Britney’s Stomach Exposed on the Cover of Rolling Stones
November 25, 2008 in Britney Spears by Versus
Doesn’t this look a lot like Britney back in 2002?
Nicely defined abs, healthy look, relaxed attitude, natural makeup – and even the hair looks natural, unlike in Britney’s Circus promos.
What do you think of the cover?
BONUS: One extra promo after the jump!
ugly face btw
I so prefer the Rolling Stone cover to her album promos. Tis awesome.
I love how natural she looks with great abs and it’s her actual body shape unlike the fake Hourglass body they’ve given her in the album promos.
Am so glad to have her back and am soooo indescribably excited about this Saturday when she’s going to perform on The X Factor! Omg I wish I could be there (^_^)
Btw Versus, am I right in thinking her body shape is a ruler?
I agree, Linda, Britney is an athletic ruler.
her face for her album cpover loks lots diffrent and younger than her face in roling stones. it just goes to show you how much photoshop they used …
ruler body types have skinny arms and legs even when they gain weight(which goes to the tummy area)
^^ no that’s apple shape.
despite how good she looks post=weight loss, she looks still not ‘all with it’ theres something weird about her look.
i’ve always hated her thick neck – makes her look chunky
she is not a ruler, she is actually an athletic hourglass, her waist is smaller than her bust and butt!