif-looking bodies, than fine. But you should still be able to recognize what is healthy and what is not. If you think this girl should lose any amount of weight, you have a problem and you should take care of it.
On the other hand, this served to wake me up, bacause sometimes when I spend too much time reading the comments here I start to feel bad about myself because so many people praise such impossible (and mostly artificial) bodies, and now I see a nice, healthy, young and fit woman looking so good with a nice, feminine pair of legs and I still have to read comments like “she should shed a few pounds”.
If we lived in a normal world her body shouldn’t even raise any kind of controversy. I doubt any heterossexual man would call her fat. WAKE UP, GIRLS.
hello!,I really like your writing very much! percentage we be in contact more about your article on AOL? I need an expert on this space to solve my problem. Maybe that’s you! Having a look ahead to peer you.